Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
17,400 average views per post against 15,770 subscribers — an engagement rate of 110.6%. Across the 7,490 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,611 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.83% and 17.6%, with a median of 8.86%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
191,850
Mature posts only
110.6% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,764–15,780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:05
15,766
-2
12 Aug 2026, 23:35
15,768
-2
10 Aug 2026, 21:06
15,770
-8
8 Aug 2026, 21:55
15,778
+5
7 Aug 2026, 23:04
15,773
+6
6 Aug 2026, 21:11
15,767
-5
6 Aug 2026, 04:30
15,772
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:25
15,772
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
112.6%
avg views ÷ 15,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,700
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
23 (10 June 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
195,200
Reactions total
2,795
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
216
Videos
112
Links
90
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,531 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,832
69.3%
❤
1,381
25.0%
👎
163
2.95%
🤔
155
2.80%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,867reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔺عضویتی غیر ممکن!
تحلیل سیاسی بیش از هر چیز به نگاهی واقعبینانه به متن رخدادها و روندهای سیاسی نیاز دارد. در همین چارچوب، پس از شکلگیری پیمان دفاعی میان ترکیه، عربستان و پاکستان، موسوم به پیمان مکه، عدهای همچنان با شور و حرارت خاصی، پیوستن ایران به این ائتلاف را راهکاری منطقی میدانند؛ بیآنکه به میزان امکانپذیری آن توجه کنند.
اگرچه ایجاد یک ائتلاف منطقهای علیه اسرائیل، هدفی مطلوب و ضروری است، اما تصور پیوستن …
🔺ایران خود را دعوت کند!
در واکنش به شکلگیری «پیمان دفاعی مکه» میان ترکیه، عربستان و پاکستان، برخی پیشنهاد دادهاند که ایران با رویکردی هوشمندانه، خواستار پیوستن به این ائتلاف شود. اما چنین درخواستی شباهت بسیاری به این دارد که از روسیه خواسته شود برای مهار ناتو به عضویت آن درآید.
اگرچه اعضای پیمان مکه تأکید دارند که ائتلافشان علیه کشور خاصی نیست، اما بدیهی است که این ساختار دفاعی از پیامدهای جنگ منطقهای اخیر با ه…
🔺پیمان دفاعی مکه!
سفر رهبران پاکستان و ترکیه به عربستان و امضای پیمان نظامی مشترک فراتر از یک رویداد دیپلماتیک گذرا، حلقهای از پازل بزرگتر دگرگونیهای امنیتی در خاورمیانه است. چه بسا میزبان این نشست بخواهد از این طریق در بحبوحه تنشهای منطقه پایههای اولیه شکل گیری یک «ناتوی اسلامی» را بنیان نهد.
در دیداری سه جانبه یک پیمان دفاعی مشترک به امضا رسیده که در یک نامگذاری قابل تامل، "پیمان مکه" نام گرفته است. ریاست جم…
🔺از لبه جنگ تا لبه مذاکرات!
شنبه شب که تقریبا همه شواهد و قراین دال بر قریب الوقوع بودن دور دیگری از جنگ بود، ناگهان با اعلام دونالد ترامپ مبنی بر لغو حمله، جریان تحولات معکوس شد و حرف و حدیث از یک توافق احتمالی بالا گرفت. دنیای سیاست به همین اندازه سیال و متغیر است. به همان سرعت ناگهانی که دوباره ریتم اخبار و تحولات از جنگ به سمت دیپلماسی و مذاکرات تغییر پیدا کرد، باز بعید نیست که این وضعیت دوباره به سوی جنگ معکوس …
🔺حمله لغو شد؟!
در حالی که منطقه و جهان در التهاب آغاز دور جدیدی از جنگ به سر میبرد، دونالد ترامپ ناگهان خبر از لغو حمله داد. او این تصمیم را به درخواست ایران و دیگر کشورهای خاورمیانه و توافق بر سر چارچوبهای جدید ربط داد. ترامپ همچنین مدعی شد که این اقدام را به خاطر «منافع آینده جهان» و برای بقای «ایرانی موفق و شکوفا» انجام داده، مشروط بر اینکه توافقی سریع برای بازگشایی فوری، کامل و بدون قید و شرط تنگه هرمز حاصل شو…
🔺در آستانه دور تازه جنگ؟!
شرایط کنونی شباهت زیادی با ایام قبل از دو جنگ اخیر دارد؛ با این تفاوت که قبل از آنها نوعی دیپلماسی و مذاکرات «فریبنده» در جریان بود؛ اما اکنون شاهد یک نوع انسداد دیپلماتیک آشکار هستیم و مذاکراتی هم در جریان نیست.
