Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sherlock's Hub

@SherlocksHub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,606subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624628535
TypeChannel
Username@SherlocksHub
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SherlocksHub

Growth

1,5951,6061,600.56 August 2026 — 1,595 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,595 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,606 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,593–1,608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:121,606+11
7 Aug 2026, 07:041,595no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:341,595first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 1,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
552
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,207
Reactions total19
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4431.2%
3726.2%
👏2417.0%
🔥96.38%
👀74.96%
😁42.84%
🏆32.13%
🤣32.13%
😎21.42%
🤯21.42%
🌭10.709%
🐳10.709%
👌10.709%
👎10.709%
😱10.709%
🤔10.709%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SherlocksHub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC198 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

בשלב הזה זה נהייה סטנדרט תעשייתי: אם המודל שלך לא יצא מה sandbox ופרץ לאיזה חברת AI מסכנה אחרת, הוא כנראה לא שווה כלום 😮 אני מקווה שעכשיו ברור לכולנו שלא מדובר ביותר מטריק שיווקי שהמטרה שלו לעורר שיח ולהראות את היכולות של הכלי (גם אם המוסריות מוטלת בספק). אני ברשותכם אצטט קצת מציוץ מעניין של @cyb3rops שראיתי השבוע: האייג'נט לא ברח משום מקום. הוא קיבל גישה חופשית לאינטרנט, המנגנוני הגנה לפעולות סייבר הושבתו, נתנו לו

👍2😎21

22 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC663 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

נראה שקהילת הסייבר בטלגרם ישראל מתחילה משחקי OSINT CTF. בתור התחלה הערוץ Cyber Security + Coding שלח אתגר OSINT מעניין עם כמה רמות קושי שונות, כשהכל מתחיל בכתובת קריפטו אחת, בסגנון follow the money💰. ובנוסף, ערוץ LΣҒΔ𝕽ΩLL 🇮🇱 הכריז על ה Israel OSiNT league, תחרות נושאת פרסים שבה בכל מוצש יישלח אתגר חדש. 🤑 אז חשבתי להכין אתכם קצת למאורע עם מאגרים של כלי OSINT שחובה להכיר, גם בשביל החידות, וגם בשביל היומיום. ❌❌❌❌ ב

11🏆1

19 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC723 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

למי אתם מאמינים?

  1. לטלגרם. אם הם אומרים שאין חולשה אז אין חולשה.10%
  2. לZDI. הם יודעים מה הם עושים.39%
  3. הNSA כנראה יודע יותר טוב משניהם על אילו חולשות יש או אין בטלגרם73%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC623 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

חולשת 0-day המאפשרת הרצת קוד מרחוק בטלגרם ע"י שליחת סטיקרים, זוכרים את זה? 🪅 הרשת געשה (קישורים ארז דסה וגם לאפרול) סביב ה"חולשה הזאת" בסוף חודש מרץ. בשישי הקרוב סוף סוף נדע מה הסיפור. ⏳ מוכנים? ➖➖➖ תקציר של השתלשלות האירועים: * חוקר מ ZDI טוען שמצא חולשת 0-day בטלגרם, שע"י שליחת סטיקר לנמען הוא יכול לגרום להרצה של קוד מרחוק על המכשיר שלהם (אנדרואיד) - ZDI-CAN-30207. * טלגרם הכחישו, אמרו שזה בלתי אפשרי כי כל הסטיקרים

🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC861 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

הדרמה על ה GDID (global devide ID) ממשיכה לצבור תאוצה. 📣 בחור בטוויטר (masagravel) שחוקר ווינדוס, מנסה להסביר בשרשור קצת יותר על המזהה הזה, ואיך לדעתו הFBI השיג גישה לכל היסטוריית הגלישה של המשתמש. הוא טוען שהמשתמש בטח השתמש בדפדפן Edge עם טלמטריה אופציונלית דולקת, ומשם המידע. עם זאת, כמו שכתבתי בפוסט המקורי, במסמך של הFBI לא מוזכר שום דפדפן 🤷‍♂️. פה זה לא נגמר, כי גם פרוטון (האלה עם המייל והVPN) הצטרפה להמולה. הם

👍2

9 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC604 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vxundergroundPhoto

> read court affidavit on ransomware operator > ransoms multi-billion dollar company > does it while running Windows 11 > logs into Facebook from that computer > uses Microsoft Edge

😁4

4 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC644 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

