Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Shays[ON]

@ShaysOFF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

863subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002645245095
TypeChannel
Username@ShaysOFF
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ShaysOFF

Growth

8636 Aug 2026, 23:02 — 863 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:01 — 863 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:027 Aug 2026, 17:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 862–864 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 17:01863no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:02863first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held14 (20 March 202616 July 2026)
Views total
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

225 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9542.2%
👍4118.2%
😁3214.2%
🔥2410.7%
🎉188.00%
73.11%
31.33%
🤯31.33%
🕊10.444%
🫡10.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ShaysOFF. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 20:06 UTC≈10,300 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁175

11 May 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,330 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fisedoto

Как устроены читы в Dota 2 😛 Получилось достаточно объемно. Несколько раз переписывал, потом еще больше раз редактировал, проверял некоторые моменты и тд, но надеюсь будет интересно. Я постарался ответить на все возможные вопросы внутри, но если что-то осталось, то велком в комменты, постараюсь ответить на что смогу. 🦞 Аналитика на коленке

10👍3🔥3

9 Apr 2026, 11:45 UTC≈4,050 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📉 Как работает понижение магрезиста? В прошлом посте разобрали, как магрезист повышается. Теперь — как он понижается. Главная ошибка игроков — считать это “в лоб”: «У врага 25% сопротивления магии. Сработала 5️⃣ — значит, осталось 18,75% (или вообще 0%).» Нет. В Доте итоговый магрезист обычно считается не прямым вычитанием процентов, а через множитель проходящего магического урона. То есть игра сначала считает, ка

12🔥6👍3

31 Mar 2026, 00:53 UTC≈44,900 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📦 Как на самом деле стакается магрезист? Как ни странно, некоторые до сих пор мыслят так: 25% базового резиста + 20% от 🛒 = 45% Но нет. В Доте это так не работает. Магическое сопротивление стакается мультипликативно. То есть каждая следующая прибавка режет не весь входящий урон, а только тот остаток, который прошёл после предыдущей. Пример с 😶‍🌫️: — базовые 25% резиста = проходит 75% урона — сверху получаем 20% ли

24👍4🔥4

29 Mar 2026, 14:35 UTC≈43,300 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Tiny — абсолютно недооцененный герой патча 7.41a Связка ✔️ и 🛒 у 🏕 выглядит откровенно ненормально. Что изменили: ✔️ — встроенный Crash Landing — +50 урона брошенным деревьям через 5️⃣/6️⃣ — увеличение радиуса AoE-урона с 275 до 400 🛒 — деревья от 6️⃣ получают все бонусы от 3️⃣ То есть каждое дерево от 6️⃣ теперь наносит не только основной урон, но и: — дополнительный урон от 3️⃣ — AoE-урон от 3️⃣, который ещё и

10👍62

28 Mar 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,450 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚠️ Meepo — продолжение "веселья" Что ж, баги с 🏕 и размножением предметов продолжают разгоняться: что-то чинят, а что-то всплывает заново. Одну из таких вариаций я как раз нашёл сегодня утром — после частичного фикса бага, который уже показал СВИТ. Речь про размножение ✔️ с последующей продажей. Что для этого нужно? 1. 🏕 должен получить клона и купить 1 ✔️. 2. Нужен союзник, который купит также одну пачку ✔️. 3.

9

26 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,700 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌸 Essence Distiller: лучший предмет для 4 позиции? Разбираем его функционал Если кратко, то Essence Distiller — это инструмент для контроля территории, безопасной проверки важных зон и нарушения позиционки противника. Он ни в коем случае не является заменой 🌵. Давайте разбираться, где 🌸 реально может быть полезен и в чём его ключевая особенность. 🟠Главная особенность — обзор Это не просто направленный каст по цел

👍1451

25 Mar 2026, 17:06 UTC≈1,580 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Терзатель в обновлении 7.41: смотрим, что изменилось Последние несколько патчей 🔲 был, пожалуй, главным объектом на карте в командной 🦞. О его ценности уже не раз говорили, а результаты команд и их места на турнирах лишь подтверждали это. Кстати, статистику по последним турнирам можете посмотреть у n3ePavliK_. Поэтому в 7.41 Valve подошли к вопросу балансировки Терзателя заметно серьёзнее. Разбираем сухие цифры. 🟠

👍821🫡1

25 Mar 2026, 07:24 UTC≈1,150 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁153

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ShaysOFF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 768,460 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shays[ON]” (@ShaysOFF), 863 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShaysOFF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.