Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

70+ BIS & CS lvl 5

@SeventyPlusBIS5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002226150633
TypeChannel
Username@SeventyPlusBIS5
DescriptionOfficial BIS & CS Level 5 70+ Family Channel For academic updates and communication. University-wide news → @SeventyPlus @SeventyPlusECO5 @SeventyPlusFIN5 @SeventyPlusBM5 @SeventyPlusLAW5 Those who are interested can also join 👍
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SeventyPlusBIS5

Growth

1167 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:18116no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:29116first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2130.9%
1522.1%
🍾811.8%
👍57.35%
🥰57.35%
🔥45.88%
😁34.41%
😱22.94%
11.47%
👌11.47%
💯11.47%
🤝11.47%
🫡11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2025 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Apr 2026, 07:35 UTC163 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

OS marks are out @SeventyPlusBIS5

❤‍🔥31👍1

Signed shahruh 🧑🏻‍💻

5 Apr 2026, 12:23 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @SeventyPlusECO5

Dear Economics with Data science students, Take a deep breath and see the VIVA SLOTS via this LINK! Please check this link regularly, since there might be some changes in dates and times, and prepare accordingly! Good luck to everyone! @SeventyPlusECO5🫶🏻

1

Signed Violetta Aganova

31 Mar 2026, 09:33 UTC695 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

No DWV classes this week - only test on Thursday Confirmed by Shirin Primkulova @SeventyPlusBIS5

🍾5🥰31👍1

Signed shahruh

27 Mar 2026, 15:22 UTC297 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Only questions regarding the CW will be asked. You are expected to demonstrate and explain functionality of your script. Feedback from Dmitriy Pochitaev regarding Viva @SeventyPlusBIS5

❤‍🔥1🍾1

Signed shahruh

27 Mar 2026, 04:23 UTC303 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

OS Viva is today and tomorrow - check Outlook @SeventyPlusBIS5

👍2🍾1👌1🫡1

Signed shahruh

26 Mar 2026, 11:17 UTC624 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

DWV Module Exam Dear students We will have our test on April 2nd Thursday from 6 to 8 pm. The test is online test but you need to remain online during the test until your text is submitted. You cannot use pseudo names or alias. You need to log into the session with your wiut credentials. We will send you the link one day before the exam date. You can be physically anywhere, you can use any programing environmen

1🍾1🥰1

Signed shahruh

25 Mar 2026, 16:38 UTC179 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dear BIS and CS Students, I am pleased to announce that WIUT Computing programmes are now an official partner of Red Hat Academy. This gives you free access to industry-recognised Red Hat courses, labs, and learning resources. I strongly encourage you to register and explore the available courses. These courses are online and available to students at all year levels. Final-year students, in particular, may want to

❤‍🔥51👍1

Signed shahruh

24 Mar 2026, 04:05 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Marks on Network Operations are out - check on intranet's coursework feedback page @SeventyPlusBIS5

❤‍🔥21💯1

Signed shahruh

18 Mar 2026, 07:34 UTC197 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Those who have Network Operations seminar today - it starts on second floor of ATB near the staircase The class begins with a trip to server room

3

Signed shahruh

10 Mar 2026, 11:36 UTC270 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Some offtopic news - now, gym has female hours (Tuesday & Thursday) from 14.00 to 15.00. In case you needed

❤‍🔥4😁2

Signed shahruh

2 Mar 2026, 04:27 UTC322 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

For those taking DVW! There is a rumor from students taking Intro to AI that in the coursework, there is a hidden phrase/word that will affect the code and therefore show that you have uploaded a coursework descriptor file to a LLM. The same could be in DVW module Please, take note not to fully send it, but create your own synopsis to send to LLM to avoid any issues in the summer @SeventyPlusBIS5

2❤‍🔥1😁1😱1

Signed shahruh

10 Jan 2026, 17:37 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

OOP marks are out! Go to Intranet's feedback page @SeventyPlusBIS5

🔥4❤‍🔥32🥰1😱1

Signed shahruh

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SeventyPlusBIS5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 537,254 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“70+ BIS & CS lvl 5” (@SeventyPlusBIS5), 116 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeventyPlusBIS5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.