SAIYAN WHALES π GAMBLES pinned a photo

Channel
SAIYAN WHALES π GAMBLES
@Saiyanwhales
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
487subscribers
-66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002185926336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Saiyanwhales |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Saiyanwhales |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 487 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 493 | -33 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 526 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 527 | -15 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 542 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 553 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 553 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
257 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 76 | 29.6% | |
| π | 71 | 27.6% | |
| π₯ | 61 | 23.7% | |
| π | 49 | 19.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
β€6π6π3π₯1
JUST IN: X is down worldwide. @WatcherGuru
π₯8π3π3β€2
β Mushroom Buy! ππ π 0.10 TON ($0.15) π 25,085.80 MUSH π€ UQC...oVR7y: >2508.6%βTxn π΅ Price: $0.0β 60982 π΅ MarketCap: $6,098 β€οΈ TonMarketCapβπ Chart
β€7π4π₯4π3
JUST IN: Elon Musk becomes first person in history to surpass a $600 billion net worth. @WatcherGuru
π₯6π5β€2π2
JUST IN: $180,000,000,000 added to the crypto market cap today. @WatcherGuru
β€5π5π₯3π2
# π Introducing $MUSH β The Token of Regeneration Contract: EQBFrtkv3zitBpW4qcrxsEp_Bm1OyzJRJ3_QKB1u5wpONeIJ Telegram: πΏ Community Hub β [https://t.me/mushfoundation](https://t.me/mushfoundation) π Holders Chat β [https://t.me/mushroomcoinchat](https://t.me/mushroomcoinchat) --- In a world drowning in noise, speculation, and shallow incentives, $MUSH steps forward with a completely different purpose β to *regeneraβ¦
π6π6π₯5β€3
SAIYAN WHALES π GAMBLES pinned a photo
π¨π¨π° The whale who shorted before Trump's tariff is now shorting $ETH. He has opened a $15,048,500 ETH short position with 5x leverage. @News_Crypto
π₯8π7β€2π1
π₯Introducing ETH6900, a groundbreaking new asset that is set to redefine how we think about trading and market dynamics. Inspired by the ebbs and flows of the traditional stock market, ETH6900, offers a unique and innovative opportunity for investors looking to capitalize on the evolving landscape of finance and DeFI. Website: https://eth6900.wtf Twitter: https://x.com/Eth6900_X Telegram: https://t.me/Eth6900_T Cβ¦
π7β€4π3π₯2
SAIYAN WHALES π GAMBLES pinned a photo
GM βοΈ
β€7π3π2π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Saiyanwhales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@WatcherGuru Β· 627,7154 postsBrain - Portal
@askbrain_ai Β· 2481 postETH6900
@Eth6900_T Β· 41 post$MUSH Foundation
@mushfoundation Β· 1041 postCrypto News
@news_crypto Β· 99,9371 postsolanabrotherhood
@solanabrotherhood Β· 61 postSUICORN | SUI
@suicorn Β· 391 post@TonMarketCap
@tmcListing Β· 4,3081 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSAIYAN WHALES π GAMBLESβ (@Saiyanwhales), 487 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Saiyanwhales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.