Channel
@SdianYing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
154subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001961857429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SdianYing |
| Description | ✅商务洽谈： @TGMAX123 ✅商务频道： https://t.me/youxibaling ✅增粉平台: https://maxpanel.cc ✅TG会员代开: https://t.me/TelePremium123Bot ✅苹果ID|协议号: https://t.me/XPanelShop 👉投放广告: https://tgads.org/m/SdianYing |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SdianYing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 154 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 154 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 September 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢食事史馆|品美食 尝历史 📢2026世界杯 世界杯赛... 📢PA代理 PA官网 PA... 📢南宫问鼎壹号非凡征途官方... 📢聚客娱乐交流群 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 皇冠... 📢苏州SPA｜苏州半套｜苏... 📢【旺博飞投】真人视讯百家... 📢港澳六合彩-彩票资料-导... 📢杭州.包养.包月.外围.... 📢❰AG亚游❱官方直营_亚... 📢刀枪剑戟|冷兵器|分享 📢欧博代理 欧博官网 欧博... 📢小玉 📢露出-户外 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢专业Telegram账号交易平台🔥热门社交媒体账号交易 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 📢 飞驰号铺 [主营：飞机号 开会员 代充星星] 📢 X-panel 一站式拉人增粉平台 📢⚽️爱博体育-佣金55%-玩家首存即升VIP7等级⚽️ 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管…
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢外围足球 世界杯足球 世... 📢成都一条龙服务 📢百家乐博彩平台电竞 📢丝足-足交-足控🔞 📢女星驿站 📢鸿腾集团-百家乐-棋牌-... 📢李肅Hi5第一頻道 📢纪实说|圆桌派|马末都 📢反差婊/母狗/投稿曝光台 📢人情世故|江湖翻译|听言... 📢奥运会金牌-奥运会投注-... 📢腿部恋物癖画廊 📢【清风数据】全行业一手D... 📢经典电影|老电影|怀旧 📢Bubble Chann... 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢🅾️免费试玩✅大客必备✅注册送158🅾️ 🥇西湖娱乐城✅老品牌包出款✅出款超10亿U 📢182体育 2026世界杯指定投注平台、 免实名、不限ip、u存u提无上限 📢球速体育相信品牌的力量、老品牌值得信赖、不限ip、免实名。 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 🇨🇳 简体中文包 —————————-- 🔥将 @TonGroupHelpBot 设置为频道管理员，即可在200
越哥说电影🎥 pinned a photo
✅海外粉秒上，质量最稳，售后最快✅ 🚀强拉活粉无需长时间等待🚀 🔥直登协议号🔥苹果id批发价🔥 #广告
❤1
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
417. 【越哥】堪称一绝的黑色电影，看了这部片子的结局，我才知道什么叫编剧！
416. 【越哥】2017年华语最佳影片，首映5000人全体起立，可惜排片太少了！
415. 【越哥】上映首日刷新记录，很多人哭着走出影院，人生必看的动画电影之一！
414. 【越哥】房价是如何一步步跌下来的？真实事件改编的传记电影
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SdianYing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 524,452 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SdianYing named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“越哥说电影🎥” (@SdianYing), 154 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SdianYing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.