Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

• 𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐱 || 𝑶𝒊

@Scarletx_oi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003509848516
TypeChannel
Username@Scarletx_oi
Description𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐱 ( Скарлетикс ) — Новая женская ои группа под прототипом Айдл где у каждой участницы свой голос и каждая тут индивидуальна.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 14 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Scarletx_oi

Growth

127 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:3012no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1112first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Videos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
2m 49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

110 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2018.2%
❤‍🔥1210.9%
🔥1110.0%
🎉109.09%
🦄109.09%
🐳98.18%
💘87.27%
🤯65.45%
🕊54.55%
32.73%
🏆32.73%
💋32.73%
🥰32.73%
🍓21.82%
💅21.82%
🆒10.909%
😍10.909%
🤩10.909%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 09:52 UTC220 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.🎀🔇> 🔠UDITION🎀🎁🪽🪽 ★ SCARLETX🎁 - the best group "➿ 🎀 ➿ 🎀 ➿ 🎀 ➿"🎀🎀 🌼𝐖ritε :: @MKentint_bot --- ' Free ` 🎁 ¡ I-DLE !?💎. " . Shunua || busy:: от4 пթɑׁׅϐυׁׅлɑׁׅ , ɑׁׅнkꫀтɑׁׅ .in cꪮꭷмм..ʾ 🎀🎀"➿ 🎀 ➿ 🎀 ➿ 🎀 ➿"

🤯32❤‍🔥1🍓1🎉1🐳1🔥1🦄1

9 Jun 2026, 07:52 UTC65 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Anon time with SCARLETX! Rules: •You can't swear or hate the participants❗️ •18+ prohibited❗️ Shumi- Rina- Lipli-❌ Mingi- ?-❌

2💋2💘21❤‍🔥1🐳1🤯1🥰1

9 Jun 2026, 06:39 UTC34 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mk_entertainentPhoto

Всем привет,с вами M'k Entertainment и это наш краш лист,если увидели себя обязательно репостните к себе в канал,подпишитесь и поставьте рк если не сложно 🙏 °•Solo•° @Modisoloo @Yf_enter @lesya_oi @LunaSoloArtistkaoi @akihikosolo @haromisolo @YunonieSolo @yushitoi @park_naomi_solo @LAISA_OI @Solo_Nirris @Porndeprict @sian_solo @JIYEONG_SOL °•Companies•° @love_ent1 @vision_label_oi @wowentertainmentoff @mk_entertainen

9 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC60 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

💛Хотите анон тайм вместе с Scarletx?💜

  1. Нет🌟0%
  2. Наша кнопка(если нажмёте автоматом засчитывается как да)🌸31%

Shares as published, totalling 31%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4🐳2🏆1💘1🕊1🥰1🦄1

7 Jun 2026, 07:58 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

{🐩} :: Спасибо за ваш актив❤️

1❤‍🔥1🎉1💋1

7 Jun 2026, 07:43 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

{🦢} – Спасибо за такое колл-во реакций!!🌷

1❤‍🔥1🎉1

7 Jun 2026, 05:24 UTC95 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Кто вам уже понравился и кого вы уже биасите?👀

  1. Шуми54%
  2. Рина38%
  3. Минги13%
  4. Хена8%
  5. Липли13%
  6. От 546%
  7. Наша кнопка21%

The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥2❤‍🔥1🎉1🐳1💘1🕊1🦄1

6 Jun 2026, 13:45 UTC162 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.🎀🎀爱|| SCARLETX DEBUT\\🎁 "➿🎀🎀 ➿🎀🎀 ➿🎀🎀 ➿" 🤩 #trueidle #thebestgroup #➿➿”La la la la la da 'Cause love is louder in Mono„➿➿# ❤️Лучшая группа, с самой запоминающейся дебютной песней. Потому что мы TRUE I-DLE 🎀🎀🎀🎀Are you ready?🎀😈 🎀🎀🎀lipli / shumi / rina / mingi / hena? "➿🎀🎀 ➿🎀🎀 ➿🎀🎀 ➿"

