Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ШЕСТАКОВ+

@Shestakov360

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

593subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002238990003
TypeChannel
Username@Shestakov360
DescriptionНеофициальные мысли и эксклюзивные кадры из зоны СВО, а также актуальные новости России и международной арены. Частный канал военного журналиста и телеведущего Антона Шестакова.
Created23 June 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Shestakov360

Growth

5937 Aug 2026, 13:04 — 593 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:17 — 593 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:048 Aug 2026, 03:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 592–594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:17593no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:04593first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 593 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,412
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,070
Videos
6,450
Links
1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 06s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1238.7%
👍825.8%
💯722.6%
🤨26.45%
😁13.23%
🤝13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC52 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vesti_dezhurnaya_chastVideo

Лавочка прикрыта! Оперативники ФСБ совместно с полицейскими перекрыли один самых крупных каналов, через который мошенники выводили за границу -- на счета украинских кураторов -- похищенные у россиян деньги. В бизнес-центре «Москва-Сити» задержали два десятка сотрудников нелегальных криптообменников, через которые из страны утекали украденные средства. Генпрокуратура России уже взяла на контроль расследование дел. О т

👍2🤝1

7 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Причина, по которой во всратой недостране нет и не будет диктатуры, заключается в любви украинского народа к революциям», — Кулеба. Сказочный долбоёб…. 🤦🏻‍♂️ @Shestakov360

💯2

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC88 viewsread 8 August 2026

Сенат США одобрил законопроект о «жестоких санкциях» против РФ и Ирана. @Shestakov360

7 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC397 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Да-да, всё верно. Вы не ошиблись, коллеги) Гордон - он и в Беларуси гондон! @Shestakov360

👍2😁1

7 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сообщается, что всратая недострана ведёт переговоры с Илоном Маском о предоставлении доступа к сервисам Starlink над территорией РФ для поражения дронами пусковых установок российских баллистических ракет. @Shestakov360

🤬4

7 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC106 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Там, где бьются с москалями, там Польша помогает, даже если не участвует напрямую в этой войне», — президент Польши Навроцкий. А у нас до сих пор не хватает яиц уебать хорошенько по этим помощниками, чтобы неповадно было помогать… @Shestakov360

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Брянск под атакой дронов! Сообщают о мощных прилетах по инфраструктуре! @Shestakov360

🤬4

7 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC119 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ебучим хохлам, которые, кстати, сидят за границей и свою ссыкливую шкуру спасли, не нравится, что их нормальные и здоровые на голову бывшие земляки после жестокой бусификации выбирают сторону России и идут убивать своих обидчиков. А также тех, кто допустил уничтожение их страны и населения. Хохломрази во власти сами создали такие условия, при которых у людей есть три выбора: могила, за кордон или в армию России осво

💯4

7 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Российские хакеры получили доказательства прямой вовлеченности НАТО в совершение Украиной терактов на территории России. Специалисты в области гибридных угроз, связанные с НАТО, обеспечивали Киев данными о целях на территории РФ, преимущественно объектах ТЭК, и судах т.н "теневого флота", которые затем подверглись атакам дронов и безэкипажных катеров. Но, разумеется, у нас это вновь проглотят и никак не отреагируют

🤨2

6 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ЖУРНАЛИСТ: «Похоже, Россия усилила свои атаки на гражданские объекты. Это должно вызывать у вас беспокойство?» ТРАМП: «Послушайте, мы не вовлечены в это. Нас разделяет океан» ЖУРНАЛИСТ: «Военный диктатор Зеленский хочет ракеты Patriot!» ТРАМП: «Что ж, мы тоже хотим ракеты Patriot. Байден передал Украине боеприпасов на $300 млрд. Когда я уходил, наши склады были полными, а теперь мы их восстанавливаем» Теперь глав

💯1

6 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC131 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Дорога в Крым. Хохлы начали вновь устраивать террор и бить по мирному населению. А, что там в Киеве, Одессе или Львове…?!? Правильно! НИЧЕГО!!! «Мыженетакие» В лучшем случае удары по складам и военным объектам. Но, как видно, это абсолютно не мешает хохломразям бить по нашим дорогам и пляжам. @Shestakov360

🤬4

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Shestakov360. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 465,510 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ШЕСТАКОВ+” (@Shestakov360), 593 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shestakov360.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.