Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ↪️SexoLogistica🍒 18+

Channel

↪️SexoLogistica🍒 18+

@SexoLogistica

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,742subscribers

-475 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882699927
TypeChannel
Username@SexoLogistica
Description🔞Просматривая канал, вы подтверждаете свой возраст 18+. . Канал строго 18+. 😉 . Анатомия и физиология процессов взаимодействия через призму восприятия автора. . Околонаучные рассуждения. @AsGuest - ЛС
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SexoLogistica

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7427,2196,980.56 August 2026 — 7,217 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,219 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,208 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,167 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,135 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,119 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,101 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,081 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,076 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,041 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,034 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,009 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,986 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,983 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,942 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,911 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,888 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,873 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,858 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,844 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,830 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,814 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,805 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,794 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,784 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,767 subscribers13 November 2026 — 6,742 subscribers6 August 202613 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 99 days, net -475. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,670–7,291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 10:056,742-25
8 Nov 2026, 14:066,767-17
5 Nov 2026, 11:476,784-10
2 Nov 2026, 17:356,794-11
30 Oct 2026, 08:276,805-9
27 Oct 2026, 14:396,814-16
24 Oct 2026, 15:566,830-14
21 Oct 2026, 05:116,844-14
18 Oct 2026, 12:286,858-15
15 Oct 2026, 22:366,873-15
13 Oct 2026, 04:166,888-23
6 Oct 2026, 18:206,911-31
30 Sept 2026, 01:156,942-41
19 Sept 2026, 10:376,983-3
15 Sept 2026, 08:166,986-23
11 Sept 2026, 06:197,009-25
6 Sept 2026, 16:377,034-7
2 Sept 2026, 08:427,041-35
30 Aug 2026, 12:567,076-5
27 Aug 2026, 21:047,081first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.43%
avg views ÷ 6,742 subscribers
Avg views / post
366
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held21 (29 May 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total366
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
495
Videos
9
Links
613

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

517 reactions across 21 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14127.3%
❤6713.0%
🤣519.86%
🍌377.16%
👍356.77%
🙈346.58%
🤷346.58%
🗿234.45%
custom 5353066170503142084173.29%
🥰152.90%
😁132.51%
😈112.13%
🌭91.74%
🍾91.74%
😱50.967%
🍓40.774%
🤔40.774%
👎20.387%
💯20.387%
🙉20.387%
2 further kinds20.387%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SexoLogistica. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 May 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 11:42 UTC366 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @MassagisticaPhoto

Куда пропал? В 24/7 очень сложно уместить 2 работы, 2 учебы, курсы по повышению квалификации и практику в больнице (а где ещё можно живой мозг увидеть🧠), и сон😂. Прошу простить🫰 Но записаться можно: Отзывы 👉 здесь. Противопоказания 👉 здесь. Навигация по каналу 👉 здесь. Связь 👉Сергей (Massagistica). 🧴Massagistica👏- магия рук и никакого мошенничества

🔥8🥰3custom 53530661705031420842❤1

26 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC≈3,360 views30 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Надеть, снять и не встрять. В статье «ВИЧ. Презерватив не спасет?! (часть 1), (часть 2)». Я дал для себя исчерпывающий ответ, как и почему это изделие способно защитить нас во время полового акта. Вплоть до обоснования разницы размеров вируса и пор изделия (напоминаю, вирус в 50 раз меньше поры контрацептива). Какие ошибки мы допускаем при использовании презерватива? 1. Не используем презерватив. 2. Разрываем упа…

🔥17❤7👎2🥰2custom 53530661705031420842

26 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,440 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Всемирный день контрацепции 💦💦💦💦💦 #OffТоп ↪️SexoLogistica🍒18+

🤣4🌭3🍌3❤1

4 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC≈4,230 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Всемирный день сексуального здоровья. На прошлой неделе вышла новость (за достоверность не ручаюсь, но теоретически такое возможно) о том, как гражданин, имея положительный ВИЧ-статус, спокойно имел незащищённые половые акты с подругами, с одной из них он встречался несколько месяцев. А вскрылось всё в момент ссоры. За подобные деяния человеку может грозить срок до 1 года, так как, по факту, нет доказательств, что …

