Channel
@Scanify_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003180617166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Scanify_ru |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Scanify_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 155 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 156 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 156 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 20 | 34.5% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 32.8% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 27.6% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 5.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На днях наш коллега скинул новинку по одному из отчетов БКИ. Уже ждали это обновление для добавления в отчет Scanify. По своим клиентам пока такого не видели. Благодарим вас за бдительность 🔥 Если вдруг вы заметили что-то необычное в отчетах - присылайте, разберемся вместе👍
❤3
Благодарим Кирилла за видеоотзыв о нашем сервисе Scanify! 🔥
🔥3
Отзыв тестировщика Scanify КИ🔥 Мы все время тестируем наш сервис и проводим доработки по замечаниям и предложениям тестировщиков. Благодарим за участие и помощь в развитии, за бдительность🤗 😉БКИ довольно часто что-то меняют в своих отчетах форматы разделов, расположение строк и т.д. И это не всегда заметно глазу. Некоторые вещи благодаря автоматизированному анализу мы действительно стали понимать глубже💯 В следу…
❤6
Благодарю Михаила за видеоотзыв о сервисе Scanify КИ🔥 Это сервис, который был создан с заботой о вашем удобстве; с целью экономии вашего времени👍 По вопросам и сотрудничеству вы можете обратиться: @shirokovkredit
👍3❤1🙏1
Кредитные организации начали править после заявлений в БКИ аномальные сроки одобрений до 9999 года!🎉 До этого приходилось писать обращения в ЦБ. По первому клиенту пришел сразу положительный ответ из БКИ!
🔥8❤3👍3
Благодарю команду компании «Банкрот-Сервис» и его руководителя Михайлова Антона за честный отзыв о сервисе Scanify БФЛ🔥 Для нас это очень ценно и важно!☝️ Рады быть полезными для вас! 😀
👍5❤3🔥3
🔎 Важное изменение в формировании кредитных историй, которое вступает в силу с сегодняшнего дня. 📌 Больше прозрачности при переуступке долгов Раньше в кредитной истории фиксировался только факт передачи долга новому кредитору. Если новый банк отправлял данные в другое бюро, отследить первоначального кредитора было практически невозможно. Теперь в кредитной истории будет указываться, какой именно банк или организац…
👍5
Каждый день все больше экспертов знакомятся с возможностями сервиса Scanify и остаются довольны скоростью и удобством Благодарим вас за отзывы 🫶 Каждый день специалистами из нашей команды ведется работа, которая не видна глазу. Но она очень ценна и ведет к постоянным улучшениям👍 По всем вопросам и предложениям вы можете обратиться в нашу поддержку: [email protected]
🔥4
🔥Scanify БФЛ: https://bfl.scanify-bot.ru/web Первый комплект для отправки заявления в АС - бесплатно
❤3🔥2🙏2
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Scanify_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 418,473 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scanify” (@Scanify_ru), 155 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Scanify_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.