4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 309–312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 12:19
312
+2
15 Aug 2026, 16:47
310
+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:47
309
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:25
309
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.4%
avg views ÷ 312 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.1
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (18 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
791
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
41 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
21
51.2%
❤
17
41.5%
👍
3
7.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня поймала себя на мысли, что почти на каждом разборе мы делаем одно и то же.
Не ищем «идеальные продающие слова».
Мы просто возвращаем речь к обычному человеческому языку.
Вместо:
«Масштабирование конверсии.»
Появляется:
«Сделаем так, чтобы к вам чаще обращались и покупали"
И вот еще парочка примеров, которые могут вам пригодиться уже сегодня:👇
❌ «Повысим уровень клиентского сервиса.»
✅ «Сделаем так, чтобы кл…
Как управлять вниманием людей с помощью одного лишь голоса? 🎙️
В этом видео я использовала короткое вступление из подкаста. И если вы обратите внимание на то, как я говорю - заметите акценты на важных словах.
Кстати, все фишки (акценты, паузы, маркеры), которые я использую в озвучке и эфирах, я детально передаю и на своих занятиях.
Почему это работает:
Интонация - это дорожная карта: мозг слушателя сразу видит, где…
⚡Новый выпуск подкаста "Английский по песням"
Pink и Лана дель Рей: откуда их псевдонимы?
Благодаря кому Лана дель Рей придумала своё имя, а благодаря чему – фамилию? Как этот псевдоним отражает образ певицы? Что Pink сама рассказывает о своём сценическом имени? И при чём тут мальчик из летнего лагеря и фильм Квентина Тарантино?
🎧 Слушать: https://music.yandex.ru/album/9340513/track/154283306?utm_medium=copy_link&…
❌ПОГОВОРИМ ПРО СИНДРОМ САМОЗВАНЦА?
Регулярно сталкиваюсь с ним на занятиях и консультациях.
Чувствуете, что ваш успех - это случайность, а вас вот-вот разоблачат? Это классический синдром самозванца. Самое интересное, что чаще всего с ним сталкиваются именно мыслящие и способные люди.
Этот синдром держится на трех иллюзиях:
Обесценивание: "мне просто повезло, я ничего не умею".
Идеализация других: "все вокруг профи…
Почти все угадали в опросе! 🔥
Но у этого слова есть своя интересная история.
В коротком аудио рассказываю, что такое бирде́кель, откуда появилось это название и почему теперь вы его точно не забудете. 🎙️🍺👇
⏺Расширяем словарный запас и проверяем интуицию в нашей регулярной рубрике #словетека! 🧠
Сегодня на повестке дня слово, которое вы точно видели в действии, но, возможно, не знали, как оно называется официально.
Голосуйте в опросе ниже: что это на самом деле? 🙃
(расшифровка правильного ответа, как обычно, за мной)
Широкая улыбка и четкая артикуляция - это не просто «красивая картинка», а мощный инструмент влияния на мозг и окружающих, ребята!
🚀 Почему это важно на уроках и в жизни
Включает «резонаторы»: Улыбка приподнимает щеки и открывает рот. Голос сразу звучит объемно, ярко и уверенно.
Убирает кашу во рту: Активная артикуляция тренирует ленивые мышцы лица. Вас понимают с первого раза без переспрашиваний.
Влияет на биохими…
Как случайно не сказать клиенту: «Ты мне не важен»? 🤫
В работе над речью и голосом мы часто прокачиваем дикцию, интонации, убираем «э-э-э» и «м-м-м». Но есть одна деталь, которая может разрушить впечатление быстрее, чем любая запинка.
Это то, как вы называете людей. Точнее - забываете их имена.
В постоянном общении с клиентами, коллегами или подписчиками помнить имя - это базовый маркер уважения.
( Увы, я тоже иногда…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SamsonovaKate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, кто победит сегодня в финале ЧМ по футболу
🇦🇷 Аргентина38%
🇪🇸 Испания54%
👑 Красивый футбол (Главное - шоу, а не счет)8%
🤝 Обе команды (Разделите кубок напополам!)0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катя Самсонова | Голос и речь” (@SamsonovaKate), 312 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SamsonovaKate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.