🔥8❤4👍4🎉1💯1😱1🙈1

19 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈4,650 views46 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Есть два вида члена😯. Первый вид при эрекции расширяется и удлиняется ("grower"). Второй вид кажется большим сразу, но становится ненамного больше при эрекции ("shower"). Международный журнал "Men`s Health" сообщил, что 79 процентов мужчин относятся к первому виду и 21 - ко второму. А у вас или вашего партнёра какой? 🍌 - Grower 🌭 - Shower. #НеФакт ↪️SexoLogistica🍒

🍌33🌭6🤣5❤1💯1

6 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC≈5,520 views31 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🎉Сегодня международный день подкаблучника👠. Есть 2 вида подкаблучников: 1. Делают всё из-за страха расстроить свою девушку. 2. Делают всё из-за желания порадовать свою девушку. Вроде цель идентична. А побудитель разный. А вам нравится, когда мужчина подкаблучник? 👍 - за вариант 1. ❤️ - за вариант 2. 😁 - не нравится. #offТоп ↪️SexoLogistica🍒

❤16😁8🤣4👍3

5 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈4,980 views40 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🤷Я не знаю, что сказать. Я просто оставлю это здесь. 👍🏼 - Гениально 🔥 - Где купить? 🙈 - Мне нужна такая формочка 😈 - Я знаю, кому это отправить) ↪️SexoLogistica🍒18+

🤣20😈10🔥6👍2🙉2

24 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈5,460 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Доброго дня👋. Сегодня Всемирный день БДСМ. Поэтому достаем свои аксессуары и делаем нашу повседневную жизнь чуточку ярче😂. А у вас есть специфические девайсы дома? 🍾 - Конечно есть. И даже больше 3 штук 🍓 - Есть парочка 🍌 - Одной пока хватает 🤔 - Задумаюсь, чтобы взять 🗿 - Мне и без них хорошо #offТоп ↪️SexoLogistica🍒18+

🍾9🤣4🍓3🤔3❤1🍌1🤗1😈1

19 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC≈5,300 views31 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Чем больше попа, тем меньше боли при анальном сексе (Миф). Сексологи опровергли этот факт проведя эксперимент🧐 с участием 25 девушек с большой попой и 25 девушек с маленькой. С анатомической точки зрения сфинктеру всё равно, какая попа его окружает. 3 основополагающих фактора для данного вида секса: желание, готовность и доверие обоих партнёров. А вы такое утверждение слышали? 🙈 - Да 🤷 - Нет 🗿 - Да кому это инте…

🤷23😁4🙈4

17 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC≈4,820 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026

🦻🏼Ээээх, молодёжь!👴🏼 Неудачный секс, или как строптивость зумера довела до госпитализации. 20-летняя жительница столицы встречалась с ровесником, и в один из первых разов их гормонального соития парень так поверил в себя, что "с разбегу" вошёл не в ту дверь. Последствия: госпитализация, разрыв кишечника и сильное кровотечение😱. А вам интересно, что думает медик по поводу АС? 🔥 - Очень 🗿 - Не очень 🤔 - А что ново…

🔥18🙈3😱2

13 Jul 2026, 05:15 UTC≈4,590 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Утро. Кофе☕. Как кофе влияет на сексуальную жизнь? Из исследований следует: для человека, не имеющего противопоказаний, кофе благотворно влияет на либидо и тонус. Речь идёт о натуральном кофе. Сублимированный тоже имеет положительный эффект, но он значительно уступает натуральному. Во-первых, кофе влияет на эндокринную систему, повышая выработку половых гормонов🥰. Особенно в холодном виде. Во-вторых, кофе повыша…

🔥11👍3🤣2❤1

12 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈4,010 views23 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Утренний секс. По роду своей деятельности, я часто встречаюсь с вопросом: " А нужен ли нам (мне) секс по утрам?" И ответ на него очень прост. Не так быстро😉. Для начала разберём его с двух сторон. Официальная: 1. 😴 Он разбудит лучше, чем кофе. 2. 🫀 Он полезен для сердца. 3. 🤧 Он защищает вас от простуд и инфекций. 4. 🧗 Он поможет сжечь калории. 5. 🤢 Он лучшее средство от похмелья. 6. 🥹 Это просто великолепно и в…

🔥14👍3custom 53530661705031420843❤1🤔1🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @SexoLogistica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @SexoLogistica as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“↪️SexoLogistica🍒 18+” (@SexoLogistica), 6,742 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SexoLogistica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.