Channel
@SharpFutball
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003457577036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SharpFutball |
| Description | UK'S football intelligence magazine. Smarter bets. 🌍⚽ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SharpFutball |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 35 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 September 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 240 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⚽📚 SHARP SCHOOL — READING BTTS LIKE AN ANALYST ⚽ A simple 5-point check, using Chelsea's season so far ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 THE MYTH "Both teams are decent, so both score." That's not analysis — that's a guess. BTTS isn't about luck. It's about finding the reason two teams will both score. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 THE 5-POINT CHECK — CHELSEA AS THE EXAMPLE Chelsea have had BTTS in 4 of their first 5 Premier League games th…
Sharp Futball pinned a photo
22/23 landed
⚽🔥 UEFA NATIONS LEAGUE — MATCHDAY 1 🔥⚽ *24 September 2026* ⚠️ Card-wide note: No high-conviction plays tonight — every fixture is capped by data-confidence gaps (tactical blackouts or unverified reads). Treat all picks below as directional, not high-conviction. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇦🇩 ANDORRA vs MALTA — League D 📊 Thinnest-sourced match on the card — no H2H, personnel, or tactical data either side. Close to a coin fli…
Channel name was changed to «Sharp Futball»
⚽ MATCHDAY PREVIEWS ⚽ --- 🏟️ Tottenham v Aston Villa 💚 Under 2.5 Goals — Spurs have 0 goals in 4 league games despite solid underlying xG; finishing crisis, not creation. Villa's only goal source all season is dead balls. 💛 BTTS No — Both attacks are misfiring; Villa missing key defensive pieces too (Torres, Maatsen), so it's more a game of who blinks first than a shootout. ♥️ Draw/narrow margin — Two sides feeling…
Sharp Futball pinned «📊 RESULTS RECAP — DAILY FIXTURES 📊 Friday, September 18, 2026 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏴 BRENTFORD 3-0 CHELSEA 📌 Tips: BTTS Yes ❌ | Over 2.5 ✅ | DC Brentford ✅ 🟢 Evidence: STRONG → 2/3 hit 📝 Review: The counter-attack matchup and Chelsea's missing defensive…»
📊 RESULTS RECAP — DAILY FIXTURES 📊 Friday, September 18, 2026 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏴 BRENTFORD 3-0 CHELSEA 📌 Tips: BTTS Yes ❌ | Over 2.5 ✅ | DC Brentford ✅ 🟢 Evidence: STRONG → 2/3 hit 📝 Review: The counter-attack matchup and Chelsea's missing defensive mids were both real — Brentford bagged three. But Chelsea's issues showed up as *toothlessness*, not leakiness at the back too — a clean sheet against, not a sho…
Congratulations to everyone that won tonight.
⚽🔥 DAILY MATCH ANALYSIS — TOP FIXTURES 🔥⚽ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏴 BRENTFORD vs CHELSEA — Premier League, 20:00 📊 Chelsea lead the league for shots/goals conceded on the break — Brentford are built to punish exactly that (3rd for shots, direct play, strong on second balls). Chelsea missing 2 defensive mids (Caicedo, Palestra) compounds it. Last 4 H2H at this venue all drawn. 💚 BTTS – YES 💚 OVER 2.5 GOALS 📌 *Second…
SHARP INTELLIGENCE — Europa League MD1 + La Liga Leverkusen vs Celje and Sunderland vs AZ Alkmaar excluded from this post — a day-old managerial change and a direct England-record-vs-form conflict make both too unresolved to score. 1️⃣ Anderlecht 🇧🇪 vs Lyon 🇫🇷 🕘 Europa League MD1, Lotto Park, 21:00 Both sides are confirmed high-press teams — that symmetry alone tends to open a game up. Anderlecht are also missing t…
An update on our analysis. We have done indepth data analytical modelling and our AI have given us New updated predictions. Thread with caution. Don't stake more than you can afford to lose. Check update below.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SharpFutball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sharp Futball” (@SharpFutball), 35 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SharpFutball.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.