Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ᴇᴄʜᴏᴇs ᴏғ ᴍʏ ᴍɪɴᴅ

@SeniorIDE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

525subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003179211964
TypeChannel
Username@SeniorIDE
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SeniorIDE

Growth

5255355307 Aug 2026, 19:35 — 535 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:49 — 535 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:37 — 525 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:358 Aug 2026, 09:37
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 524–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:37525-10
8 Aug 2026, 03:49535no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:35535first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
130.2%
avg views ÷ 525 subscribers
Avg views / post
683
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (24 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total9,567
Reactions total114
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍾3429.8%
🤣1916.7%
💘1210.5%
119.65%
🔥108.77%
👍97.89%
🐳54.39%
💊32.63%
👀21.75%
👏21.75%
🥰21.75%
🦄21.75%
❤‍🔥10.877%
🌚10.877%
👌10.877%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SeniorIDE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC813 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

وقتی ی روز خوب بیاد شاید چیزی نَمونه از ما جز خوبیامون...🍻🦋

🍾21❤‍🔥1

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

5 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTCviews —

ᴇᴄʜᴏᴇs ᴏғ ᴍʏ ᴍɪɴᴅ pinned «گاهی مسیر زندگی آن‌قدر تاریک می‌شود که یادمان می‌رود خودمان حامل نور بودیم؛ در تمام آن روزهایی که دست‌تنها با دردهایت جنگیدی و همچنان لبخند زدی، تو قهرمان خاموش دنیای خودت بودی. پس زخم‌هایت را پنهان نکن، چرا که آن‌ها سندِ زنده ماندن و قد کشیدن تو در دل طوفان‌ها…»

5 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC804 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

هیچ چیزی توی دنیا برای یک برنامه نویس جاوا زیبا تر از عبارت BUILD SUCCESSFUL نیست، اونم تو اولین بیلد بدون هیچ اروری🌿

1👌1🥰1

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

5 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC746 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

گاهی مسیر زندگی آن‌قدر تاریک می‌شود که یادمان می‌رود خودمان حامل نور بودیم؛ در تمام آن روزهایی که دست‌تنها با دردهایت جنگیدی و همچنان لبخند زدی، تو قهرمان خاموش دنیای خودت بودی. پس زخم‌هایت را پنهان نکن، چرا که آن‌ها سندِ زنده ماندن و قد کشیدن تو در دل طوفان‌ها هستند. شاید امروز خسته‌ای و بال‌هایت رمقی ندارند، اما نباید یادت برود که آسمان هنوز منتظر پرواز توست و هر اشکی که ریختی، شبنمی بود که روح تو را برای شکفتنی دو

2🔥2

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

4 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC739 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GoodBye👋 📚

🐳51💘1

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

3 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC743 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

4

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

3 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,160 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥21

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

2 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC854 views36 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

𝙃𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙮 𝘽𝙞𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙙𝙖𝙮, 𝘼𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙖! 🎉 𝙔𝙤𝙪’𝙫𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙚 𝙛𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙙 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙣 10 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙄’𝙢 𝙨𝙤 𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙛𝙪𝙡 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙢𝙚𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙮 𝙬𝙚’𝙫𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙙. 𝙄 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙚 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙨 𝙛𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙝𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨, 𝙡𝙤𝙫𝙚, 𝙨𝙪𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙨, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙬𝙞𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧. 𝙈𝙖𝙮 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙛𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙡𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧. 𝙃𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙮 𝘽𝙞𝙧𝙩𝙝𝙙𝙖𝙮, 𝙢𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙛𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙙! 🤍

🍾32👏21🔥1

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

2 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈1,180 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ye_DaneshAmozPhoto

🔴بیلمیرم والا 🤷🏻‍♂ معنی : نمیدونم والا 🎓『 @Ye_Student 』

🤣2

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

28 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC525 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💊3

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

28 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC552 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

یه سری از تلخی های زندگی هم مثل قهوه تلخن ولی بیدارت میکنن✨

👍4🔥1

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

27 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC415 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

05/05/05

🔥4👍1🥰1

Signed ღ aMiRᵈᵉᵛ⟅

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SeniorIDE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴇᴄʜᴏᴇs ᴏғ ᴍʏ ᴍɪɴᴅ” (@SeniorIDE), 525 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeniorIDE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.