5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 08:22
244
-2
24 Aug 2026, 08:15
246
-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:31
250
no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:15
250
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:31
251
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
319 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
112
35.1%
👍
97
30.4%
🔥
49
15.4%
💯
20
6.27%
👌
13
4.08%
🙏
9
2.82%
😁
7
2.19%
👏
6
1.88%
🕊
3
0.94%
😎
2
0.627%
🤝
1
0.313%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sales_Management_Results. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 16 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,050
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
83.0
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJeUruo
1
19 March 2026
19 March 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 16 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Давайте разберём три стадии подробнее.
Потому что главная ошибка - это лечить не то, что болит.
Брать отпуск, когда нужны системные изменения. Менять работу, когда нужно менять направление.
💡 Стадия 1 "Усталость"
Симптомы: нет сил к вечеру, раздражительность, хочется выспаться и отключиться
Что происходит: ресурс временно исчерпан. Тело и голова просят перезагрузки.
Что помогает: отпуск 1-2 недели, смена обстановк…
Выгорание
Одно из самых популярных слов последних лет.
Все о нём говорят. Но мало кто понимает разницу между тремя состояниями, которые мы постоянно путаем. И именно из-за этой путаницы люди годами лечат не то, что болит.
💡Усталость
Ты хочешь отдохнуть и вернуться. Ты представляешь как выспишься, переключишься, и вновь почувствуешь интерес к работе. Тело устало, но внутри ещё есть огонь.
Лечится отпуском. Двух недел…
Большинство планерок - это адская пытка.
60 минут❗️ разговоров ни о чём. Все смотрят в телефоны. Руководитель говорит, а команда молчит. В конце никто не помнит о чём договорились.
Предлагаю перейти на эффективные 15 минут.
Как организовать время:
⏱️ 0–3 минуты
Цифры вчера: Факт vs план. Каждый называет свою цифру. Без обсуждений, без оправданий. Просто факт.
⏱️ 3–8 минут
Фокус на сегодня: Каждый называет один гла…
Деньги мотивируют. Но ненадолго 👀 👀 👀
Через 2-3 месяца после повышения зарплаты человек возвращается на тот же уровень мотивации.
Это не жадность - это физиология каждого человека.
Значит ли это, что платить не надо? Ну конечно нет.
Деньги- это гигиенический фактор,а их отсутствие демотивирует каждого человека и доводит до истерики. Но их наличие не мотивирует само по себе.
Поделюсь своими наработками, которые доль…
Большинство руководителей смотрят на выручку. В конце месяца. Когда уже ничего не изменить.
Это как смотреть в зеркало заднего вида и пытаться управлять машиной.
Опережающие показатели - это другое. Это цифры, которые говорят, что будет через 2-3 недели если ничего не менять. Дает возможность видеть проблему заранее и успеваешь исправить.
❗️Вот 7 показателей, которые я смотрю каждый день для оценки отдела продаж❗️…
Конец месяца. Менеджеры виноваты в чём угодно кроме себя.
Рынок плохой. Клиенты не те. Продукт дорогой. Сезон не тот.
Знакомо?
Ну конечно😂 ...
А если еще и новый руководитель, то вообще все плачут и причитаю о том, что хз как им плн ставили.
Сколько слез пролито во всех организациях, особенно за неделю до конца месяца или при расчете зп...
Но на самом деле причины не в цифрах планах и табличках.
5 реальных причин п…
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Есть в каждом отделе продаж. Тот самый 😎
Продаёт лучше всех и знает об этом.
Жалуется на коллег, интригует, подрывает авторитет руководителя. Команда его терпит, потому что он приносит деньги.
И вот ты стоишь перед выбором.
За свою работу я видела этот сценарий десятки раз. И честно — нет универсального ответа.
Но есть три признака когда точно надо увольнять, без разговоров:
1️⃣Его поведение уже влияет на результ…
Оооо да.... хеллоу! Пропали на два месяца. Сдулись?
Не буду придумывать красивые объяснения.
Работа съела нас целиком. Каждый из нас в этот период вёл свои проекты, разбирался с командами и собственниками и просто не было сил на канал.
Да так бывает!
Мы делимся кейсами о том, как не выгорать на работе, как разделять рабочее и собственное время, но бывает разное и мы не исключение.
Но знаете что?
Мы скучали. ❤️❤️❤️…
❤5🙏2🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sales_Management_Results. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 16 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Практики бизнеса и продаж” (@Sales_Management_Results), 244 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sales_Management_Results.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.