Channel
@SaveChina53
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002005722940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SaveChina53 |
| Created | 24 October 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SaveChina53 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 51 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 51 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 24 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
您好，至少会提出社会、文化、政治、经济等领域的24条基本解决方案，使国家和人民远离危险。 存入此金额后，这些物品将被放置在该通道中，无论是一般的还是详细的。 与解决一个大国的问题相比，这个数额实在是太小了。 这些事情的实施将加深中国的实力，使中国摆脱巨大的潜在危险。 在大问题发生之前拯救中国 📖📝🔮We properly anticipated the terrible earthquake in eastern Russia, Trump's stroke, Great war between Iran and Israel and explosion in refineries...in @impredictor
您好，欢迎光临 我们认为中国的情况非常好 但形势好的时候也有潜在的风险 那些被忽略的 智者先击退风险 我们已经发现了中国面临的许多风险 如果不采取预防措施或不采取预防措施，将导致灾难 一场巨大的、也许无法挽回的灾难 其中一些风险和灾难是自然的，另一些则是超自然的 我们想做一些有风险的事情 或者大幅减少 。为此，我们需要资金 因为这些东西都是昂贵的 这些任务可以消除灾难和风险 收到 9 个以太坊后我们开始工作 与可能的损害相比，这是一个非常低的成本 我们还放置了必须完成的说明。以太坊充值地址： ETH address on ERC20 network: 0x9c69279f95ea9473dce36e1a1043f5650a6454c9 我们做出了重大预测，包括俄罗斯东部的可怕地震 在这个频道中：@impredictor 我希望我们能够消除中国和人民的这些风险
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @SaveChina53. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,091,284 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“拯救中国 | Save China” (@SaveChina53), 51 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SaveChina53.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.