Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SequaliZer Arabia (Leaked)

Channel

SequaliZer Arabia (Leaked)

@SequaliZer_Arabia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

931subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001637000547
TypeChannel
Username@SequaliZer_Arabia
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SequaliZer_Arabia

Growth

9319379347 August 2026 — 937 subscribers7 August 2026 — 937 subscribers8 August 2026 — 935 subscribers15 August 2026 — 931 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 930–938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:04931-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:26935-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:33937no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:14937first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
533.3%
🤨533.3%
👍320.0%
🤔213.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2024 to 4 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jan 2026, 12:17 UTC424 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fxmind_ai

⚡️ Welcome to FxMind.ai ⚡️ Build Your Own AI Trader ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ We're thrilled to have you here! FxMind.ai is the platform that puts YOU in control of your trading AI. What Makes Us Different? Unlike signal providers, YOU build the AI. Your rules. Your strategy. Full transparency. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎯 KEY FEATURES 🤖 Custom AI Prompts Write your own logic or choose from 14 expert

2

30 Dec 2024, 18:03 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 7 August 2026

التحديث الاخير للأسواق قبل نهاية السنة 🙋🏽‍♂️

30 Dec 2024, 14:58 UTC≈1,700 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣تذكير: لمحاضرة اليوم لكوتش عادل خبير الـ SK system عنوان المحاضرة: تحديث أسواق عام Time : 7:00 pm 🇪🇺 9:00 pm 🇯🇴🇸🇦 🌐 Online on zoom application 🌐 كونوا معنا على الموعد 🤩❗️

🤨4👍2

23 Dec 2024, 17:36 UTC≈1,350 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مرحبا معكن كوتش عادل، حاتطر الغي حصة اليوم، والنا لقاء على منصة الديسكورد بجلسة سؤال وجواب خلال اليومين المقبلين 🙋🏻‍♂️🙋🏻‍♂️

2🤔2👍1

23 Dec 2024, 16:34 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣تذكير: لمحاضرة اليوم لكوتش عادل خبير الـ SK system عنوان المحاضرة: تحليل اسواق Time : 7:00 pm 🇪🇺 9:00 pm 🇯🇴🇸🇦 🌐 Online on zoom application 🌐 كونوا معنا على الموعد 🤩❗️

19 Dec 2024, 18:01 UTC902 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خمس دقايق ومنبلش الرابط 👇👇

19 Dec 2024, 16:29 UTC835 viewsread 7 August 2026

يعطيكم العافية جميعاً حصة اليوم حتكون عمنصة الديسكورد بفقرة سؤال وجواب ومشاركة شاشة من قبل الطلاب اللينك بينزل قبل الحصة بعشر دقائق Time: 8:00pm 🇪🇺 9:00pm 🇯🇴🇸🇦

16 Dec 2024, 16:31 UTC826 viewsread 7 August 2026

📣 يعطيكم العافية جميعاً اليوم ما حيكون في محاضرة لكوتش عادل وسيتم تعويضها بحصة ديسكورد، سيتم الإعلان عنها قريباً

12 Dec 2024, 15:41 UTC879 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📣تذكير: لمحاضرة اليوم لكوتش عادل خبير الـ SK system عنوان المحاضرة: تحديث اسواق الكريبتو Time : 7:00 pm 🇪🇺 9:00 pm 🇯🇴🇸🇦 🌐 Online on zoom application 🌐 كونوا معنا على الموعد 🤩❗️

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SequaliZer_Arabia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,961 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SequaliZer Arabia (Leaked)” (@SequaliZer_Arabia), 931 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SequaliZer_Arabia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.