Channel
@Samandriel_Alfie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003811439669 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Samandriel_Alfie |
| Description | Привет путник! Звать меня можешь Самандриэлем, тут я не хочу ничего сверхъестественного донести, просто наслаждайтесь Канал привязан к - https://t.me/AngelRadioSetka |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 13 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Samandriel_Alfie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 29 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 29 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411348803695450671 | 10 | 31.3% | |
| custom 5323254763846932903 | 9 | 28.1% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5431569767423047519 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 3.13% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
-Пока ждал хоть весточки от Гадриэля — ну вы знаете, как это бывает: пялишься в экран, а там тишина, — решил не киснуть и прогуляться по лесу. И не зря! Тут столько воздуха, столько зелени… Деревья тянутся к небу, свет пробивается сквозь листву — будто сам мир шепчет, что всё будет хорошо.
🕊1custom 53232547638469329031custom 54113488036954506711
— Привет, Гадриэль. Знаешь, тут у меня в последнее время такая тишина, что даже собственные шаги по полу звучат как что-то чересчур громкое. А ведь обычно тишина — это то, к чему мы, ангелы, должны стремиться: ни криков, ни молитв, ни суеты человеческой, просто покой. Но сейчас эта тишина будто давит. И я вдруг поймал себя на мысли, что мне не хватает… ну, не знаю, твоего сдержанного тона, твоих коротких ответов, в …
— Гадриэль, Гадриэль. Я давно на Земле, можно сказать что успел кое-чему научиться у людей. Я видел, как они общаются.У них это называется просто — "подкат".
👀3
— Скажи, Гадриэль, это правда, что звезды начинают сиять сильнее, когда человек чувствует себя уютно рядом с другим? Как я сейчас с тобой.
custom 54113488036954506713
Слова Гадриила, сказанные с непривычным, почти болезненным придыханием, заставили меня буквально оцепенеть. Я не привык к теплу. На Небесах, где каждый шаг воина подчинялся строгому регламенту, искреннее сочувствие казалось чем-то невозможным, почти контрабандой. И когда Гадриил подошёл так близко, заглядывая, казалось, в самые потаенные уголки моей измученной кошмарами души, я забыл, как дышать. Внутри у меня что-т…
☃2custom 53232547638469329032custom 54113488036954506712
Я стал подходить к Гадриэлю ближе, потому что он не отреагировал на мой тихий кашель. Ну, я мог догадаться, что он не услышит его. Когда я подошёл и положил руку на его плечо, к моему сильному удивлению, он вздрогнул и, видимо, испугался, забыв, что вообще меня ждёт... От этого мне стало смешно, и я немного хихикнул. Когда он повернулся и мы начали разговаривать, всё дошло до вопроса «как дела?» Ну или что-то типа то…
Адм- вот вам от меня подгон:
☃1custom 53232547638469329031custom 54113488036954506711
« новое сообщение от пользователя 'Гадриэль🙃' » Я сидел на полу и играл с Ричи, как увидел, что мне пришло сообщение от Гадриэля. Он писал, что готов встретиться хоть сейчас, и ещё много добрых слов. Честно говоря, его слова заставили меня улыбнуться... Странное чувство тепла в душе. Ну ладно. Я решил, что ничего не буду отвечать и просто приду. Надеюсь, он не будет ждать моего ответа, а то получится немного неприко…
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ Снова этот холод. Он пробирает до самых костей, хотя в комнате тепло.. На часах 01:40. Самое глухое, мертвое время ночи. Я резко сажусь на постели, хватая ртом воздух, словно всё еще нахожусь там, в той темной, сырой комнате. С висков стекают капли холодного пота. Руки дрожат так сильно, что я не могу сжать их в кулаки... Опять этот кошмар. Пытки Кроули. Его лицо, его издевательский голос, шорох инстр…
custom 53232547638469329033custom 54113488036954506712
Благодарю!
custom 53232547638469329031custom 54113488036954506711
—Здравствуй, Гадриэль! Твой ответ — это уже огромное облегчение и радость, и тебе совершенно не за что извиняться передо мной. На небесах или на Земле, время всегда течет слишком запутанно, чтобы упрекать кого-то за долгие ответы. Главное, что ты наконец отозвался! Твои слова о принятии... Пожалуйста, не благодари меня за это. Мне не нужно было проявлять особое добродушие, чтобы понять тебя. Я ведь просто смотрел на…
— Привет, Гадриэль. Знаешь, для меня это мало что меняет. Ты остаешься тем же ангелом, с которым мы общались, и никакие тайны прошлого этого не перечеркнут! Мне искренне интересно, как ты сейчас? Как твои дела, как себя чувствуешь после всего, что свалилось? Наверняка тебе сейчас непросто.. Давай встретимся? Просто снимем эти человеческие оболочки хотя бы на вечер — фигурально выражаясь, конечно.. Погуляем, пройде…
custom 54315697674230475192
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Samandriel_Alfie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 403,095 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Samandriel_Alfie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ꮶᴧуб ᴧюбиᴛᴇᴧᴇй ᴄиᴩᴏᴨᴀ и ʙᴇжᴧиʙᴏᴄᴛи.” (@Samandriel_Alfie), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Samandriel_Alfie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.