3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,819–2,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 16:34
2,819
-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:04
2,820
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:08
2,820
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
115.1%
avg views ÷ 2,819 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,240
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
13 (7 June 2026 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
9,730
Reactions total
201
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 26s
Average length
1m 43s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
637 reactions across 13 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
417
65.5%
🔥
135
21.2%
❤🔥
30
4.71%
🤝
10
1.57%
🫡
9
1.41%
🐳
5
0.785%
👍
5
0.785%
👨💻
4
0.628%
🍌
2
0.314%
👏
2
0.314%
💘
2
0.314%
🙏
2
0.314%
🤗
2
0.314%
🤨
2
0.314%
🍾
1
0.157%
🏆
1
0.157%
👌
1
0.157%
💔
1
0.157%
😢
1
0.157%
😭
1
0.157%
4 further kinds
4
0.628%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 637reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 13 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sandigo_StudioUA. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ви чекали, ви питали, і ми повертаємось до вас із новинами по Dispatch, а також шматочком з локалізації гри 🔥
📌 Ми вирішили усі технічні питання, тож наразі, перший епізод перебуває на етапі тестування, тобто вся голосова, текстова та візуальна частина роботи готова, і зараз ми перевіряємо чи все на своїх місцях, аби у вас не виникли проблеми під час занурення у гру
‼️ Щодо офіційної української текстової локалізац…
Вітаю спільното! Це Ваш шановний Blokador після довгої тиші. Поки пан мав вільний час на службі, він оновив українізатор для гри "Бенді та чорнильна машина". Кріпимо його тут поки сам посібник в Steam не оновиться: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pdlz0_YJxlPgocbgaofXir3X2M-08_Yt/view?usp=drivesdk.
Будемо вдячні відгукам щодо помилок та недоліків українізатора.
Заздалегідь перепрошуємо за незручності, з якими ви стик…
Привіт, Ґеймери та Ґеймерки🩸
Давно не радували вас трейлерами до ігор! А там багато цікавого 😏 Тож продовжуємо працювати над трейлерами, щоб ви мали що подивитися.
Оцінюйте новий трейлер "Marvel's Wolverine" та пишіть свої коментарі.
Ставте вподобайки, діліться відео та пишіть, чи плануєте грати в цей шедевр!
🔗https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Sb2ytx_LOI
Принагідно нагадуємо, що ви можете зацінити й інші ігри з на…
Привіт. Ось наші переможці які отримують фігурки!
Напишіть, будь ласка, @SandigoManager1 та прикріпіть свій скрін донату 🙌
На днях відправимо вам призи 🫡
Зібрали ось таку суму з вами 😳
Ви найкращі) дякуємо що були з нами! Перший стрім від Сандіго вийшов непоганим. Далі буде краще та цікавіше!
Обовʼязково підписуйтесь на інших стрімерів! Всім тихої ночі, Слава Україні 🇺🇦
Привіт, ґеймери та ґеймерки!🍓
Починаємо! Розіграш фігурок фанкопоп. Потім граємо в «Meccha Chameleon» із запрошеними гостями ⬅️
Чекаємо на вас ❤️
СТРІМ ТУТ
sandigo_studio ⬅️
Учасники
AndriyDaCosta
warrali
madyfroggy
ser_tina
bar_ozzi
thejulles
ЗБИРАЄМО НА СТАРЛІНКИ - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/98Snhhk1r3
Привіт, ґеймери та ґеймерки!
Нагадуємо, що сьогодні о 18:30 на платформі «Твітч» та «Ютуб» ми проведемо благодійний стрім у підтримку ЗСУ!🇺🇦
Спершу на вас чекатиме довгоочікуваний розіграш фігурок Funko pop, а потім ми зіграємо в «Meccha Chameleon» із запрошеними гостями 😙
Крім цього поспілкуємося з вами про дубляж, локалізації, відпочинемо та зробимо хорошу справу!
Чекаємо на вас 🫶
Посилання буде трохи пізніше, …
🎮Привіт, ґеймери та ґеймерки!
Дякуємо за вашу активність в опитуванні! Рішення прийнято — вже цієї суботи проведемо благодійний стрім разом із веселими та харизматичними стрімерами на Twitch та YouTube 😙
А зараз повідомляємо про старт набору до команди Sandigo!
Ми продовжуємо працювати над українською локалізацією відеоігор та розширюємо команду. Попереду багато роботи: нові локалізації, повернення трейлерів і сін…
🎮 Привіт, геймери та геймерки!
На днях ми завершуємо збір на Starlink для 46-ї ОАеМБр і передаємо зібрані кошти фонду «Тихо», тому зараз нам дуже потрібні ваша підтримка та максимальна активність!
Зібрано 170 тисяч з 200 необхідних 🙌
Якщо ви ще не долучилися до нашого розіграшу фігурок Funko Pop — зараз саме час це зробити!
🔗 Посилання на банку:
[https://send.monobank.ua/jar/5akiZwP1WY]
Також нагадуємо, що наша з…
Привіт Ґеймери та Ґеймерки 🎮
Нагадуємо що проєкт “Outlast” завершений і ви можете насолодитися цією грою 😈
https://youtu.be/sisIYh3KARY?si=ULh7uEwUeQtS4W59
Хочемо подякувати всім хто приклав руку до збору, а особливо спілці «Українська всюди» котра задонатили 9450 грн
Дякую тим хто продвинув збір:
3Dll Live UA
The Decepticon Games
Джойстик у руці
Soul Games
Каскад Сандри - ІГРИ УКРАЇНСЬКОЮ
FETAHMAD
Пан Хантер
Lim…
❤62🔥8❤🔥6🤨2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Sandigo_StudioUA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 250,080 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sandigo_Studio UA” (@Sandigo_StudioUA), 2,819 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sandigo_StudioUA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.