Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Son_(of)theGoD [Что-то будет🐡]

@SanyatheGoD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002395734067
TypeChannel
Username@SanyatheGoD
DescriptionСомнение нафиг, я реально божие детя щп: @SHTOOO67
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/SanyatheGoD

Growth

36 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:303no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:493first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1870.4%
avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.1
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held9 (11 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total505
Reactions total56
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
885
Videos
21
Links
54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52855223637550131521933.9%
custom 53169089926167460901221.4%
👎1221.4%
🍓47.14%
custom 542928700089513601635.36%
custom 547417895255569831723.57%
🍾23.57%
❤‍🔥11.79%
🌭11.79%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сука вычислю пизду на уши повешу

👎2

13 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Тварь ахуевшая кто Диз поставил

👎2

13 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Реакции я что ли должен ставить?

👎2

13 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC47 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Наконец-та 🥺 ОЧЕНЬ ЗАБАНЫЙ ПЕРЕХОД, БЫЛА КЛАСНА Отдельно кидать не буду

custom 52855223637550131523👎1custom 54292870008951360161

13 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC47 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🍽🍽🍽 » 23.04.26 – 13.08.26 представляю вам итоги ( наконец то ) нашего планшета ! 1. Алич – ALICH_PNG 2. Гобукунари – GBKNR 3. Щербет – SHERBETTARTIST 4. Векёша – VKSY547 5. Тапок – AEROTAPOK 6. Рейка – REIKARAY 7. Саня – SANYATHEGOD 8. Кипр – KATZLITTENKITTEN выражаю большую благодарность всем участникам и их терпению/труду, с вами было приятно работать, у

custom 53169089926167460909🍓4custom 52855223637550131523🍾2👎2custom 54292870008951360162custom 54741789525556983172❤‍🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

обыграть жирный хвост на прайде>>

👎2

13 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

а еще боты... обязательно отписывайтесь этим ботам!! скидывайте им номер карточки с двух сторон и вам откроется мир майнкрафта!!

custom 52855223637550131527👎1

13 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ну Чоу, есть людишки которые застали персеид/солнечное затмение/планеты в ряд?? 🤨

custom 53169089926167460903

11 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @m0rii_nPhoto

всё что могу опубликовать - это фугу на Прайд смп размножаемся

custom 52855223637550131526

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @SanyatheGoD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 338,919 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Son_(of)theGoD [Что-то будет🐡]” (@SanyatheGoD), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SanyatheGoD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.