Press emoji if you still trying to earn some cash here ✌️
👍9🔥7

Channel
@ShibaMage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
590subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002424982517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShibaMage |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 7 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShibaMage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 590 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 592 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 598 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 602 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 602 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
245 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 32.7% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 26.1% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 15.5% | |
| 👀 | 24 | 9.80% | |
| 🙈 | 11 | 4.49% | |
| 😇 | 8 | 3.27% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.45% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.04% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.04% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2025 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Press emoji if you still trying to earn some cash here ✌️
👍9🔥7
What a nice comeback after 8 month, somebody did a massive crime i guess 😂 SPX69 also did ath today, what do you think, it is real comeback to memecoins? How many of you are trading these days?
❤4
Comeback is real? 👀
👀3😇3
I think we will see green charts finally in march and some motion in meme coins. Be prepared
❤4👀1
I hope you haven't traded in the last few weeks while the huge shits going on here
What do you think guys? It's game over for memes and solana? 😂😂 🙈-gg 👀-It's just a dip 😂
👀13🙈7❤3💯2🤩1
This is my wallet tracking earnings what i did last week. Now I can drop some calls here without any stress. Like I always say, adapting to the market is key, you can still make money if you move smart. I’ll share the tools I use for wallet tracking later. Glad to see you all still grinding and making the most of it! ❤️✌️
👍16💯4🔥4❤3
I’ve been working on new strategies, tracking wallets, and found some solid plays—made a lot just by following smart money. Haven’t called any of those here yet, but this just proves we gotta adapt and find new ways to profit in this market. These days, no one holds for more than a few hours. To keep this challenge alive, I’ll try to catch some good low caps that my tracked wallets are buying. But trust me, you can’…
🔥16❤9😇4🤩3👏2
Crazy shit happening around here
🔥2
I'm not a financial advisor. The goal here is to show you how consistent strategies can build wealth over the long run, not to chase quick flips. If you're risking it all on a single project with your life savings... that's your decision, not my responsibility. Be smart, stay disciplined, and always manage your risk. You only win by playing smart and making long-term decisions. You have to do your own research, kno…
❤11👏3👍2🙈1
ahh unlucky, second coin won pvp. That's ok, impossible to win all trades 😂 still holding my bag ✌️
👌5🙈1
One of huge caller buying this coin. Keep an eye on this coin, some x's incoming 👀
👀7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ShibaMage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ShibaMage” (@ShibaMage), 590 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShibaMage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.