Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,428–138,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:05
137,513
-62
11 Aug 2026, 18:41
137,575
-43
10 Aug 2026, 19:42
137,618
-69
9 Aug 2026, 20:52
137,687
-84
8 Aug 2026, 20:03
137,771
-130
7 Aug 2026, 17:23
137,901
-100
6 Aug 2026, 19:10
138,001
-81
6 Aug 2026, 04:19
138,082
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.0%
avg views ÷ 137,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
50,800
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
23 (11 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
1,118,300
Reactions total
3,574
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 25s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,042 reactions across 23 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,260
80.7%
👍
515
12.7%
😢
103
2.55%
🕊
71
1.76%
🥰
33
0.816%
🎉
22
0.544%
🤩
19
0.47%
😍
9
0.223%
🏆
5
0.124%
👌
5
0.124%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,042reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Shayx_MuhammadSodiq_Muxlislari. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЭШИКНИ ЁПИНГ ОНА.
Насроний аёл, "Эй Муҳаммад, қанисан? Умматинг туғилган кунингни нишонлаб қизимни ўлдирди!", дея бақирар эди. Жавоби эса ҳайқириқдан кўра тезроқ келди.
Ҳикоянинг бошланиши...
1953 йил, Лубноннинг Сайда шаҳрида мусулмонлар одатдагидек Пайғамбаримизнинг туғилган кунларини нишонлар эди.
Лубнонда қадимдан байрамларда осмонга ўқ отиш одати урф бўлиб, бу сафар ҳам шундай тарзда отилган ўқлардан бири ма…
ГУНОҲЛАРНИНГ МАҒФИРАТ ҚИЛИНИШИГА САБАБ БЎЛУВЧИ ДУО ВА АМАЛЛАР
1. Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам: “Ким бирор янги кийим кийиб, “Алҳамду лиллаҳиллазий касаний ҳаза ва розақонийҳи мин ғойри ҳавлин минний ва ла қувваҳ”, деса, Аллоҳ унинг олдинги гуноҳларини кечиради”, дедилар. Абу Довуд ривояти.
2. Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам дедилар: Кимки таом еб, “Алҳамду лиллаҳиллазий атъоманий тоъама ҳаза ва розақ…
АЁЛ КИШИНИ АВТОМОБИЛ БОШҚАРИШИГА ДИНИМИЗДА РУХСАТ БОРМИ?
@Shayx_Muxlislariuz САВОЛ:
Ассаламу алайкум устоз. Аёл кишини автомобил бошқаришига динимизда рухсат борми? Иложи бўлса далил билан жавоб берсангиз илтимос. Олдиндан раҳмат айтиб муҳлисингиз Умиджон Ош шаҳри Қиргизистон
ЖАВОБ:
– Ва алайкум ассалом! Бу янги масала бўлгани учун турлича қараш бор. Далил ўрнига сизга ўз қулоғим билан эшитган бир воқеани айтиб…
ҲАЖ ВА УМРАНИНГ САВОБИНИ БЕРАДИГАН АМАЛ
@Shayx_Muxlislariuz САВОЛ:
Ассалому алайкум! Бир марузада ким агар бомдод намозидан кейин то тонг чиққунча зикр саловат Қуръон тиловат қилса умра ва ҳажнинг савоби берилади деб эшитдим. Шу хақида хадис хам бор экан.
ЖАВОБ:
– Ва алайкум ассалом! Шуруқ (ишроқ) намози
عَنْ مُعَاذِ بْنِ أَنَسٍ الْجُهَنِيِّ رَضِي اللهُ عَنْهُ، عَنْ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ق…
Набий соллаллоҳу алайҳи васалламга салавот айтишни кўпайтиришнинг кўплаб самаралари бор:
– хатоларнинг беркитилиши;
– амалларга ривож берилиши;
– даражаларнинг юксалтирилиши;
– гуноҳларнинг кечирилиши;
– салавот йўлловчининг ҳақига истиғфор айтилиши;
– «қийрот» (Аллоҳга маълум бўлган миқдор) мислидек ажр ёзилиши;
– ажри тугал бўлиши;
– барча салавотини у зотга тўлиқ қилган киши учун дунё ва охират ишига кифоя қили…
ДЎЗАХДАН ОЗОД БЎЛИШ ДУОСИ
1201. Анас ибн Моликдан ривоят қилинади:
Расулуллоҳ соллаллоҳу алайҳи васаллам шундай дедилар:
«Ким тонгда уйғониб, «Аллоҳим Албатта, биз тонг оттирдик. Ўзингни гувоҳ қилиб ва Аршингни кўтариб турганларни, фаришталарингни, ҳамма махлуқотларингни шоҳид қилиб дуо қиламиз. Сен Ўзингдан бошқа илоҳи маъбуд йўқ Зотсан. Фақат Ўзинг борсан, шеригинг йўқ. Муҳаммад Сенинг банданг ва Расулингдир», дес…
🤲🌹ЖУМА АЙЁМИНГИЗ МУБОРАК БЎЛСИН!!!🎉
🌺ЖУМА кунингиз муборак бўлсин! Ҳар бир эзгу ишларингизда Аллоҳ Ёр ва Ёрдамчингиз бўлсин!
🌺Эзгу амаллар қилиш учун имкон бериб, ЖУМА кунига етказган Аллоҳга беҳисоб шукурлар бўлсин!
🌺ЖУМА кунида Аллоҳдан Ўзингиз ва Ота-Онангиз ва барча яқинларингизни мағфират қилишини сўрайман!
🌺ЖУМА кунида Аллоҳ дуоларимизни ижобат, фарзандларимизга салоҳият, ибодатларимизга гўзаллик, ризқимизг…
❤127👍28🎉3🥰3🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Shayx_MuhammadSodiq_Muxlislari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,631 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TIBBIYOT TV @TIBBIYOT_TV · 199,920 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
5 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ШАЙХ МУХЛИСЛАРИ !!!” (@Shayx_MuhammadSodiq_Muxlislari), 137,513 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Shayx_MuhammadSodiq_Muxlislari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
