Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ScamSniffer

Channel

ScamSniffer

@ScamSnifferAlert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

685subscribers

+51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002440865575
TypeChannel
Username@ScamSnifferAlert
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ScamSnifferAlert

Growth

634685659.57 August 2026 — 634 subscribers8 August 2026 — 634 subscribers15 August 2026 — 682 subscribers22 August 2026 — 685 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 626–693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 11:34685+3
15 Aug 2026, 14:43682+48
8 Aug 2026, 02:50634no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:03634first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
925.0%
👍513.9%
👏513.9%
😱38.33%
🫡38.33%
👾25.56%
🙏25.56%
🐳12.78%
🔥12.78%
😈12.78%
🤓12.78%
🤡12.78%
🤨12.78%
🤯12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 17 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Mar 2026, 00:05 UTC≈2,570 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost ~$1.77M USDC after signing a phishing permit (gasless approval) signature on Ethereum. 🎣⚠️ https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2033695871448326478

😱31

17 Feb 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Address poisoning / look‑alike recipient strikes again. ~2 hrs ago on Ethereum, 0xce31…b89b sent ~$599,714 to the wrong near‑match address. ⚠️ ✅ Intended: 0x77f6ca8E…a346 ❌ Wrong: 0x77f6A6F6…A346 https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2023696439688515772

4 Feb 2026, 11:37 UTC≈2,840 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💸 Copying the wrong "familiar" address can cost six figures. On Ethereum, 0x2dfc…a14c sent 3.5 WBTC (~$266k) to a look‑alike address (0x85cBe4af…D8f6) instead of a Binance deposit (0x85cbb0E8…D8f6). ⚠️ https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2019012254319136815

31 Jan 2026, 02:21 UTC≈2,590 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨💔 10 hours ago, another victim lost 4,556 ETH ($12.25M) by copying the wrong address from a contaminated transfer history. ⚠️ Never copy the address from transfer histories. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2017422623085629583

20 Jan 2026, 04:35 UTC≈2,410 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $3.02M worth of SLVon and XAUt after signing multiple phishing signatures. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2013469877315764271

👍2🤓1🙏1

3 Jan 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,390 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $1.08M worth of $aEthLBTC after signing a malicious "permit" signature. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2007429004006174888

1😈1

16 Dec 2025, 02:55 UTC≈2,500 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $563,590 worth of $aEthUSDT after signing a malicious "permit" signature. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/2000747733108592846

👍2🙏1

8 Dec 2025, 13:34 UTC≈2,250 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $440,358 in $USDC after signing a malicious "permit" signature. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/1998018496635207832

👏1🤡1🤯1

5 Dec 2025, 02:24 UTC≈2,130 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $258,216 in $USDC and $XAUt after signing multiple malicious "permit" signatures. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/1996765230614171690

🔥1

26 Nov 2025, 01:40 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $233,913 in $aEthWBTC after signing a malicious "permit" signature. https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/1993494779351777415

25 Nov 2025, 14:25 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $182,951 worth of $USDT after signing a phishing "approve" transaction. 💸 https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/1993325015329390938

24 Nov 2025, 14:57 UTC≈1,780 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Someone lost $838K worth of PT-LP tUSDe after signing a phishing "approve" transaction. 💸 https://x.com/realScamSniffer/status/1992970532942483555

👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ScamSnifferAlert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ScamSniffer” (@ScamSnifferAlert), 685 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScamSnifferAlert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.