Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

9-11 Videos, Memes + Proofs

@September11Proofs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796802519
TypeChannel
Username@September11Proofs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/September11Proofs

Growth

3676 Aug 2026, 22:03 — 367 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:11 — 367 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:037 Aug 2026, 13:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 13:11367no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:03367first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 367 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held19 (16 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,101
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏266.7%
👍133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC153 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

The 9/11 Plane & No Plane debate settled Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001 Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-the-plane-no-plane-argument

29 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC170 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

They Showed Us Free Energy Technology on Live Television A response to Howard Switzer — Why exposing what really happened on 9/11 threatens the entire scarcity paradigm Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/they-showed-us-free-energy-technology

26 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC124 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheParanormiesPresentVideo

9/11 predictive images in media. There are hundreds if not thousands of these. @TheParanormiesPresent

24 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC163 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Lies inna de Skies - DJ SHAMUKUNI Source: https://suno.com/song/2c00c63f-7e4a-4ea1-93c7-28eef8f432f0 PS: YouTube already removed the video for “hate speech”.

22 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC178 viewsread 6 August 2026

The Threshold of Reality: One Man’s Artistic Assault on the 9/11 Official Story Richard Shinn’s RealityAXIS channel challenges everything you thought you knew about September 11. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-threshold-of-reality-one-mans

10 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC306 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-operation-reason-building-7-didnt The 9/11 Building 7 HOAX Building 7 did NOT go down to fire or explosives. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-building-7-hoax-video-of-2011

9 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC255 viewsread 6 August 2026

The 9/11 Truth the Government Buried | Ft. Patricia Casazza Patricia Casazza Lost her Husband John in the 9/11 Attacks on The World Trade Center. She joins TY to Discuss her Long Journey, From A Family Frozen in time, to A Weaponized Voice, Demanding Answers and Accountability from the US Government. Patricia Became One of the Famous 'Jersey Girls' A group of widows demanding An Investigatory body into what happen

7 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC193 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Steel Towers vs. Aluminium Planes: The Physics That Failed on 9/11 Expert pilot reveals the crashes that broke every rule in the book. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-fantasy-flights-on-911

👏1

6 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC186 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Where did the planes go AFTER 9/11? The FBI and NTSB have no records to prove that the plane wreckage that was found is that of ANY of the four planes. Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/where-did-the-planes-go-on-911

6 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC174 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Exposed: 9/11 Plane Cgi Disinformation Explaining the Impossible Crash Physics and those spreading disinformation about the alleged planes at the WTC Clip from: 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality Video clip: https://rumble.com/v7cbuq6-exposed-911-plane-cgi-disinformation.html

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @September11Proofs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“9-11 Videos, Memes + Proofs” (@September11Proofs), 367 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/September11Proofs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.