Channel
@Saqeb_0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
632subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002354240104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Saqeb_0 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Saqeb_0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 632 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 639 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 639 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 638 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,438 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
15 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دیروز در مورد پژوهشی مطالعه نمودم که در دانشگاه آکسفورد انجام شده بود؛ در نگاه اول فکر کردم این پژوهش را شخص خاصی انجام داده و احتمالاً برای اعتبار بخشیدن به آن، به نام این دانشگاه تمام کرده است، زیرا آکسفورد نامی قدیمی و با اصالت است و این امر بر کسی پوشیده نیست یا برای این نام آکسفورد را آورده که به اعتبارش لطمه بزند، زیرا درخت پر ثمر است که پیوسته سنگها به سویش پرت میشوند؛ در حالیکه به درخت بیثمر توجهی نمی شو…
در کتاب هذه سبیلی بخشی از سخن ایمن العتوم مرا به تأمل فرو برد: «بیتردید هر اثری که میخوانی، ممکن ست مایه اتلاف وقت باشد اما پرسش اصلی این ست که پس از آن همه هزینه وقت، اندیشه و تلاش چه چیزی به دست آوردهای؟ و آیا آنچه به دست آوردهای ارزش آنچه را که برایش صرف کردهای، داشته است؟!» این سخن درمورد نوشتن نیز صادق است. هر متن و مطلبی که مینویسیم، بخشی از عمر ماست که بر صفحه مینشیند. ساعتها فکر و مطالعه، ویرایش …
گفتند مدتی ست کمتر مینویسی...! گفتم نوشتن نیز همانند باغی است که گاهی به آبیاری، گاهی به هرس و گاهی به تأمل نیاز دارد! هر قلمی قبل از آنکه چیزی بنویسد، باید از چشمهای زلال سیراب شود. گاهی فاصله گرفتن کوتاه از نوشتن فرصتی برای جان دادن دوباره به واژگان و عمق بخشی به اندیشهها ست. اگر ذهن از مطالعه تهی شود و دل از اندیشه فاصله بگیرد، واژگان نیز آرام آرام جان خود را از دست خواهند داد. تلاش و حتی انگیزه فراز و فرود …
❤2
https://t.me/Sabeghon400
❤1
این فقط ذهنیت و تجربهای هست که فعلا بهش رسیدهام اینکه اگر نمیشود کاری را کامل انجام داد دلیل نمیشود از همان مقدار ممکن هم صرف نظر کنیم. به نظرم بعضی چیزها بیشتر از آنکه به شدت نیاز داشته باشند، به استمرار نیاز دارند و گاهی همان ده درصد پیوسته، از صد درصد مقطعی اثر بیشتری دارد. فعلا چیزی که برای خودم فهمیدهام این ست: همیشه بین «کامل انجام دادن» و «کاملا کنار گذاشتن» راه سومی هم وجود دارد: ادامه دادن هرچند کم🌱…
❤3
در تنگیها وسعت آشکار میشود، به هنگام دردها امید میتابد و در سختیها انسان راه خروجی مییابد هرچند در نگاه اول دور به نظر برسد و به هنگام غم خداوند برای اندوهگین آرامش نصیب میکند حتی اگر خیالی از گذشته باشد یا سایهای از خاطرات...! اگر خداوند تنگنا را بدون وسعت، درد را بدون امید، سختی را بدون گشایش و غم را بدون شادی میآفرید زندگی برای مخلوق خوشایند نبود و انسان ارزشی برای زندگی نمییافت که بتواند سختیهایش را به…
مطالعه نوشتههای ادبی همانند قدم زدن در ساحل است، فقط قدمها خیس میشوند اما نوشتههای اعتقادی و فکری همانند شنا کردن است، محال است خیس نشده از آن خارج شوی. ما باید کمی جسارت کرده و از ساحل دور شویم، شنای فکری جذاب است! 📔برگی از کتاب 🔖نوت: یک اندیشه در آبهای کم عمق رشد نمیکند. ذهنی که تنها به تکرار دانستههای گذشته اکتفا و بسنده کند، هرگز عمق را تجربه نخواهد کرد. گاهی لازم است با پرسشهای بزرگ رو به رو شو…
زنان در عصر پیامبر ﷺ نسبت به حوادث بی توجه نبودند و چنان شعوری داشتند که در مقابل مسائل و مشکلات اسلام و مسلمانان واکنش نشان میدادند. فعالیت های امروزی مسلمانان نیز نیازمند توجه به زنان و هوشیار شدن ایشان نسبت به نقش مفید و مؤثر خودشان در این فعالیتها است. شیخ احمد السید ⎾✐ @Saqeb_0⏌
❤1
📚خواهر باحجاب من نویسنده: دریا عربی محتوا: دلنگارههای خواهرانه ⎾✐ @Saqeb_0⏌
گاهی آنچه را نوشتهای میپسندیدی و گاهی نه؛ به هر حال بنویس. مراجعه و بازبینی و بازنویسی آنچه پیشتر نوشتهای، نوشتهات را پسندیده و رضایت بخش میسازد. بازنگری بسان قیچی یک دهقان است که علفهای هرز و ناخالصیها را میچیند و از بن بر میکند، همه چیز را به سر جای خودش گذاشته و از نو مرتب میسازد. 📕هذه سبیلی #نکات_چالشی ⎾✐ @Saqeb_0⏌
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
گاهی یک کتاب میخوانی و چیزی به دانسته هایت افزوده میشود اما گاهی فقط نام یک کتاب کل مسیر و سرنوشت زندگی و اندیشه هایت را تغییر میدهد! برای من این اتفاق با همین کتاب «سفر وصلت» از شیخ محمد حسین رخ داد. آشنایی با این شیخ و فعالیتهای رسانه شان، مقدمهای شد برای ترغیب شدن بیشتر به دین و معنویت و مفاهیمی که پیش از آن به این شکل به آنها توجه نکرده بودم. یک جرقه کوچک، شعلهای از شوق یادگیری و برانگیختن تأمل بنیادین در و…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Saqeb_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 260,921 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قلمهای ثاقب✐” (@Saqeb_0), 632 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Saqeb_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.