Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SƎNSΞ LIFΞ

@SenseLifeBR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004321566647
TypeChannel
Username@SenseLifeBR
Descriptioncr на арте
Created24 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SenseLifeBR

Growth

611 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers11 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:016no change
11 Aug 2026, 01:456first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
583.3%
avg views ÷ 6 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held9 (24 June 202615 July 2026)
Views total35
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5454365405130810498350.0%
custom 5257987903945986017233.3%
🔥116.7%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[⭐️] -Глитч кинул спойлер обложки на новую главу и название. Дата выхода пока не известна, но расчёт будет на август. #новости :: #влд (cr: GlitchTellend on X and Glitch_Tellend on Instagram)

custom 52579879039459860171custom 54543654051308104981

30 Jun 2026, 22:06 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

❌❌— 🤩𝒱𝒾𝒹𝑒𝑜🤩—❌❌ cr: myl_bernardo on Instagram #видео :: #адм

custom 52579879039459860171

29 Jun 2026, 20:01 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

[😏] — если вы хотите почитать перевод данного комикса на русском языке, то оставлю вам ссылку на перевод, автором этого перевода является Евангелие, и он переводит этот комикс до сих пор! поддержите его, подписавшись на его тгк! #перевод :: #адм

🔥1custom 54543654051308104981

25 Jun 2026, 22:34 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩➖➖➖ ➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➿➿➿ # 🌟🌟🌟🌟 ❤️ ⦅#вп #новости #арт⦆ ⦅#эдит #мем #влд #адм⦆ ⦅#видео #предложка #перевод⦆ 🌟• со временем, будут пополняться!! 🤩 (cr: UrutauStudio on X)

custom 54543654051308104981

25 Jun 2026, 22:32 UTC59 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖🤩🤩🤩➖➖ ➖➖ ➖➖🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟: ➖➖ [🚜/⭐️] - шарк (он/его) - владелец [👾/🥣] - нэгл (он/его) - админ [🎁/🕷️] - кристоф (он/его) - админ (cr: GlitchTellend on X and Glitch_Tellend on Instagram)

25 Jun 2026, 22:30 UTC63 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖➖🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖ ➖➖➖🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟: • оскорблять человека запрещено, последует словесное предупреждение, во второй раз - бан. оски разрешены только, если это в шутку и по согласию • спамить и засорять чат запрещено, например рекламой, последует бан • нсфв и другой контент, который может быть неприятен глазу человека, ставить под блюр и предупреждать, если не будет, то сообщение будет удалено • со временем, правила мог

25 Jun 2026, 22:26 UTC66 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖➖➖🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖➖🤩🤩🤩 ➖🌟🌟—🌟🌟🌟🌟(🌟+) 🥹 не поддерживаем каналы, с которыми делаем вп🥹 🥹 можем отказать, не назвав причину🥹 🥹 время обозначается МСК 🥹 🥹 вп держится один день 🥹 🥹 перерыв между постами 5 минут, чистятся каждые 2 дня 🥹 🥹🥹🥹рт-пост ❤️ (cr: @PauloMarcelo16 on X)

25 Jun 2026, 22:25 UTC555 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ➖➖🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩➖ ➖➖🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➖➖➖➖🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➖➖➖➖ Тихий мальчик Ной ищет смысл своей жизни, но его серые будни меняются после встречи с наркоманом Калебом, за голову которого назначена большая награда. ❗️Предупреждение: Не советуется читать слабонервным. В данном произведении присутсвуют крайне жестокие сцены физического насилия, происходит касание тем сексуальных близостей, чрезмерная нецензурная лексика. Данный канал пр

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @SenseLifeBR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 276,532 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SƎNSΞ LIFΞ” (@SenseLifeBR), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SenseLifeBR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.