Channel
@ScienceAndCuriosit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
146subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001630909885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ScienceAndCuriosit |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 3 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ScienceAndCuriosit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 146 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 146 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
13 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 76.9% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 7.69% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2022 to 1 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Saludos, caballeros y damas. Este proyecto ha sido abandonado porque el programador con quien estaba trabajando decidió no darle más soporte a la API para que siga funcionando junto al canal, de todas formas algún día volveré.
👍5⚡1❤1👏1
义Ciencia y Curiosidades义 pinned Deleted message
义Ciencia y Curiosidades义 pinned Deleted message
Poliarca 1. m. En la Grecia antigua, miembro de un Gobierno formado por varias personas de idéntico rango. ⇢ Telegram | ☇ @ScienceAndCuriosit 🪙
La corteza terrestre está 'goteando' hacia las profundidades del manto justo debajo de los Andes — Un equipo de investigadores liderado por geólogos de la Universidad de Toronto , en Canadá, acaba de descubrir que, del mismo modo en que la miel gotea lentamente de una cuchara , algunas partes de la capa rocosa más externa de la corteza terrestre, justo bajo los Andes, están 'goteando' hacia las profundidades del man…
👍3
义Ciencia y Curiosidades义 pinned Deleted message
Hola a todos. Este mensaje es para decirles que si al darle al botón de Seguir Leyendo el bot no les envía ningún mensaje deben hacer lo siguiente: 1. @Alopecio_Bot « Darle ahí. 2. Darle donde dice START Después de hacer esto le dan de nuevo a Seguir Leyendo y el bot ya debería enviarles la noticia completa. Si no lo hace contactar a @T_S_L_A
义Ciencia y Curiosidades义 pinned Deleted message
义Ciencia y Curiosidades义 pinned Deleted message
Laparoscopia 1. f. Med. Exploración visual de la cavidad abdominal con el laparoscopio. 2. f. Med. Técnica de la laparoscopia. ⇢ Telegram | ☇ @ScienceAndCuriosit 🪙
Resuelto el misterio de la última Edad de Hielo — Un nuevo estudio dirigido por investigadores de la Universidad de Arizona ha conseguido resolver dos misterios que han desconcertado durante mucho tiempo a los expertos que estudian el clima pasado de la Tierra: ¿De dónde vino todo el hielo que, hace unos 100.000 años, cubrió casi por completo el hemisferio norte durante la última glaciación? ¿Y cómo pudieron esas ca…
La ucraniana Maryna Viazovska, medalla Fields por su forma de 'empaquetar naranjas' — La ucraniana Maryna Viazovska ha ganado junto a otros tres matemáticos la Medalla Fields 2022, un prestigioso premio en el campo de las matemáticas que se otorga a talentos menores de 40 años por sus «hallazgos excepcionales». Los otros ganadores son el matemático británico James Maynard, el estadounidense June Huh y el francés Hug…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ScienceAndCuriosit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 987,748 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ScienceAndCuriosit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“义Ciencia y Curiosidades义” (@ScienceAndCuriosit), 146 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScienceAndCuriosit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.