Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сексология@Психология

Channel

Сексология@Психология

@Sexologiya_Psixologiya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

579subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001540313102
TypeChannel
Username@Sexologiya_Psixologiya
DescriptionТГ канал клинического психолога, сексолога. Здесь про: -сексологию, психологию -здоровье - отношения 18+
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 September 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/Sexologiya_Psixologiya

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 09:22579first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 20 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
376
Videos
81
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

227 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7432.6%
🔥4620.3%
💯4318.9%
❤3716.3%
🤔114.85%
👀52.20%
😁52.20%
🤣20.881%
🍓10.441%
🗿10.441%
😍10.441%
🙊10.441%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 12 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Dec 2024, 12:42 UTC≈5,000 views23 reactionsread 29 September 2026

✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️и Комфорт в отношениях На чём базируются и начинаются строиться практически любые отношения? Это влечение и комфорт Можно ли на чем-то одном? Можно, но нужно ли? Многие мужчины могут себе позволить отношения только на комфорте к партнеру. А многие женщины без влечения, не могут себе позволить отношений. Многие, но не все. И если с комфортом все примерно понятно, то давайте посмотрим, что же это т…

❤13👍6💯2🔥2

11 Dec 2024, 08:38 UTC≈4,190 views13 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂🍂 для женщин. Мужчины, пост для Вас. Вот такого вампира из меня сделал искусственный интелект)) мне кажется клыки большие? Как Вам? 😅🙈 Женщины прекрасно знают, что такое драконы для мужчин и зачем они их применяют. Обычно, по классике (ну так советуют разные коучи по отношениям и т.д) что в начале, нужно "проверить" на сколько мужчина серьёзно относится к женщине, создавая ИССКУСТВЕННО разные сложные ситуаци…

🔥7🤣2😁2❤1👍1

7 Dec 2024, 11:15 UTC≈2,730 views16 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Каждый человек - уникален. И для каждого будет что-то свое "самое страшное" в эмоциональном плане. Одно из самых тяжёлых вещей это ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ Самые жестокие манипуляции проявляются именно через безразличие. Игнор - туда же. Посмотрите на ваших детей или вспомните себя ребёнком. Дети, могу спокойно воспринимать когда на них кричат (если к этому привыкли) когда их наказывают, так как агрессия это действия…

💯10❤3🔥3

2 Dec 2024, 13:04 UTC≈2,730 views58 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Poll

Поболтаем? Что самое страшное для человека в эмоциональном плане? Как считаете?

  1. Ненависть19%
  2. Агрессия24%
  3. Безразличие45%
  4. Злость12%
  5. Обида17%
  6. Манипуляции23%
  7. Игнорирование24%
  8. Свой вариант6%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍33🤔10🔥7👀5😁3

30 Nov 2024, 19:14 UTC≈2,610 views46 reactionsread 29 September 2026

▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ отсутствием секса.... Пост- спонтанный, уж как-то сильно фонит эта тема в поле... Часто сталкиваюсь с тем, что женщина "наказывает" мужчину/мужа/любовника - не важно отсутствием с ней секса. Я обиделась, секса не будет. Пока не попросит прощения/извинится/купит цветы/духи/трусы... кому что. Давайте так, если Вы любовница, и "наказали" мужчину сексом. 2-3 раза такого наказания, и …

💯23❤12🔥8👍3

27 Nov 2024, 10:21 UTC≈2,380 views40 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Сверяясь с планами на посты, здесь должно быть что-то из серии, как расстаться с любовницей (для мужчин) Но перед тем, как с ней расставаться, давайте обсудим, почему женщины вступают в такие отношения? Какие мысли у них в голове? На что рассчитывают? Итак, классическая схема. Женатый мужчина и любовница. ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ ▪️ ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ В основном, у женщин идут два посыла. Их всего 2!!! Есть ещё трети…

👍28💯7🔥5

26 Nov 2024, 09:17 UTC≈1,830 views10 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Колесо Вартенберга Подходит для разнообразия Ваших ощущений с партнёром 🫦 И конечно, же, тем, кто в теме бдсм. Бывают разного вида. Мне больше симпатична нержавеющая сталь и один ряд зубчиков. Для тех, кто никогда не пробовал, рекомендую именно этот вариант. Уровень нажима - смотрите сами, по ощущениям. Если, Вам доверяет Ваш партнёр - завяжите ему глаза. Так будет острее восприятие 💕... Можно чередовать с приятным…

🔥6❤2🤔1🙊1

20 Nov 2024, 14:59 UTC≈1,800 views12 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @etovozbuditelnoPhoto

😛 Смело, сенсуально и местами загадочно: удивительный мир картин кореянки Джойс Ли, которую называют Сальвадором Дали нового тысячелетия. Это возбудительно 😱! #гедонируем

❤4👍3🔥3🍓1😍1

20 Nov 2024, 07:21 UTC≈1,660 views9 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

В страсти нет Разума....плоть не зависит от Рассудка.... и поэтому влечение Невозможно контролировать.... его можно лишь временно Подавлять и Сдерживать....но игнорировать Невозможно.... и чем дольше вы стремитесь Удержать эту слабость.... тем Сильнее она Становится.... и тем Безумней будет Взрыв....!! Billy Milligan Согласны? 🫦

🔥5❤2💯1🗿1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Sexologiya_Psixologiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Dec 2024, 13:04 UTCAnonymous Poll109 voters

Поболтаем? Что самое страшное для человека в эмоциональном плане? Как считаете?

  1. Ненависть19%
  2. Агрессия24%
  3. Безразличие45%
  4. Злость12%
  5. Обида17%
  6. Манипуляции23%
  7. Игнорирование24%
  8. Свой вариант6%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 12 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Inna Matisson ИННА МАТИССОН
@Inna_Matisson · 34,186
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сексология@Психология” (@Sexologiya_Psixologiya), 579 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sexologiya_Psixologiya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.