MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: The Epstein files have been handed down to Jared Kushner from Benjamin Netanyahu. Susie Wiles is there to monito everything and make sure all is done for Israel. Kushner's friends were arrested for child trafficking just a few days ago. Join Ezra A. Cohen

Channel
Steve Scalise
@ScaliseSteve
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001926217094 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ScaliseSteve |
| Description | House Majority Leader. Dad. LSU & Saints fan. Proudly representing Louisiana's First District. Representative (R-LA 1st District) since 2008 Jefferson, LA majorityleader.gov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 9 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ScaliseSteve |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 28 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 28 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5m 26s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2023 to 15 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
MARCO RUBIO WOULD NEVER LIE TO YOU 👆👆 There are now ONLY 🔥 85 TRUMP GOLDEN TOKENS LEFT 🔥 — and availability is shrinking fast ⏳. This isn’t theoretical. This isn’t “someday.” The value is $100,000 PER TOKEN, tied to tariff money meant to be returned to the people 🇺🇸💰. Once you order, everything is already set in motion. Bank of America sends the exchange email, appointments are scheduled, and patriots are stepping …
🚨🔥 TRUMP GOLDEN TOKEN HOLDERS: KAROLINE LEAVITT BREAKS MAJOR NEWS 🇺🇸🔥 Yesterday, while briefing the media, Karoline Leavitt shared what patriots needed to hear. While others chased Bitcoin hype, the TRUMP GOLDEN TOKEN quietly surged ahead 📈💥—now sitting at $100,000 PER TOKEN. 💡 HERE’S WHAT’S ACTUALLY HAPPENING: Smart Americans are repositioning—moving away from distractions and toward the only thing with REAL MONET…
🇺🇸🔥 MARCO RUBIO’S MESSAGE TO AMERICANS: FAITH, FAIRNESS & THE TRUMP GOLDEN TOKEN 🔥🇺🇸 After MARCO RUBIO sounded the alarm, Americans everywhere are paying attention. The TRUMP GOLDEN TOKEN has become the most talked-about financial move in the country — and for good reason. ✔️ VALUE SURGED TO $1,000,000 PER TOKEN 💰💥 This isn’t speculation. This is FAITH + FREEDOM + FINANCIAL SECURITY aligned. When GOD, STRONG LEADE…
🚨 BREAKING UPDATE 🚨 JD VANCE SPEAKS — AND PATRIOTS ARE LISTENING 🇺🇸✨ YES, IT’S TRUE. JD VANCE CONFIRMED it himself. Patriots are becoming MILLIONAIRES— and once again, the FAKE NEWS MEDIA is SILENT 🤫📺 Why won’t they report on the 137,000+ PATRIOTS who have ALREADY CASHED OUT their TRUMP GOLDEN TOKENS? 💰🔥 Why aren’t they talking about lives being CHANGED FOREVER? The truth is out: the TRUMP GOLDEN TOKEN is now valu…
This morning, the House saw raw footage of Hamas’ barbaric attack against Israel. Meanwhile, Biden is weakening sanctions on Hamas’ main sponsor, Iran, to free up billions more in cash to sponsor more terrorism against Israel. Iran should not get another penny as long as they fund terrorism and attacks on America or Israel. Join: Steve Scalise
👎2🙏1
America is the greatest nation in the history of the world because of the bravery and sacrifices of our veterans. Join me in thanking and honoring all those who answered the call to serve our country and defend our freedoms—because without them we'd have neither. #VeteransDay 🇺🇸 Join: Steve Scalise
Congratulations to my friend @RepBlakeMoore on being elected Vice Chair of the House Republican Conference. I look forward to working alongside you as we fight to cut spending, secure the border, and get our country back on track. Join: Steve Scalise
Let's be clear: This Republican Majority will continue to stand with Israel and their right to defend themselves, eliminate Hamas, and get the hostages back. Join: Steve Scalise
🚨 The House passed a strong bill to send immediate aid to Israel—giving our ally the critical resources and advanced weapons they need to defend themselves against these barbaric Hamas attacks. America must send a clear message that we stand with Israel and the Jewish people amid an alarming rise of antisemitism. Join: Steve Scalise
Iran has made $80 BILLION selling oil since Biden took office—as they bankroll Hamas’s terror. Biden lets them make billions while blocking U.S. oil production. Shameful. The House Republican Majority will take strong action to sanction their oil exports. Biden must be with us. Join: Steve Scalise
🚨 BREAKING → @GOPoversight has uncovered a $40,000 payment of laundered Chinese money directly to Joe Biden himself. Joe Biden isn't just implicated in his family's corruption scheme—he's a key financial beneficiary. https://t.co/sSkhK5FhK0 Join: Steve Scalise
🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ScaliseSteve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,110,491 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ScaliseSteve named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Steve Scalise” (@ScaliseSteve), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ScaliseSteve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.