Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сальников ProCrypto 🇷🇺

@Salnikov_ProCrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

798subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002192180694
TypeChannel
Username@Salnikov_ProCrypto
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Salnikov_ProCrypto

Growth

798799798.57 Aug 2026, 08:02 — 799 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:26 — 798 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:027 Aug 2026, 23:26
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 798–799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 23:26798-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:02799first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 798 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,078
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1336.1%
🔥925.0%
💯719.4%
👎25.56%
👏25.56%
😁25.56%
12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Если вы эксперт и вам нужен такой контент завод для соц сетей - пишите, расскажу более подробно, что за предложение 🤝

👎1💯1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC123 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Концепция Этой Мрази не остановится, пока они сами не уйдут в тотальное разрушение!!!

💯3

22 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC159 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ponomarenko_blogPhoto

Россия делает исторический шаг в регулировании криптовалют. Государственная Дума приняла новый Федеральный закон «О цифровых валютах и цифровых правах». Это не очередные поправки и не уточнение отдельных норм. Перед нами документ объемом 150 страниц, который фактически создает в России новую отрасль финансового права. ФЗ о криптовалюте 2026.07.pdf Самое интересное заключается в том, что государство не запрещает кри

👍4👎1

15 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC156 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Coin_Post

Рынки выглядят так, будто сошли с ума, сектор полупроводников удваивается, а мультипликатор Price-to-Sales (цена к продажам) взлетел до максимумов с 1946 года – он на порядок выше любого пика за последние 80 лет. Наткнулся на интервью с гендиректором VanEck ($230 млрд под управлением). Сделал для вас выжимку главного. Почему этот "космический" рост оправдан и чего на самом деле ждать 👇 1️⃣ Многие сравнивают текущу

👍2

15 Jul 2026, 04:36 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ponomarenko_blogPhoto

Киберэкономика: свобода или цифровое рабство? Человечество оказалось между двумя стремительно растущими силами. Первая — технологический прогресс. Он создаёт невероятные возможности, но одновременно несёт новые угрозы: тотальный контроль, власть цифровых монополий и зависимость человека от искусственного интеллекта. Вторая — способность самих технологий помочь нам справиться с этими угрозами. Любая экономическая

👍3

13 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇷🇺 Цифровой рубль (CBDC) может дать экономике России 423 млрд рублей в год, основную выгоду, по расчетам, получит бизнес — за счет более дешевых и быстрых платежей, автоматизации расчетов и упрощения трансграничных операций.

😁2

6 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC284 viewsread 7 August 2026

PayPal мафия в игре😕 ✖️ Ripple официально получила полное одобрение MiCA для предоставления криптовалютных услуг по всей Европе 🇪🇺 #Ripple #MiCA #Европа #XRP

6 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC267 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Gonka AI теперь на Dune: Эпоха прозрачности началась Проект Gonka AI стал еще более открытым и профессиональным. Теперь вся базовая ончейн-аналитика доступна на Dune Analytics — главном мировом стандарте для отслеживания блокчейн-данных в реальном времени 🔗🌐 ⁉️ Что это значит для сообщества и инвесторов Dune — это «лакмусовая бумажка» для любого серьезного блокчейн-проекта 👍 Если проект есть на Du

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Salnikov_ProCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 287,458 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сальников ProCrypto 🇷🇺” (@Salnikov_ProCrypto), 798 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Salnikov_ProCrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.