Channel
@SecretofSerpent
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001580279455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SecretofSerpent |
| Description | ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ค ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ. @Thexchamberofsecrets |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SecretofSerpent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 19 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 19 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
27 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โคโ๐ฅ | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ๐ฅ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 11.1% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 7.41% | |
| ๐ณ | 2 | 7.41% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2023 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ะะดะต-ัะพ ะฒ ะฝะฐัะธั ะผะตััะฐั ััะฐ ะธััะพัะธั ะทะฐะบะพะฝัะธััั ะธะผะตะฝะฝะพ ัะฐะบโฆ ๐ฅน๐ @SecretofAdrian bye๐ญ๐
โคโ๐ฅ1
Signed ะัะฝัะธ ะฝะต ะฒัะนะดะตั๐
ะัะตัะตะดะฝัะต ัะพะฑััะธั ะฒ ัะบะพะปะต ะผะฐะณะธะธ ะธ ะฒะพะปัะตะฑััะฒะฐ ะฅะพะณะฒะฐััั ะฝะต ะทะฐะบะฐะฝัะธะฒะฐัััั. ะกะตะณะพะดะฝั ะฝะฐ ะฒัะตั ัััะฐะฝะธัะฐั ะตะถะตะดะฝะตะฒะฝะพะณะพ ะฟัะพัะพะบะฐ, ะฒะตัั ะผะฐะณะธัะตัะบะธะน ะผะธั ะพะฑััะถะดะฐะตั ะตัั ะพะดะฝั ัะผะตััั ััะตะฝะธะบะฐ. ะะธัะตะบัะพั ัะบะพะปั-ะกะตะฒะตััั ะกะฝะตะนะฟ ัะพะพะฑัะธะป, ััะพ ะฑัะป ะฝะตััะฐััะฝัะน ัะปััะฐะน, ัััะดะตะฝั ะกะปะธะทะตัะธะฝะฐ ะฟะพ ะฝะตะพััะพัะพะถะฝะพััะธ ะฒ ั ะพะดะต ัะฐะฑะพัั ะฝะฐะด ัะบะพะปัะฝัะผ ะฟัะพะตะบัะพะผ ะฟะพ ััะพะบั ะทะตะปัะตะฒะฐัะตะฝะธะต, ะฒะฝะต ะทะฐะฝััะธะน ะดะพะฟัััะธะป ะพัะธะฑะบะธ. ะกะตะณะพะดะฝั ะฅะพะณะฒะฐััั ัะบะพัะฑะธั ะฟะพ ะขะตะพะดะพัั ะะพััั.
Signed P.P.
ะ ะฅะพะณะฒะฐัััะต ัะฒะพัะธัััั ัััั ะทะฝะฐะตั ััะพ, ะฝะพ ั ะผะตะฝั ะฝะฐัััะพะตะฝะธะต ัะฐะฝัะตะฒะฐัั๐ฉ
โคโ๐ฅ2๐2
Signed P.P.
ะกะฟะฐัะธะฑะพโค๏ธ @secretofPansy
Signed P.P.
Happy B' Day ๐ฅณ @SecretofTheodore
Signed P.P.
ะะตัะฝะธะน ะฒะฐะนะฑ, ะฟะพะปััะฐะตััั? @SecretofPansy
Signed ๐ฆ ๐แดสสแด๐๐ฆ
ะะผะตััะต ั @secretofAdrian
๐ฅ4๐3โคโ๐ฅ2๐1
Signed P.P.
ะะฝะต ะฒะตัะฝะพััะธ ั ัะพะฑะพั ะฑัะดะตั ะผะฐะปะพ
โคโ๐ฅ6
Signed P.P.
๐ค @secretofAdrian
Perfect @secretsofDaphne @secretofAstoria
โคโ๐ฅ2
ะ ะบะฐะบ ะฝะฐัะธะฝะฐะตััั ะฒะฐั ะดะตะฝั?
โคโ๐ฅ2
ะ ะพะดะธัะตะปะตะน ะพัะฟัะฐะฒะธะปะธ ะฝะฐ ััะผะฐัะบั, ะฐ ัะฐะผะธ ะปัะฑัะตะผัั ะณะพัะฐะผะธ ะธ ะทะฐะบะฐัะพะผ. @SecretofPansy
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SecretofSerpent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 609,318 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SecretofSerpent named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโข ๐ท๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ | ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐๐ โขโ (@SecretofSerpent), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SecretofSerpent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.