در کل، مجموعه شواهد و قرائنی نشان میدهد که دور تازهای از جنگ در راه است؛ مگر آنکه طی ساعات یا روزهای آینده، تحول دیپلماتیک غیرمنتظرهای رخ دهد. با این حال، در شرایطی که دیپلماسی…
🔺منطقه در لبه انفجار!
اوضاع خاورمیانه و به ویژه منطقه حساس خلیج فارس، لحظه به لحظه رو به وخامت میرود و رفتهرفته به سمت خطرناکترین و پیچیدهترین فاز خود حرکت میکند که میتوان آن را به مراتب فراتر از جنگ اخیر دانست.
در جریان جنگ، در پی تجاوز نظامی مشترک ایالات متحده و اسرائیل به خاک ایران، دامنه جنگ همانگونه که تهران پیشتر تهدید کرده بود به پهنه منطقه کشیده شد. با این حال، از آنجا که فضای عمومی منطقه شدیداً ت…
🔺دو راهی جنگ و توافق!
دو روز است که حملات آمریکا و به تبع آن، حملات ایران در منطقه متوقف شده یا به عبارتی به حالت تعلیق درآمده است. درباره چرایی این توقف، رسانههای آمریکایی روایتهای متفاوتی مطرح کردهاند. اکسیوس آن را به مذاکرات هیأت عمانی در تهران درباره تنگه هرمز ربط داده و در مقابل، نیویورک تایمز از هشدار مشاوران ارشد ترامپ درباره کاهش ذخایر تسلیحات رهگیر آمریکا به عنوان عامل اصلی نام برده است.
صرف نظر از صحت …
🔺الزیدی و پیام ترامپ!
علی الزیدی، نخستوزیر عراق، در حالی به تهران آمده است که سفر اخیرش به واشنگتن و دیدار با رئیس جمهور آمریکا، موجی از گمانهزنیها را درباره احتمال آوردن یک پیام از ترامپ به راه انداخته است.
با این حال، به عقیده نگارنده، این تقارن زمانی لزوماً به معنای این نیست که حتما حامل چنین پیامی است. اگر الزیدی قرار بود «پیام مهم» رئیسجمهور آمریکا را به تهران برساند، منطقیترین حالت این بود که او بلافاصله…
🔺فینالِ فوتبال و سیاست!
میگویند که فوتبال از سیاست جداست که البته در مقام حرف و کلام سخنی منطقی و دلنشین است و عملا باید همینطور باشد. اما واقعیت این است که فوتبال هم تا حدودی و با شدت و ضعفی به بخشی از سیاست در سطوح داخلی کشورها، منطقهای و بینالمللی تبدیل شده است.
در این راستا به جرأت میتوان گفت که فینال امشب میان آرژانتین و اسپانیا، یکی از سیاسیترین فینالهای تاریخ جام جهانی است. این بازی فراتر از یک مسابقه…
🔺زمانه تهدید نیست!
در شرایطی که ایران عملا وارد یک جنگ فرسایشی و طولانی مدت شده و جنوب کشور به کانون اصلی حملات آمریکا بدل شده است، همچنان سیلی از تهدید، هشدار و خط و نشان کشیدن علیه آمریکا در جریان است. حال آنکه کارکرد اصلی تهدید، بازداشتن طرف مقابل از انجام یک اقدام است. وقتی آن اقدام فعلیت پیدا کند، روشن است که تهدید دیگر اثر بازدارنده خود را ندارد و حتی دیگر نمیتواند کارکرد جنگ روانی هم داشته باشد.
با آغاز…
🔺درگذشت معمار قطر!
در گوشهای دیگر از جهان و در خاورمیانه پرآشوب، شیخ حمد بن خلیفه آل ثانی، امیر پیشین قطر و پدر امیر کنونی آن در سن 74 سالگی درگذشت. او را باید معمار قطرِ نوین دانست که این کشور کوچک و کماثر را با وجود محدودیتهای جغرافیایی و ژئوپلیتکی به بازیگری پرآوازه در سطح منطقه و جهان تبدیل کرد.
آغاز زمامداری امیر سابق قطر در سال 1995 پس از کنار گذاشتن پدرش از قدرت نقطه عطفی در تاریخ این کشور بود. او با تجهی…
👍169❤67👎3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Sgolanbari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Sgolanbari edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 66,462 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نگاهِ دیگر | صابر گلعنبری” (@Sgolanbari), 15,766 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sgolanbari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.