יש לי הרבה פוסטים בתור שתכננתי לשלוח, אבל זה לא סובל דיחוי: מייקרוסופט הודתה בבית משפט 👨‍⚖️- מערכת הריגול (או טלמטריה לשיפור חווית משתמש 🤡) שלהם הרבה יותר מתקדמת ומתוחכמת ממה שחשבנו עד עכשיו. הרבה. 🚨 וזה פעם ראשונה שהסדר גודל של הדבר הזה נחשף. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ תקציר: ⭕️ פיטר סטוקס הוא נער בן 19 שחשוד כפעיל בקבוצת Scattered Spider, ועומד כרגע למשפט בארצות הברית אחרי שהוסגר לשם מפינלנד (#1). ⭕️ במשפט, בעדות של סוכן FBI שחקר

👍4🤯2

4 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC848 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

אבל בכל זאת, הנה כמה צעדים לעשות: 🐋 להריץ את הסקריפט Win11Debloat (מתאים גם לווינדוס 11): סקריפט פוורשל שבצורה אינטואיטיבית ונוחה מכבה פיצ'רים מיותרים ומסיר אפליקציות בלואוט מווינדוס. זה הדבר הראשון שאני מריץ על כל מחשב ווינדוס שאני מוכרח להשתמש בו. גם מטפל בענייני ריגול ופרטיות, וגם עושה את המחשב ליותר נוח לשימוש, בלי AI בכל מקום, אקסבוקס או משחקים, וסתם פיצ'רים שמעמיסים על העיניים. 🦈 יש כאן GoDark סקריפט מעניין שחו

👍10

3 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC431 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @geektimecoilPhoto

בעקבות הפרסום בגיקטיים: הפיצ'ר החדש של וואטסאפ ייבחן על ידי מערך הסייבר https://www.geektime.co.il/israels-national-cyber-directorate-will-check-whatsapp-new-feature/

👀1👍1

3 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC485 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

שימו לב לשורה של על אחת כמה וכמה כשבניגוד לטלגרם למשל, וואטסאפ היא כלי שמשמש הרבה מוקדי תמיכה, מכירה ושירות. הרבה שואלים למה זה לא מדאיג אף אחד כשיש את זה בטלגרם או סיגנל, וזאת הסיבה. הרבה חברות, כמו חברות ביטוח, אשראי, בנק, כמו גם חנויות או עסקים קטנים, מנהלים תקשורח עם הלקוחות דרך ווצאפ. תקשורת שהיא הרבה פעמים גם רגישה ולא רק בדיקת מלאי במחסני חשמל. ולכן כשזה מגיע לווצאפ זה יותר רגיש. אני אישית חושב שבמקום לחסום א

👍4

29 Jun 2026, 21:11 UTC704 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

אחרי טלגרם וגם סיגנל, סוף סוף ווצאפ מאפשרים לתקשר בעזרת username בלבד. 🕵️‍♂️ מה הפיצ'ר נותן? * אנשים יכולים לכתוב לי בווצאפ (וכהמשך לזה גם לבצע שיחות וידאו/קול) רק לפי היוזרניים שלי, בלי שאחשוף את מספר הטלפון. 😎 * אפשר להגדיר קוד, כך שלא כל אחד יוכל לכתוב לי אם הוא ניחש את היוזרניים, אלא הוא חייב גם מפתח כלשהו שאני אתן לו אישית - בלי המפתח (רק אם הוגדר) ההודעה לא תגיע אליי בכלל. 🔐 לפני שאתם זורקים עליי את ה copy pa

👍10👎1

24 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC923 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

> היו אני > מחוסר עבודה - משועמם 🥱 > מקבל פישינג על חבילה במכס (כמובן שזה קישור מקוצר, אני לא לוחץ על דברים כאלה - wheregoes) > נכנס, מכניס פרטים מזויפים (ג'נרוט תז, כרטיסי אשראי), > מסניף תעבורה דרך הדפדפן (קליק ימני, Inspect, ואז Network) 😘 [זה עדיף מ wireshark כי אפשר לראות את התעבורה ללא הצפנה] > מגלה שברו שולח את כל הפרטים לבוט בטלגרם > משום מה ב-RESPONSE יש את הפרטים האלה 🤷‍♂️: יוזרניים של הבוט: @Top_topp_tvop

👏15🤣3🏆2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SherlocksHub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTCFinal Results59 voters

למי אתם מאמינים?

  1. לטלגרם. אם הם אומרים שאין חולשה אז אין חולשה.10%
  2. לZDI. הם יודעים מה הם עושים.39%
  3. הNSA כנראה יודע יותר טוב משניהם על אילו חולשות יש או אין בטלגרם73%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 774,466 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sherlock's Hub” (@SherlocksHub), 1,606 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SherlocksHub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.