Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Исследуйте Писания

Channel

Исследуйте Писания

@Schrift38

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001754035185
TypeChannel
Username@Schrift38
DescriptionИсследуйте Писания, ибо вы думаете чрез них иметь жизнь вечную; а они свидетельствуют о Мне (Ин. 5: 39). Канал ведёт катехизатор Михаило-Архангельского Харлампиевского храма г. Иркутска Саламатов Михаил Александрович https://t.me/salamatov38
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Schrift38

Growth

2232252247 Aug 2026, 17:12 — 225 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 223 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:31 — 223 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:128 Aug 2026, 10:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–225 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:31223no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:31223-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:12225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 223 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.5
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held20 (30 April 202628 July 2026)
Views total150
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
538
Videos
22
Links
1,060

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3555.6%
🙏1523.8%
👍1219.0%
🤝11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC42 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

На все Богородичные праздники мы слышим один и тот же Евангельский текст (Лк.10:38–42,11:27–28). Иисус приходит в некое селение, и женщина именем Марфа принимает Его в свой дом. Что делать хозяйке, принимающей гостя в своем доме? Естественно, накормить его. Накорми, напои, а потом уже и спрашивай. Это же так очевидно. И когда хозяйка готовит угощение, её сестра сидит у ног Иисуса и слушает Его. И тогда Марфа просит

4👍1

21 Jul 2026, 00:29 UTC37 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

🎤 Беседа на Иркутском радио с Варварой Преображенской: Печаль и уныние: причины и природа печали и уныния. В чём разница между печалью и унынием? Что делать, если печалишься или унываешь? Архангельский глас: Уныние, которое часто называют депрессией #Михаил_Саламатов #Архангельский_глас

17 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

🎤 Записали с Варварой Преображенской на Иркутском радио подкаст о святых благоверных князе Петре и княгине Февронии, Муромских чудотворцах. Архангельский глас: Житие святых благоверных князя Петра и княгини Февронии #Михаил_Саламатов #Архангельский_глас

8 Jul 2026, 03:01 UTC53 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

🎤 Две беседы на Иркутском радио с Варварой Преображенской о священномученике Ефреме, епископе Селенгинском. Надеюсь, что Вы получите пользу от прослушивания записей данных бесед: 1️⃣Архангельский глас: Житие священномученика Ефрема, епископа Селенгинского 2️⃣Архангельский глас: Житие священномученика Ефрема, епископа Селенгинского. Продолжение #Михаил_Саламатов #Архангельский_глас

2

20 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC65 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

Может ли человек быть опорой самому себе? ЧАСТЬ ВТОРАЯ. 5. У пророка и царя Давида в 117 псалме есть такие слова: «Лучше уповать на Господа, нежели надеяться на человека. Лучше уповать на Господа, нежели надеяться на князей» (Пс.117:8-9). То, на что мы уповаем, на что надеемся, является тем, чему мы определяем быть основанием, опорой нашего бытия. Ибо человек, являясь свободным существом, может определять: что буде

🙏51

20 Jun 2026, 10:00 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

Может ли человек быть опорой самому себе? ЧАСТЬ ПЕРВАЯ. Современные люди, пораженные гуманистическим мировоззрением, считают, что они могут быть опорой сами себе. Давайте посмотрим с православной точки зрения: может ли человек быть опорой самому себе? 1. Вначале коснемся не собственно человеческого бытия, а тварного бытия как такового, тварного бытия вообще. С православной точки зрения любое тварное бытие не являе

👍3🙏21

19 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC35 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

Главная проблема человеческого бытия глубже политических проблем. Политические проблемы вторичны по отношению к проблемам человеческого существования. Главная проблема нашей жизни скрывается не в политической организации общества, а в нас самих. Главная проблема для каждого человека — это он сам. Доминантное сосредоточение на политических проблемах делает нас слепыми к фундаментальным проблемам своего бытия, так как

3👍2

19 Jun 2026, 09:38 UTC43 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

Если мир необратимо абсурден, тогда возникает вопрос: каким образом в необратимо абсурдном мире появляется и существует человек, не способный быть без бунта против абсурда, не способный жить без смысла? Как может бунтовать против абсурда тот, кто не имеет смысловых оснований бытия? Разве может абсурд бунтовать против абсурда? Для того, кто не способен видеть света, не может быть тьмы. Абсурдный человек не способен о

4

16 Jun 2026, 10:40 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

🎤 Две беседы на Иркутском радио с Варварой Преображенской о нашем земляке, святителе Герасиме Добросердове. Очень интересная и поучительная жизнь. Буду рад, если Вы получите пользу от прослушивания записи данных бесед. 1️⃣ Архангельский глас: Святитель Герасим (Добросердов) 2️⃣ Архангельский глас: Беседа о святителе Герасиме (Добросердове) #Михаил_Саламатов #Архангельский_глас

3 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salamatov38

🎤 Записали с Варварой Преображенской подкаст, посвящённый событию Пятидесятницы. Старались говорить о значении события Пятидесятницы в нашем с Вами бытии. Буду рад, если Вы получите пользу от прослушивания данной записи. https://иркутскинформ.рф/podcasts/arhangelskij-glas-voznesenie-i-troica26/ #Михаил_Саламатов

🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Schrift38. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Исследуйте Писания” (@Schrift38), 223 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Schrift38.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.