Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

медиаразнорабочий

@ScvorikovaMedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

169subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116991363
TypeChannel
Username@ScvorikovaMedia
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ScvorikovaMedia

Growth

1699 Aug 2026, 14:47 — 169 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:51 — 169 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:4710 Aug 2026, 05:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:51169no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:47169first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.4%
avg views ÷ 169 subscribers
Avg views / post
197
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held12 (11 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total787
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

360 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15242.2%
❤‍🔥4311.9%
👍4111.4%
🔥287.78%
💔277.50%
😍164.44%
🥰154.17%
😁113.06%
👏82.22%
💘51.39%
🤯51.39%
🤪41.11%
🤝20.556%
🐳10.278%
😘10.278%
🦄10.278%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC143 views42 reactionsread 9 August 2026

хочу похвастаться ДВФУ занял 7 место в рейтинге интернет репутации вузов. Причем акцент хвальбы сделан на активном обсуждении Приемной комиссии пользователями Показатель отражает не абсолютное количество обсуждений, а их долю в общем пользовательском инфопотоке о вузе. Поэтому высокий результат говорит о том, что университет воспринимается прежде всего как объект выбора будущими студентами, а не только как участник

20👍9🥰7🤪4👏2

28 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC201 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Один из моих самых любимых дней во всей приемке — день подсчета промежуточных результатов. Собираю красивые цифры по поданным заявлениям на бак/спец/бво 💅 И сейчас каааак отправим в СМИ 💅 Считаю все % на калькуляторе через пропорцию, как в школе учили, потому что я гуманитарий

16🔥5👍1

23 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC278 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Целую неделю вела прямые эфиры для абитуриентов. Ссылки давать не буду, кружка нет, верьте на слово Мама говорит, что нужно было учиться на Журналистике, но считаю, и так справляюсь Честно, очень утомительно проводить эфиры после рабочего дня, в пятницу уже не было сил улыбаться. Но поняла одно — страшно было на первом эфире. А еще, что хороший ведущий — не тот, кто просто зачитывает вопрос. А это значит, что и го

13💔8👏6🔥5

4 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC415 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Экологично справляемся с шестидневной рабочей неделей в Драйв парке

11👍6

3 Jul 2026, 02:29 UTC354 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Когда прошу СВОЮ ЛУЧШУЮ ПОДРУЖКУ свести данные из разных табличек в одну, чтобы сделать приглашения к поступлению

❤‍🔥13😁11👍6

2 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC740 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Мы снова здесь. Снова с Дашей снимаем эфиры для абитуриентов В этом году говорим не столько про направления, сколько про вектор развития каждого института, какую роль мы как университет играем в регионе и стране Уже не знаю, какой у меня по счету это эфир, но теперь проводить их стало чуть спокойнее 🤞🏼

12❤‍🔥6👍6🔥2💘1

16 Jun 2026, 11:12 UTC353 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

До начала приема 3 дня Сидим с Дашей, пытаемся доделать гадости, которые откладывали на последний момент. Сейчас мы: - загружаем базу контактов в срм, которые были пойманы еще до ее внедрения (отложила на завтра, знаете, все еще не хочу это делать) - планируем стирку мерча - делаем кучу разных презентаций про одно и то же, но для разных ЦА (сказал бы мне кто в школе, что я буду ненавидеть презентации, не поверила бы

15👍7❤‍🔥6💘1😘1

4 May 2026, 05:48 UTC522 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В этом году мне в нагрузку вписали руководство практикой у 1 курса. Коммуникация идет тяжело, я удивлена и даже не знаю почему и что делать. Особенно, потому что решили отправлять всех их в город на практику Приколы: - отправила выверенный ворд договора. На той стороне его отредактировали, повписывали неправильные цифры, подписали и вернули обратно со словами «я ничего не меняла». К слову, я проверила свое письмо, в

💔198🤯5🤝2

29 Apr 2026, 13:44 UTC487 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dbrsvvvvvVideo

И снова приближается май, и снова мы все вместе готовимся к приемке❤️❤️

🔥83❤‍🔥1💘1

24 Apr 2026, 05:11 UTC538 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне напомнили, что я не рассказала про сувенирку на ДОД 🌚 исправляюсь. делаю мало-мальски полезный контент Началось всё с разговора: — Виктория, мы фир стиль обновляем в этом году? — Не. Давайте только сувенирку в один стиль приведем, что еще не доделали — Ок Эта «оставшаяся» сувенирка: 💙ремувки 💙футболки для волонтеров 💙бутылочки 💙флешки 💙наклейки из смолы (на телефон) 💙открытки 12 шт По моим ощущениям в этом год

17👍5❤‍🔥4🥰2

11 Apr 2026, 05:22 UTC491 views63 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

моя пятая поездка в Японию и первая как туриста ❤️однофамилец думал, что я везде была, что он едет с гидом и будет кайфовать (ха-ха)

29😍16❤‍🔥13🥰2🐳1👍1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ScvorikovaMedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 717,766 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“медиаразнорабочий” (@ScvorikovaMedia), 169 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScvorikovaMedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.