3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 449–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 06:19
456
+6
1 Sept 2026, 07:00
450
no change
1 Sept 2026, 06:45
450
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 456 subscribers
Avg views / post
88.5
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
15 (29 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
1,327
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
44
83.0%
🔥
9
17.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
او دیگر دعا نمی کرد اما خداوند خوشحال بود ....
✍️🏻پ.ن: تسلیم ارادهی اراده آفرین شدن مفهومی است پر تکرار در ادبیات ما.
بی شک در میان شاعرانی که با این مضمون شعر گفتن نام مولانا چون شمسی میدرخشه. بنابراین چشیدن ابیات زیر به شدت توصیه میشه...
تدبیر کند بنده و تقدیر نداند
تدبیر به تقدیر خداوند نماند
بنده چو بیندیشد پیداست چه بیند
حیله بکند لیک خدایی نتواند
گامی دو چنان آید کو راست نهادست
وان گاه که داند که کجاهاش ک…
🩺پرکتیس
تشخیص انواع آنمی!😵💫
🔆چطور می تونیم از روی برگه آزمایش بیمار نوع آنمی رو تشخیص بدیم؟در ادامه ۴ تا از مهم ترین انواع آنمی رو بررسی می کنیم.
✅قدم اول اینه که ببینیم اصلا آنمی وجود داره یا نه! پس به Hb نگاه می کنیم. اگه در خانم ها زیر ١٢ و در آقایان زیر 14g/dlباشه به آنمی شک می کنیم.
✅در مرحله بعد به MCV نگاه می کنیم که در واقع معیاری برای اندازه RBC هاست. MCV=80-100fl
🔵اگه MCV از 80 کمتر باشه یعنی آنمی میکرو…
پاسخ✅:
این تصویر مربوط به Peliosis hepatis یک ضایعهٔ عروقی نادر کبدیه که با ایجاد حفرهها یا فضاهای متعددِ پر از خون در پارانشیم کبد مشخص میشه. این فضاها میتونن از نظر اندازه متفاوت باشن و بهصورت منتشر یا کانونی در کبد دیده بشن.
از نظر پاتولوژیک، این فضاها میتونن با اتساع سینوزوئیدها و آسیب پوشش اندوتلیالی سینوزوئیدها همراه باشن. مکانیسم دقیق ایجاد Peliosis کاملاً مشخص نیست.
با چه داروهایی ایجاد میشه؟
این ارتب…
#کیس_کوییز❓✅:
مرد ۳۵ سالهای با درد مبهم در قسمت فوقانی راست شکم مراجعه کرده است. در بررسی تصویربرداری، ضایعات متعدد با اندازههای متفاوت در پارانشیم کبد مشاهده میشود. بیمار سابقه بیماری کبدی شناختهشدهای ندارد.
🥷 هاچینسون اسم مشترک سه ضایعه ای هست که امشب با هم بررسی کردیم؛ پس حالا وقتشه ببینیم خودشون چه کسی هستند؟
سر جاناتان هاچینسون (۱۸۲۸–۱۹۱۳) جراح، آسیبشناس، متخصص پوست و چشمپزشک انگلیسی دورهٔ ویکتوریا بود. او بهخاطر دقت بالینی خارقالعادهاش دهها علامت و بیماری را توصیف کرد که بسیاری هنوز به نام اوست، از جمله در زمینهٔ سیفلیس، سارکوئیدوز و جذام. هاچینسون در کالج سلطنتی جراحان انگلستان رئیس شد و در سال ۱۹۰۸ لقب شوال…
💅 ضایعات ناخن هاچینسون
در زمینهٔ ناخن، علامت هاچینسون به گسترش پیگمانتاسیون قهوهای/سیاه از صفحهٔ ناخن به چین پوستی پروگزیمال ناخن گفته میشه
این علامت بهشدت به نفع ملانوم زیرناخنی است؛
البته گاهی در ضایعات خوشخیم، «علامت هاچینسون کاذب» هم دیده میشه.
#پوست🩹🧴
#اونکولوژی🦀⛔️
الان علاوه بر تصویر بالا، احتمال بیشتری هست که بقیه هاچینسون ساین های پوستی هم تشخیص بدیم
پس درباره مهم ترین همراهی و البته درمانش هم چند تا نکته بدونیم
🤒 بیماری همراه
● هرپس زوستر افتالمیکوس (HZO)
● وجود Hutchinson’s sign یعنی خطر درگیری چشم بهویژه قرنیه، یووه و شبکیه بالاتر است (مانند کراتیت، یووئیت، افزایش فشار چشم)
ولی توجه کنین نبود این علامت، درگیری چشم رو رد نمیکنه
💊 درمان
شروع سریع آنتیویروس سیستمیک طی…
این تصویر رو میشناسی؟😶🌫️
میدونیم بش میگن
Hutchinson's sign = نشانه هاچینسون
پس بریم یکم بیشتر باش آشنا شیم🤝
📸توصیف ضایعه
♤ وزیکولهای گروهی و کوچک روی زمینهٔ قرمز (اریتماتو)
♧ محل: نوک بینی یا پل بینی، معمولاً یکطرفه
◇ ممکن است همزمان با درگیری بینی؛ بثورات پیشانی، پلک یا اطراف چشم هم دیده بشه.
یا اینکه کمی قبل/بعد از ضایعات بینی ظاهر بشن.
🦠 دلیل ایجاد
♤ فعالسازی مجدد ویروس واریسلا زوستر (VZV) در گانگلیون ع…
این هم پاسخ کامل کیسی که پیش از این مطرح شد؛
در پیام های بالاتر در کانال شون میتونین گرافی های مرتبط و مایندمپ این سناریو بالینی هم دنبال کنین
🕊@SeemorghBal
🤔 چرا تشخیص افتراقی های دیگه رد شدند ⁉️
1⃣ گیر کردن جرم گوش
🔹چرا مطرح می شود؟
کاهش ناگهانی شنوایی یکطرفه
احساس گرفتگی گوش
🔹چرا رد می شود؟
جرم در کانال گوش دیده میشود.
با خارج کردن جرم شنوایی برمیگردد.
کاهش شنوایی انتقالی است.
2⃣ اوتیت مدیا حاد یا افیوژن گوش میانی
🔹چرا مطرح می شود؟
بیمار میگوید: «ناگهان گوشم گرفته و خوب نمیشنوم»
احساس پری گوش دارد.
🔹چرا رد می شود؟
کاهش شنوایی انتقالی (Conductive) است، نه حسیعص…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SeemorghBal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بال” (@SeemorghBal), 456 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SeemorghBal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.