احساس می کنم "کسی که نیست" "کسی که هست" را از پا در میآورد.. #گروس_عبدالملکیان
❤3

Channel
@SepidarPoetry
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
330subscribers
+120 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004364732356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SepidarPoetry |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SepidarPoetry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 330 | -38 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 368 | +158 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 210 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 September 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,948 |
| Reactions total | 127 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
127 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 53.5% | |
| 💔 | 27 | 21.3% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 8.66% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.72% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
احساس می کنم "کسی که نیست" "کسی که هست" را از پا در میآورد.. #گروس_عبدالملکیان
❤3
قصدم نشستن بود، اما کنارت، نه چشم انتظارت قصدم شکستن غرورم بود، اما در آغوشت، نه زیر پایت قصدم زندگی بود، اما با تو، نه با خاطراتت قصدم پیر شدن بود اما به پایت، نه به دستت... #قیصر_امین_پور
💔7👍4❤1
صبر بر جور رقیبت چه کنم گر نکنم؟ همه دانند که در صحبت گل خاری هست.. #سعدی
❤8
در تنگنایِ حیرتم از نِخوتِ رقیب یا رب! مباد آن که گدا معتبر شود.. #حافظ
❤9
گر به خلوت دیدمی او را به جایی سیر سیر بیرقیبش، دادمی من بوسههایی سیر سیر #مولانا رقیب: محافظ، از ریشه مراقبت است، غلامی که در قدیم بانوان را هنگام خروج از خانه همراهی و محافظت میکرده.
❤5
دوشینه به من این همه دشنام که دادی پاداش دعایی است که بر جان تو کردم.. #فروغی_بسطامی
❤4💔4
با دستِ بلورین تو پنجه نتوان کرد رفتیم دعا گفته و دشنام شنیده #سعدی
❤4💔3
خُنُک آن قماربازی که بباخت آنچه بودش بِنَماند هیچش الّا، هوس قمار دیگر... #مولانا این بیت خیلی محشره؛ بله! دم اونی گرم که هزار بار افتاد ولی باز هم بلند شد و به تلاشش ادامه داد.. شاید در ظاهر شکست خورده ولی تو ذهنش نه!
❤5👍1🔥1
هر چه به گرد خویشتن، مینگرم در این چمن آینهی ضمیر من، جز تو نمیدهد نشان #سایه #سیاه_مشق
🕊5❤1👌1
شاید که کند به زنده در گور در عهد تو هر که دختر آورد #سعدی
❤5
حافظا شاید اگر در طلبِ گوهرِ وصل دیده دریا کُنم از اشک و در او غوطه خورم #حافظ شاید: از مصدر شایستن، شایسته است
❤7
فنجانِ آب فنچ هایم را عوض کردم و ریختم در چینهجایِ خُردشان ارزَن وان سویتر ماندم محو تماشاشان. دیدم که مثل هر همیشه، باز، سویاسوی هی میپرند از میله تا میله با رَفرفهی آرام پرهاشان. گفتم چه سود از پر زدن، در تنگنایی اینچنین بسته؟ که بالهاتان میشود خسته گفتند و با فریادِ شاداشاد: "زان میپریم، اینجا که میترسیم پروازمان روزی رود از یاد" #شفیعی_کدکنی
🕊6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SepidarPoetry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سپیدار🌱” (@SepidarPoetry), 330 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SepidarPoetry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.