Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 91 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 19:31
41
-1
30 Oct 2026, 20:21
42
+1
16 Oct 2026, 10:56
41
-3
9 Oct 2026, 14:21
44
-1
29 Sept 2026, 21:39
45
+3
15 Sept 2026, 11:39
42
+4
7 Sept 2026, 10:38
38
+1
24 Aug 2026, 06:05
37
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:57
38
+1
10 Aug 2026, 22:01
37
no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:17
37
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
26
32.9%
❤
11
13.9%
🕊
11
13.9%
👍
10
12.7%
⚡
6
7.59%
🏆
4
5.06%
👏
4
5.06%
👌
3
3.80%
💯
2
2.53%
🎃
1
1.27%
🎉
1
1.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Sun'iy intellekt hammaning ishini tortib oladi" deydiganlarga bir og'iz gap bor... 😅
Bugun bitta podkast ko'rib, shu mavzuda ozgina fikrlarimni bo'lishgim keldi. Hozir qaysi soha vakili bilan gaplashmang, AI haqida gapiradi. Lekin chuqurroq tushunmaydigan, mutaxassis bo'lmagan odamlardan ko'p eshityapman: "Bo'ldi, AI hammani ishini tortib oladi, yaqinda odamga hojat qolmaydi" deyishyapti.
Xo'sh, bu qanchalik to'g'…
Sun’iy intelekt haqida juda manfatli podkast bo’libdi
Ai da haliham rasm generatsiya qilib yurgan odamlar buni ko’rishi kerak albatta
Ai ni hozirgi qudrati va bizni ayni vaqtdagi faqat rasm generatsiya qilishni undan so’rashimiz
Xuddiki AQSh va O’zbekiston iqtisodiyotidagi tafovutdek juda katta
Bu podkastni korishilarni tavsiya qilaman
Podkast nomi:Alohida mavzu✅
3 oyda konversiyani 2.7 barobarga oshirdik🔥
Ko'pchilik "natija = ko'proq lead" deb o'ylaydi. Biz buni teskari isbotladik.
Lead sonini kamaytirdik, sotuvni esa oshirdik:
▫️ Aprelda 6 000 ta lead edi → Mayda 4 884 taga tushdi
▫️ Sotuv esa 454 tadan 700 taga yetdi
Konversiya dinamikasi:
▫️ Mart — 9%
▫️ Aprel — 17%
▫️ May — 24.27%
Yondashuvimiz oddiy: biz lead sonining ortidan quvmadik,To'g'ri filtrlash va sifatli le…
📊 Narxdan ko‘ra qimmatroq narsa bor — bu TCO!
TCO o‘zi nima? 🧐
TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) — bu egalik qilishning umumiy qiymati. Ya’ni, mijoz mahsulotni sotib olgan paytdan boshlab, uni ishlatishni to‘xtatguncha sarflaydigan barcha xarajatlari yig‘indisi.
Bunga quyidagilar kiradi:
1. Sotib olish narxi (Direct cost).
2. O‘rnatish va sozlash xarajatlari.
3. Ekspluatatsiya (elektr energiyasi, yoqilg‘i, xizmat haqi)…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SarvarHusanov2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sarvar Husanov blog” (@SarvarHusanov2), 41 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SarvarHusanov2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
