Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 92 days, net -2,981. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,151–36,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 09:56
28,620
-221
5 Nov 2026, 07:30
28,841
-203
4 Nov 2026, 06:31
29,044
-258
3 Nov 2026, 05:51
29,302
-83
2 Nov 2026, 06:56
29,385
-97
1 Nov 2026, 07:28
29,482
-77
31 Oct 2026, 06:41
29,559
-120
30 Oct 2026, 05:40
29,679
-82
29 Oct 2026, 06:19
29,761
-142
28 Oct 2026, 03:29
29,903
-36
27 Oct 2026, 03:49
29,939
-21
26 Oct 2026, 03:29
29,960
-55
25 Oct 2026, 01:27
30,015
-59
24 Oct 2026, 00:36
30,074
-61
23 Oct 2026, 02:56
30,135
-37
22 Oct 2026, 04:00
30,172
-722
21 Oct 2026, 01:19
30,894
-1,177
20 Oct 2026, 00:34
32,071
-42
19 Oct 2026, 00:35
32,113
-40
18 Oct 2026, 02:27
32,153
first reading
Engagement
756 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 135 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.34%
avg views ÷ 28,620 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
276 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
276
of 756 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
756 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
342,520
Reactions total
17,617
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 00:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,200
Videos
≈76
Links
≈1,770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45,825 reactions across 746 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
22,221
48.5%
🔥
12,168
26.6%
👍
10,624
23.2%
🍾
812
1.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 756 of the 756 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,362 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 756 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 756 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sam_Trade_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 756 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 276 posts held from the last 30 days (2.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴 نتایج آمار اشتغال آمریکا منتشر شد؛ دادهها به نفع دلار!
🇺🇸 مهمترین آمارهای منتشرشده:
🟣 NFP: عدد واقعی ۱۶۵ هزار نفر | پیشبینی ۵۹ هزار نفر
🔴نرخ بیکاری: ۴.۱٪ | پیشبینی ۴.۲٪
🔵 رشد دستمزد ساعتی: ۰.۴٪
📊 تحلیل تأثیر بر بازار کریپتو:
آمار اشتغال آمریکا بهمراتب قویتر از انتظارات منتشر شد و کاهش نرخ بیکاری نیز نشاندهنده استحکام بازار کار آمریکاست.
این موضوع میتواند احتمال کاهش سریع نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو را کمتر کند…
🔴 امروز مهمه ساعت 17 حواست به بازار باشه !!
مهمترین رویداد، انتشار همزمان آمار اشتغال آمریکا و کاناداست.
◀️اگر NFP قویتر از انتظار منتشر بشه و نرخ بیکاری کاهش پیدا کنه، احتمال تقویت دلار و فشار بر طلا بیشتر میشه.
◀️اما اگر اشتغال ضعیفتر از انتظار باشه، بازار ممکنه احتمال کاهش نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو رو بیشتر در نظر بگیره؛
اتفاقی که میتونه به نفع طلا باشه.
🚀Telegram
✅ کشبک 300%؛ واریز کن و از SAM TRADE سه برابرشو بگیر!
واریز ۱۰$ ⭐️ ۳۰$ ووچر
واریز ۵۰$ ⭐️ ۱۵۰$ ووچر
واریز ۱۰۰$ ⭐️ ۳۰۰$ ووچر
واریز ۵۰۰$⭐️ ۱,۵۰۰$ ووچر
➖ پرداخت پاداش هر دوشنبه و جمعه
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
〰️ شرایط مهم دریافت پاداش:
ثبتنام از طریق لندینگ پیج، واریز از منابع خارج از اوربیت، تأیید شماره و نگهداری دارایی در فیوچرز تا زمان واریز جایزه.
🤩 به اوربیت واریز کن و جایزه ویژه بگیر:
https://www.ourbit.com/activity/kol?id…
💸اگر می خواید عضویت داخل 🧻VIP🧻 سام ترید و سود های چند برابری ولت و موجودیتون داشته باشید به آیدی قرار شده پیام بدید✉️💵
ما تو 💎VIP💎 صفر تا صد دنیای کرییپتو رو بهتون به شخصه آموزش خواهم داد و اگر صفر هستی نگران نباش😎🚀...
💥24 ساعته هر مشکلی هر وقت داشتی رفعش کن با ما
سیگنال های پر سود انفجاری بازار رو از دست نده 👑↗️
جهت عضویت به آیدی بنده پیام بدید👇
@malekbitcoin
📊 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
💻 Symbol: #UNI/USDT
⏱ Timeframe: 4H
📈 Market Trend: صعودی / نزولی
⛏ Leverage: 20X – 25X
🔍 تحلیل تکنیکال:
[بار ها و بار ها با این مقاومت برخورد داشته و می تونه یه حرکت نهنگی تو تایم فریم 4 ساعته با شکست مقاومت تا محدوده خطی مقاومت بعدی داشته باشه ولی حتما صبر نیاز داره منتظر پایان این لگ نزولی می مونیم و با تأییدحجم می تونید قبل برخورد با مقاومت بگیرید در غیر این صورت صبر تا فی…
👼#PUMP👼
⭐️LONG⭐️
😈ENTRY:MARKET😈
🧻TP:0.004458_0.004631_0.004779_0.005062🧻
💔SL:0.004044💔
💀(1_2%W)💀
✨LV:20_50✨
🎁سرمایه اولیه برای رفرال های سام ترید تا سقف 2,000$ پاداش به همراه بونوس با فقط ثبت نام ساده به مبلغ 150$
@Sam_Trade_ir 👈
مدیریت سرمایه فراموش نشه لطفا طبق ستاپ پیش برید 🤝
🔍 نکته امروز: هر چیزی که روی چارت میبینی، سیگنال نیست!
گاهی بعد از ساعتها بررسی نمودار، ذهنت شروع میکنه از هر حرکت کوچکی یک الگوی معاملاتی بسازه. 📉🎭
یک سایهی بلند، یک کندل قوی یا یک شکست کوچک لزوماً به معنی فرصت ورود نیست.
📌 قبل از ورود، بررسی کن آیا نشانهها در کنار هم یک ستاپ معتبر ساختهاند یا فقط داری به چند اتفاق پراکنده معنا میدی؟
🕹 تحلیل حرفهای یعنی تشخیص تفاوت بین نویز بازار و رفتار معنادار قیمت.
…
#BTC.D
🚨دامیننس تتر فعلا صعودی در تایم فریم های بالا تر که این نشونه خیلی خوبی با صعود بیت بود چرت حالا؟؟؟
چون می تونیم انتظار رنج زدن دامیننس تتر و استراحتش داشته باشیم که موجب پامپ آلت کوین ها رو داره می تونید ببینید از شاخص آلت کوین ها مثل #OTHERS.D هم که بسیاری از آلتکوین ها هنوز حرکت صعودی که بیت داشت و شروع نکردن🚀🤑
@Sam_Trade_ir
❤30🔥18👍16🍾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 756 posts we hold for @Sam_Trade_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
امروز کسی به خاطر معاملات شخصی خودش بابت نوسان شدید بازار ضرر کرده⁉️
آره ، سر خود ترید کردم ضررم😢57%
نه، پشت دست سام ترید بازی کردم سودم🤑44%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 756 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Sam_Trade_ir named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@sam_trade_chat named in 8 posts, 2 October 2026 – 13 October 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bigi crypto exchange @bigiexchange · 24,696 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAM TRADE|سام ترید” (@Sam_Trade_ir), 28,620 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sam_Trade_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.