Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 「 𝚂𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑𝙽𝚎𝚎𝚍𝚕𝚎_𝟷𝟿𝟼𝟹 」

Channel

「 𝚂𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑𝙽𝚎𝚎𝚍𝚕𝚎_𝟷𝟿𝟼𝟹 」

@SarahNeedlemouse_GUN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004350597719
TypeChannel
Username@SarahNeedlemouse_GUN
Description──────────────── ⌞˖᯽ ݁˖⌝ ╰┈➤Ну это мой блог, да. Тут о жизни и прочей белеберде. Всё, возвращайся к постам, тут больше не будет инфы.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SarahNeedlemouse_GUN

Growth

3010 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 30 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:15 — 30 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:4611 Aug 2026, 04:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:1530no change
10 Aug 2026, 20:4630first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 30 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total298
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
1
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ ╰┈➤ Как там люди нынче говорят? "Вижу цель, не вижу препятствий"? Ну это прям про меня. Потому что я достала хоть какой-то не типичный сорт чая для "его величества". Я не поведаю как его раздобыла, пусть это секретом останется. Главное чтобы он не сказал "чё ты за говно мне принесла?", иначе я его отпизжу за то что потратила на

5 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ ╰┈➤ Что не встреча с Теей - то пиздец в последнее время. То в обморок падает, что чуть не загорается, то на неё чудище какое-то нападает. Такое ощущение что её кто-то сглазил, хоть я и не особо в это верю. В любом случае, как-то за неё очень волнительно... Удивительно это говорить, но она мне стала близка так или иначе, как лич

4 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ 🤩:: !?!? {БЛЯТЬ ЧЁ ЗА ПИЗДЕЦ???-} *Пронеслась эта мысль в голове Сары. И не на пустом месте по правде говоря. Ей уже чуть не показалось, что Тея сейчас загорится на ровном месте, но вроде как этот момент обошёлся. Взяв быстро Тею на руки, она быстренько ногой открыла дверь и как можно скорее направилась к свободной кушетке, чт

4 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ 🤩:: ...😒 Давай я тебя в медпункт отведу, а то мне чёт это не нравится.. *Не став дожидаться ответа от Адлер, Сара стала её придерживать на всякий случай и стала провожать её до выхода из своей квартиры, и далее уже до выхода из общежития* ⋮ ⌗ ┆🎭🎭 #RPPostй

4 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC9 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ 🤩:: А? Ты про чё? У тебя приступ щас какой-то начнётся? *По интонации это было трудно понять, но по взгляду кажется было видно, что она искренне за собеседницу забеспокоилась. И не удивительно, это случилось внезапно во первых, а во вторых вообще не ясно что с ней происходит. Какая-то мутная и напрягающая херня* ⋮ ⌗ ┆🎭🎭

4 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ *На вопрос Теи она впала в раздумья на какое-то время. Она не то чтобы много примеров видела подобное, зачастую она видела обратный случай, и даже сама такое практиковала, но... Один пример она всё же знала* 🤩:: Нууу... Фатал Эррор же как-то попал сюда, верно? Насколько я знаю он не способен самостоятельно перемещаться из циф

3 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC12 viewsread 11 August 2026

┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ NEEDLES /// ───────────────────── 𐔌 . ⋮ 🌟🌟 .ᐟ ֹ ₊ ꒱ 🤩:: Ну у бурундучихи было более-менее человеческое строение тела, так что приспасабливаться к нему не пришлось, зато я имела возможность создавать разные щиты, что, как по мне, весьма круто было! А что на счёт остальных? Ну... Тут я уже ничего сказать не могу. Кто-то на шипы падал, кого-то на части разрывало, кому-то пытались

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SarahNeedlemouse_GUN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 257,585 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“「 𝚂𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑𝙽𝚎𝚎𝚍𝚕𝚎_𝟷𝟿𝟼𝟹 」” (@SarahNeedlemouse_GUN), 30 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SarahNeedlemouse_GUN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.