蓝军加什么群关你屁事,盯着蓝军log记在哪上班和谁打过你家的变态绿女

Channel
绿水雨大人的赛博名人堂
@ShenjingRain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003923833529 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShenjingRain |
| Description | 上海著名不蓝不绿玩家 SpiritRain,对蓝军充满怨毒和愤恨,十年来从不帮助蓝军阵营;对绿军玩家充满傲慢和漠视,以自定义“原蓝军高层”身份在绿军社群耀武扬威,经常被踢飞 本频道现由萝天王全权管理,请高喊民警救人不幸去世纯属自找的心理变态勿骚扰无关玩家。建议公开向被自己贬低侮辱的蓝军朋友道歉,并麻溜的滚出Ingress游戏社群 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 17 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShenjingRain |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 7 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 199.2%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13.9
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (17 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 251 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 182
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
还不是因为蓝军到现在都还有尊称她妖总夸她优秀的傻逼,喜欢喊d老板k总f神的绿军反而没有叫她妖总的。 所以她在绿军群里不敢发飙,也不敢骂绿军;没人惯着她,随时让她滚蛋。哪怕她疯狂阴阳蓝军也没豁免权。
有些人真是不要脸
还有微缩景观 😳
https://telegra.ph/逆天ENL慈禧一天内发上百条消息怒斥上海绿军各管理员排挤蓝军玩家和大搞身份政治-06-01 #SpiritRain
https://telegra.ph/震惊上海绿军竟把高贡献玩家从群里踢出ENL慈禧怒斥上海绿军排挤霸凌-05-31 #SpiritRain
最抽象的是,绿军群一直就没关过历史聊天记录查看权限,就留着给她看的;所以绿水雨反复进出绿军群,其实始终都能看到别的绿军,尤其是她那些日常合作伙伴和她三天两头去帮忙升床坡的好朋友对她的锐评…… 但没看她对任何绿军公开谴责过一句话。哦除了替群友惩恶扬善把她踢走的Gin507,她喷过,然后起床就又删了,放了12小时都不到,那不能算吧。 一句都没有,尽管她曾经以绿军身份冲到北蓝读者群重拳出击,谴责某蓝军在游戏里“霸凌”她。还拉了个蓝军间谍东云龙给她捧哏一搭一唱,打拳打到兴奋的时候还咒蓝军死。 一句都没有,尽管她心里非常清楚自己的某几个合作伙伴是怎么开飞机的和用了哪些小号的,想抨击完全有依据可以喷。 那……怎么上海绿军反复,并且是集体霸凌她,她就忍了。Man what can I say? 是上海绿军有盖世太保还是ICE,只要她批判一句就会把她抓起来遣返?抑或是被绿军遣返回蓝军这个可能性让她焦虑的不行?只要绿军不逼她回蓝军,被绿…
2019 年 8 月 13 日晚,我发文指出绿军玩家 wojiaoxiaoming 主动炫耀用别人号玩游戏,并且对广大蓝军玩家进行侮辱和性骚扰 2019 年 8 月 14 日早上七点十分,绿水雨立刻时隔多年首次冲到我地盘一顿狂轰滥炸,帮她亲爱的对蓝军喷粪专家小冥出气~ 她的付出得到了回报: 2026 年 6 月 1 日,绿水雨亲爱的对蓝军喷粪专家小冥辱骂绿水雨是“没工作”、 “npd” 即自恋型人格障碍(Narcissistic Personality Disorder)并支持踢走她 https://t.me/enlshanghai/259 而且赞同群友说的“看神经雨在群里说话就像吃屎”观点 https://t.me/enlshanghai/1357
夹这个字,运用的恰到好处
不好意思 ( 那还是从屁眼里拿出来放嘴里含着吧
人家蓝军屁眼夹着金汤匙出生的,不一样
我信仰enlightened,没有金汤匙这个条件不转的
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ShenjingRain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 495,231 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“绿水雨大人的赛博名人堂” (@ShenjingRain), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShenjingRain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.