Channel
@Seraphlaser_B1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003981852570 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Seraphlaser_B1 |
| Created | 10 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Seraphlaser_B1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 27 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 27 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (10 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 377 |
| Reactions total | 72 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 14 | 18.2% | |
| 🦄 | 14 | 18.2% | |
| 🎃 | 13 | 16.9% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 16.9% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.79% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Seraphlaser_B1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
👤_ Seraph.laser: ⌨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ᅠᅠ「 👁」— Пока мы не отправились на прогулку, да и планируем завтра... Но всё-равно сегодня мы получим новые впечатления ᅠᅠᅠ— Спасибо этому инферналу, которые так любезно поделились с нами ягодой ᅠᅠᅠ— Арбуз! Именно его мы сегодня будет пробовать, ведь ранее никогда с ним не сталкивались ᅠ Считайте это до. Судя по описаниям инфернала, арбуз довольно сладкий и... Вкусный ᅠᅠᅠ— Сейчас буду пыта…
🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
👤_ Seraph.laser: ⌨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ᅠᅠ「 👁」— Мы щас как-то сидели и думали... А может быть всё-таки пройтись по другим регионам, не смотря на наше отвращение к ним. Вдруг наше отношение было предвзятым ᅠᅠᅠ— Будем считать, что того разговора с Вайндфорс не было, и нам никто не портил настроение ᅠᅠᅠ— Если будет интересно, то мы сможем вам рассказать о наших впечатлениях ────── ᅠᅠᅠ— ...
🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
👤_ Seraph.laser: ⌨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ᅠᅠ「 👁」— Да-да, нам на самом деле плевать на остальных сестер, если они не представляют для нас ничего, будем честны ᅠᅠᅠ— К тому же мы собираемся с тобой поговорить о довольно важных темах. По поводу СФОТХ ᅠ Надеемся, ты поймёшь и выделишь для нас особое время ────── ᅠᅠᅠ— ...
🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
👤_ Seraph.laser: ⌨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ ᅠᅠ「 👁」— Вы просто посмотрите насколько он милый. Лучше и послушнее друга мы не видели ᅠᅠᅠ Кстати, эти крылышки на голове мы сделали ему сами сегодня. Весь день пытались создать ему удобный головной убор ᅠᅠᅠ— Теперь Ангелок ещё больше похож на нас, не прекрасны ли мы с ним? .... ᅠᅠᅠ— Ойй, нам на запрос ответили, а мы и не заметили. Что ж, не наша проблема ────── ᅠᅠᅠ— ...
🐳2💘2🦄2🎃1
_ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Мы так подумали... Не сказать, чтобы мы устали за этот день. Пусть и провели столько времени, стараясь над нашей чулеснейшней видео инструкцией, но сил у нас осталось на еще одну небольшую прогулку... ᅠХотя правильнее сказать встречу ᅠᅠᅠ— Мы заметили, что еще одно создание божеств ведёт блог. Так значит ты довольно открыта, в отличие от других наблюдателей?.? ᅠᅠᅠ— Хах, ла…
❤2🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
_ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Мы монтировали это видео весь день.. О боже, оно ведь вышло идеальным!.! ᅠНаше время определено было потрачено не зря ᅠᅠᅠ— В жизни бы мы не рассказали секрет нашей неотразимости, но для верных подписчиков можем сделать исключение ────── ᅠᅠᅠ— ...
🔥5❤2🎉2🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
╭───────────────╮ ᅠАнонимное ᅠᅠᅠ сообщение ; ᅠᅠ— ... ╰───────────────╯ _ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Мы... Мы без понятия, что вы от нас ждете.. — Что ж... Ам... Мы с подписью Сабспейс? Страннее сообщение в жизни не видели. Мы, вроде как, представились в главном посте. Да и как нас можно было спутать с каким-то инженером из Блэкрока ᅠДаже есл…
❤2🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
_ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Охх, вы такие молодцы, мы даже не сомневались в вас. Ответ был очевиден, но мы жаждали взглянуть на вашу страсть и интерес к нам ᅠКто ставит эти глупые реакции... Боже ᅠᅠᅠ— Тогда мы поспешим, чтобы снять вам видео, а так же смонтировать его. Все же в кадре мы должны быть неотразимы. Ждите, мои птенчики ────── ᅠᅠᅠ— ...
🥰3❤1🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
Posted without readable text
❤1🎃1🐳1💘1🦄1
_ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Пусть мы никогда и не интересовались политикой, но порасуждать можно ᅠᅠᅠ— Мы уверены, что тебе, как инферналу из Блэкрока, точно будут относится в Плейграунде с большим неуважением ᅠМы вообще слышали, что на выходцев, вроде тебя, чуть ли не охоту готов начать ᅠᅠᅠ— А по поводу ньюспавнов мы уверены, что это часть воспитания. Как никак, у каждого региона свои правила 'поведения' …
❤1🎃1🐳1🦄1
_ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Охх, что это. Уже нам на почту пишут? Даже не сомневались, что наш образ так быстро приманил аудиторию ╭───────────────╮ ᅠАнонимное ᅠᅠᅠ сообщение ; ᅠᅠᅠ— Это правда? ╰───────────────╯ _ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Охх... Мы конечно понимаем, что давно не появлялись на улицах Перекрестка... Но это не значит, что у нас есть страх к социализации!.! Кхм... Если бы мы боя…
💘2❤1🎃1🐳1🦄1
_ Seraph.laser ───────────── ᅠᅠ 「𖡨」— Наконец мы смогли пройти эту регистрацию, она была уж слишком затянутой. Эта глупая система не верила, что мы являемся живым существом, а не какими-то искусственным созданием... Тфю... Кто создавал эту глупую систему?? ᅠᅠᅠ— Что же, хочу поприветствовать уже многочисленных зрителей. Мы даже не сомневались, что наберем такую аудиторию за жалкий час Вдвдщыхы ᅠᅠᅠлвлчдыдвжжжв ᅠᅠᅠ— Ой…
❤1🎃1🐳1🔥1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Seraphlaser_B1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 926,070 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚛 𓂀 𝚌𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚌𝚑 ꒱” (@Seraphlaser_B1), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Seraphlaser_B1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.