ะัะพ ะบะฐะบ ะผะพะถะตั ะฒะตััะธััั ๐๐คช
โค2๐2โคโ๐ฅ1๐1

Channel
@Secret_Alliance01
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
321subscribers
+186 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002595345264 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Secret_Alliance01 |
| Created | 10 August 2025 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Secret_Alliance01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:48 | 321 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 327 | +192 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 135 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 135 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 10 August 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (10 August 2025 โ 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,938 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
27 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ๐ฏ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| ๐คฉ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 7.41% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 1 | 3.70% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @Secret_Alliance01. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2025 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ะัะพ ะบะฐะบ ะผะพะถะตั ะฒะตััะธััั ๐๐คช
โค2๐2โคโ๐ฅ1๐1
๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐คฉ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค ะ ะพะทัะณััั ๐ ะพั ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค๐คฉ๐ค๐ค๐ค๐ค ๐คฉPRIZPOOL ๐๐คฉ ๐คฉ3 ะผะตัั ะฟะพ ๐ ๐คฉะฃัะปะพะฒะธั ัะพะทัะณัััะฐ : ๐ะัะพะถะฐัั ะบะฝะพะฟะบั ััะฐััะฒะพะฒะฐัั ๐ะะพะดะฟะธัะบะฐ ะฝะฐ ะบะฐะฝะฐะป ะัะพะณะธ : 21.08.26 ะฒ 19:00 ะผัะบ ะฃัะฟะตะน ะทะฐะปััะฐัั ๐๐๐๐
โค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ โค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธโค๏ธ แด แดแดแดโก๏ธ15.08.26 แดสษขแดษดษชแดขแดแดแดสโก๏ธ@Siskamann ๐คฉ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐คฉ โฃ๏ธ @IPoteka_SA @sarkazm01 @ne_blessed ะะฐั ะฟัะพัะธะผ ะพะฑัะฐัะธัััั ะบ ะพัะณะฐะฝะธะทะฐัะพัั ะฒ ะะก ะดะปั ะฟะพะปััะตะฝะธั ะฟัะธะทะฐ. ๐ค ะัะตะผ ัะฟะฐัะธะฑะพ, ะบัะพ ััะฐััะฒะพะฒะฐะป ัะตะณะพะดะฝั ะฝะฐ ะฝะฐัะธั ะธะณัะฐั . ะะพะทะดัะฐะฒะปัะตะผ ะฟะพะฑะตะดะธัะตะปะตะน.โค๏ธโ๐ฅ
โค2
๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ ๐คฉ๐คฉ ๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ๐คฉ ๐คฉ๐คฉ ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ท๐ป.๐ถ๐พ.๐ธ๐ถ๐ธ๐ผ ๐๐๐ โ @Siskamann ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ :๐๐๐๐ โฃ๏ธ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐ฝ:๐ป๐ถ / ๐ท๐พ:๐ถ๐ถ โฃ๏ธ๐ณ๐๐๐๐ ๐ท๐พ:๐ธ๐ป / ๐ท๐พ:๐น๐ป โฃ๏ธ๐ฝ๐๐ ๐ท๐ฟ:๐ถ๐ถ / ๐ท๐ฟ:๐ท๐ถ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐น๐ธ๐ป ๐คฉ ๐ป๐ถ๐ท - ๐ท โก๏ธโก๏ธโก๏ธ ๐ ๐ธ๐บ๐ฟ๐ด๐๐ธ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐บ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฒ๐๐๐๐ข ๐ณ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ข๐
โค5๐ฏ1๐คฉ1
ะะพะฑัะพะต ะฒัะตะผะตะฝะธ ัััะพะบ, ะฒะฐั ะฟัะธะฒะตัััะฒัะตั ะบะปะฐะฝ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ะ ัะตััั ะพัะบัััะธั ะฝะฐัะตะณะพ ะบะปะฐะฝะฐ ะผั ั ะพัะธะผ ะฟัะพะฒะตััะธ ะบะฐััะพะผะฝัะต ะธะณัั. ะัะพะฒะตะดะตะฝะธะต ะธะณั ะฑัะดะตั 15.08. ะะฝัะพัะผะฐัะธั ะฟัะพ ะฒัะตะผั, ะบะฐััั ะธ ะฒัะต ะพััะฐะปัะฝัะต ัะฒะตะดะตะฝะธั ะฑัะดัั ะฒัะปะพะถะตะฝั.
โค1
ะฃะฒะฐะถะฐะตะผัะต ะดะฐะผั, ะฐ ัะฐะบ ะถะต ะณะพัะฟะพะดะฐ. ะะฑััะฒะปัะตััั ะฝะฐะฑะพั ััะฐััะฝะธะบะพะฒ ะฒ ะบะปะฐะฝ 10 ััะพะฒะฝั ะฟะพะด ะฝะฐะทะฒะฐะฝะธะตะผ ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฅฐะัะธัะตัะธะธ ะดะปั ะฒัััะฟะปะตะฝะธั๐ฅฐ โ ะะพะทัะฐัั 18+ โ ะะด 5 ะฝะฐ 50 ะผะฐััะตะน (ะผะถ.) โ ะะด 4 ะฝะฐ 50 ะผะฐััะตะน (ะถะฝ.) โ ะกะผะตะฝะฐ ะฝะธะบะฐ ัะตัะตะฝะธะต 5 ะดะฝะตะน (ะฟัะธะผะตั:SiskamanใSA) โ ะััั ะฐะบัะธะฒะฝัะผ ะฒ ัะฐัะต/ะธะณัะต โ ะะฑัะทะฐัะตะปัะฝะพะต ััะฐััะธะต ะฝะฐ ะผะตัะพะฟัะธััะธัั ๐ถะงะขะ ะะซ ะะะะฃะงะะขะ ะะข ะะะก๐ถ โ ะััะถะฝัะน ะบะพะปะปะตะบัะธะฒ โ ะัะทัะฒัะธะฒะฐั ะฐะดะผะธะฝะธัััะฐัะธั โ ะัะตะบัะฐัะฝะพะต ะฝะฐััโฆ
โค5๐ฏ3๐คฉ3
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Secret_Alliance01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank โ 690,796 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐บ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐จ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โ (@Secret_Alliance01), 321 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Secret_Alliance01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.