Практически 2х дали, реально жирно. Остальные тож дали по 30-50%, но именно лол попы сыграли лучше всего Upd: продал по хаям (7 тонов), ну не гений ли?
❤3👍3
Signed Saul

Channel
@Saul_ton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002355703118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Saul_ton |
| Description | @GoodmnSaul — лс |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Saul_ton |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 136 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 136 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
95 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 28.4% | |
| custom 5386587088873331829 | 22 | 23.2% | |
| custom 5319006409830965724 | 15 | 15.8% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 12.6% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 10.5% | |
| 🤬 | 5 | 5.26% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| custom 5861980006502108164 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.05% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Saul_ton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 12 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Практически 2х дали, реально жирно. Остальные тож дали по 30-50%, но именно лол попы сыграли лучше всего Upd: продал по хаям (7 тонов), ну не гений ли?
❤3👍3
Signed Saul
Лол попы +25% тем временем. Люди начинают что-то подозревать 😄 Upd: остальные дешёвые подарки тож +20-25% в среднем уже дали)))
👍4custom 53865870888733318292
Signed Saul
Крафтик вышел, друг словил иксы, поймав легендарный календарь всего за 20 тонов, а я чуть профитнул с флипов. Думаю некст крафтом будут лол поп, так что можете закупить под флип или сам крафт (в большой минус точно не уйдете, а потенциал на несколько иксов имеется нормальный) P.S. Могут быть и любой другой старый ширпотреб (тамагочи, торты, грибы, шапки и т.д.)
custom 53190064098309657243👍2❤1
Signed Saul
Ну не могу я обойти стороной памп подарков, происходящий в последние дни и сделаю свой первый за полгода колл: Тыква относительно саплая недооценена и очень странно видеть её в том ценовом сегменте, где поголовно у каждого саплая в 1.5х больше. Да и многие другие гифты вернулись к хайным ценам (в тонах), тогда как тыква почти в -70% от них. P. S. Это касается и прочих подарков со схожим саплаем: мётел, сердец, любо…
❤5👍3
Signed Saul
Ну и констатирую факт: канал умер (надеюсь временно). Крипта отошла на 2й план, как и цель заработать миллионы на ней. Если что-то и делаю в этой нише, то только изредка флипаю щитки вот тут (и то не всё туда кидаю). Что делать с этим каналом? А я хз, но постараюсь придумать для него все-таки что-нибудь интересное в ближайшее время.
Signed Saul
Сделал канал с тон коллами, так как довольно успешно двигаюсь в этом направлении уже пару месяцев (даже 100х+ коллы были). Пока в качестве пробы всё это, но со временем, думаю, буду на серьëзке заниматься. https://t.me/best_caller_ever P. S. За ваши деньги ответственности не несу, но целенаправленно экзитить не буду, обещаю)))
👍6custom 53190064098309657245🤯2
Signed Saul
Money Pot: Stickers - Emoji Pretty Posy: Stickers - Emoji Bling Binky: Stickers - Emoji
❤3
Signed Saul
NFT upgrades available 🎁 5000⭐️— upgrade for 50000⭐️ 🎁 250⭐️— upgrade for 50000⭐️ 🎁 150⭐️— upgrade for 50000⭐️ Monitor upgrade price changes at @GiftChangesUpdates 🐈⬛ @GiftChanges • Portals ❤️ • Tonnel 🌪 • @GiftNews 🎁
👍3custom 53190064098309657242
Signed Saul
На добивочку
🐳2😢1
Signed Saul
new gifts released 🎃 500⭐️— 250k gifts, max 10 per user Stickers can be found at @GiftChangesStickers Monitor low supply and sold out notifications at @GiftChangesUpdates 🐈⬛ @GiftChanges • Portals ❤️ • Tonnel 🌪 • @GiftNews 🎁
Signed Saul
Я вас понял бля
🤬3custom 58619800065021081641
Signed Saul
Новая нейронка от тг? UPD: Бля лан, не нейронка, но че-то связанное с ней. Слишком много умных слов, основной смысл которых я понял достаточно, чтобы представлять чё да как, но недостаточно, чтоб вам объяснить. https://t.me/cocoon
custom 53190064098309657244
Signed Saul
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Saul_ton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Saul_ton named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Saul” (@Saul_ton), 136 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Saul_ton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.