5🔥4❤‍🔥3🐳2🤯2🦄2🎉1🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Scarletx_oi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

💛Хотите анон тайм вместе с Scarletx?💜

  1. Нет🌟0%
  2. Наша кнопка(если нажмёте автоматом засчитывается как да)🌸31%

Shares as published, totalling 31%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Jun 2026, 05:24 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Кто вам уже понравился и кого вы уже биасите?👀

  1. Шуми54%
  2. Рина38%
  3. Минги13%
  4. Хена8%
  5. Липли13%
  6. От 546%
  7. Наша кнопка21%

The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,460,234 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

ᴋɪᴍ¿ᴀᴋɪʜɪᴋᴏ🍯
@akihikosolo · 55
1 post
୨ 💜 . @ 𝗖𝗥𝗔𝗭𝗬 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥 . . . 🎆
@CrazyCover · 34
1 post
𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗞𝗦 𝗢𝗜
@darksoi1 · 29
1 post
𐙚_𝔈𝘟𝘐𝘛 ᨦᨦ 100% #cvg(!!)う
@exitcov · 16
1 post
ᕼᗣᖇᗝᗰᖗ 🤎
@haromisolo · 182
1 post
🍥𐔌 ۪𓈒ֵ۫ 𓈒࡙𝓗 𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖 𝓔𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡⊹ ࣪ ˖🍰
@Himati_iska · 66
1 post
🤍 # Jew - No //🕳️
@jewelschipsiki · 68
1 post
• 𝑳𝑨𝑰𝑺𝑨 ❄️
@LAISA_OI · 78
1 post
𖧧.៹𝙻𝚎𝚜𝚢𝚊~ᵇᵉˢᵗՏOᒪO☘️
@lesya_oi · 66
1 post
ℒ𐌏VE E𐌽T | 101% ᥣ᧐᥎ᥱ💕
@love_ent1 · 33
1 post
愛| Luchia
@luchia_cvr · 27
1 post
Рест|𝓜𝓸𝓭𝓲 * 🐼
@Modisoloo · 19
1 post
Монно // ⛱️
@Monno_journalist · 32
1 post
Nauzer || Oi 🏵
@NAUZER_Oi · 13
1 post
~ 实验ִ ་ 💛 N𝙚૦̝ⲛ𝗇 ᰍ * >
@NeonnGG · 43
1 post
ПЕРЕЕЗД @naomioiartist
@park_naomi_solo · 61
1 post
[AUD] ੈ˚₊թ:ረαƴ•₊˚
@playcoverr · 31
1 post
RAVYX
@ravyxoi · 18
1 post
@ . ִׄ 𝐒𝗶ꭤ𝗻 ꯱𑄜᧒𝕠υׁׅꭈׁׅ ׅ[🌷] ⌗ᥣׁׅ֪ꭷ𝐯𝐞
@sian_solo · 146
1 post
‹ 𝗦ⲙ𝘂t𝗵iꫀׁׅܻ݊ :: 𝗝ꪮ𝘂r𝗻ɑׁׅ𝗹is𝘁
@smuthie_oi · 79
1 post
Ушла 𝗡𝗶𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘀 ˢᵒᶫᵒ
@Solo_Nirris · 236
1 post
𝙑𝙄𝘾𝙏𝙊𝙍𝙔 𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐄𝐋 :; 𝙊𝙄 🩷
@victory_label · 296
1 post
#𝑽ꪱꪀs⃨ꪋ𝒓t ⚘𝆕૮𝒖ẗꪱꫀ𝒔 ) )
@vinsart_cvr_oi · 25
1 post
Ⲩυⲋⲏⲓⲧⲁυ ⲋⲟⳑⲟ 🧡🤍🖤
@yushitoi · 32
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“• 𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐱 || 𝑶𝒊” (@Scarletx_oi), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Scarletx_oi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.