Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سطر‌های آگاهی

Channel

سطر‌های آگاهی

@SatrhayeAgahi

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

452subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003234383847
TypeChannel
Username@SatrhayeAgahi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SatrhayeAgahi

Previous handles

@SatrhayeAgahi was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@SatrhayeAgahii
held 8 August 20268 August 2026

Growth

419452435.57 August 2026 — 419 subscribers8 August 2026 — 419 subscribers8 August 2026 — 420 subscribers20 August 2026 — 425 subscribers21 August 2026 — 430 subscribers28 August 2026 — 452 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 21 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 414–457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 09:46452+22
21 Aug 2026, 10:44430+5
20 Aug 2026, 11:30425+5
8 Aug 2026, 09:42420+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:32419no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:29419first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 452 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held40 (31 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total5,114
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 40 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4533.3%
👍2820.7%
💯2820.7%
👏1712.6%
💔1410.4%
😢21.48%
👎10.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

شاید بخواهید دوباره آن را بخوانید: خواستن تجربه‌ای مثبت، تجربه‌ای منفی است. پذیرفتنِ تجربه‌ای منفی، تجربه‌ای مثبت است. این همان چیزی است که آلن‌واتس نام آن را قانون وارونه گذاشته بود؛ هرچه بیش‌تر به دنبال احساس بهتری باشید، احساس رضایت کم‌تری خواهید یافت. جست‌وجوی یک چیز، صرفاً تاییدکننده‌ی این حقیقت است که شما اکنون فاقد آن چیز هستید. صرف‌نظر از این‌که واقعا چقدر پول درمی‌‌آورید، هرچه بیش‌تر بخواهید پول‌دار شوید، بی

👍2👏1

19 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ردِ این اشک‌ها، با هزاران لبخند هم از گونه‌های ما پاک نمی‌شود.

💔3😢1

19 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC81 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

در قدیم تهیه آمار مرسوم نبوده تا امروز بتوانیم بگوئیم که در الموت چقدر گندم و برنج و زیتون بدست میآمده و تولیدات دام‌داری سکنه الموت چقدر بوده است. اما دانشمندان اسماعیلیه از روی تخمین نوشته‌اند که در الموت، در سال‌هائی که بارندگی میشد هرسال ششصد هزار خروار گندم و سیصد هزار خروار برنج بدست میامد و اگر وسعت سرزمین الموت را در نظر بگیریم و آن را با وسعت کشورهای مجاورش(که وسیع است) بسنجیم میفهمیم که تولیدات کشاورزی الم

1👏1

18 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

جورج اورول می‌گفت دیدن چیزی که درست جلوی دماغ‌مان است، تقلای زیادی می‌خواهد. خب، راهِ‌حل استرس و اضطراب ما هم درست جلوی دماغ‌مان است؛ اما آن‌قدر سرگرمِ تماشای فیلم‌های مبتذل و تبلیغات دستگاه‌های پرورش اندام هستیم و آن‌قدر به یک همسر بلوند جذاب با ماهیچه‌های شش تکه‌ی شکم فکر می‌کنیم که متوجه راه‌حل نمی‌شویم. 📚هنر ظریف رهایی از دغدغه‌ها 🖊مارک منسن ترجمه‌ی میلاد بشیری #کتاب_بخوانیم کپی⛔️

3

18 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

اگر من کوچک‌ترین علامتی در دست داشتم که شما به من اهمیت می‌دهید، هر کاری که در این دنیا بتواند خوشحال‌تان کند برای‌تان انجام می‌دادم. 📖بابا لنگ‌دراز 🖊جین وبستر کپی ⛔️

1

17 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

اکنون آن مسیحیت سابق وجود ندارد. امروزه تا حدی معنای مسیحیت مبهم و نامعلوم است. به هرحال من فکر می‌کنم دو مطلب مختلف برای کسی که خود را مسیحی می‌خواند کاملا دارای اهمیت است. اولین مطلب که طبیعت انتزاعی و جزمی دارد آن است که بایستی به خداوند ایمان داشت و هم‌چنین فناناپذیری او را پذیرفت اگر به آن دو اعتقاد نداشته باشید فکر نمی‌کنم که بتوانید خود را مسیحی بخوانید. و بعد از آن بایستی اعتقاداتی به مسیح داشته باشید‌. فی‌ال

👍2

17 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

دغدغه‌ی داشتن چیزهای بیش‌تر، برای رونق اقتصاد خوب است. و‌ اگر چه‌ داشتن اقتصاد پُر رونق هیچ اشکالی ندارد، داشتن دغدغه‌های بیش‌ازاندازه، به سلامت روحی و روانی آدم آسیب می‌زند. باعث می‌شود که بیش از حد به چیزهای ظاهری و ساختگی وابسته شوید و زندگی‌تان را وقفِ دنبال کردن سراب خوشحالی و رضایت کنید. کلید زندگی خوب، داشتن دغدغه‌های بیش‌تر نیست؛ بلکه داشتن دغدغه‌های کم‌تر، واقعی‌تر، ضروری‌تر و مهم‌تر است. 📚هنر ظریف رهایی از

3👎1

16 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

پند اخلاقی جامع دیگری از مسیح وجود دارد، ولی فکر نمی‌کنم از دوستان مسیحی ما به آن عمل کنند. او می‌گوید( چنان چه می‌خواهید کامل باشید، هرچه دارید بفروشید و در راه خدا انفاق کنید) این یک پند عالی اخلاقی است ولی همان‌طور که متذکر شدم هیچ‌کس بدان عمل نمی‌کند. 📚چرا مسیحی نیستم 🖊برتراند راسل ترجمهٔ س.الف.س.طاهری #کمی_تفکر کپی ⛔️

💯21

15 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

یک کاغذ سفید را هرچقدر هم که سفید و تمیز باشد کسی قاب نمی‌گیرد برای ماندگاری باید حرفی برای گفتن داشت.. 👤 #فریدون‌_فرخزاد

3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @SatrhayeAgahi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,095,768 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سطر‌های آگاهی” (@SatrhayeAgahi), 452 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SatrhayeAgahi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.