3 measurements taken within a single day, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 420–471 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 02:07
465
+39
6 Aug 2026, 19:30
426
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:31
426
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.7%
avg views ÷ 465 subscribers
Avg views / post
333
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (11 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
4,667
Reactions total
238
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
331 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
182
55.0%
🔥
53
16.0%
❤
44
13.3%
🐳
12
3.63%
❤🔥
9
2.72%
👀
8
2.42%
🥰
7
2.11%
🌭
5
1.51%
👏
4
1.21%
🍓
3
0.906%
🤓
2
0.604%
🍌
1
0.302%
🥱
1
0.302%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Восточное Чжоу - эпоха Чуньцю и рождение китайской цивилизации
В 771 году до н. э. войско западночжоуского вана было разбито кочевниками, сам правитель погиб в плену, а его наследник Пинван перенёс столицу на восток, в город Лои. Именно с этим событием традиционная китайская историография связывает начало эпохи Восточного Чжоу. Важно подчеркнуть характер этого перелома: в отличие от падения предшествующей династии Ш…
Гоплитская революция - как копьё изменило политику Древней Греции
Военная история архаической Греции демонстрирует редкий по наглядности случай прямой связи между технологией вооружения и политическим устройством общества. Речь идёт о так называемой Великой гоплитской революции - процессе, растянувшемся приблизительно с конца VIII по VI век до н. э. и коренным образом изменившем не только тактику боя, но и саму стру…
Псков до Пскова
Формирование псковско-эстонской границы - вероятно, древнейшей и самой устойчивой из всех современных границ России - восходит к процессам полуторатысячелетней давности, задолго до появления самого понятия «Русь» как политического образования. Речь идёт об этнической границе, обозначившей ареол расселения славянских племён на северо-западе.
До прихода славян центральную и северную части будущей Псков…
Новгород и немцы. Как начиналась торговля, которая кормила Ганзу
Новгородская внешняя торговля прошла три этапа. Становление - XI–XIII века. Расцвет - XIV–XV века, эпоха Ганзы, ставшая предметом фундаментальной монографии А. Л. Хорошкевич «Торговля Великого Новгорода с Прибалтикой и Западной Европой в XIV–XV веках» (М., 1963). Закат - конец XV–XVI века, когда Иван III упразднил Немецкий двор. Разберём начало.
Задол…
Итоги кельтов и немного о средних веках
Сужение ареала расселения кельтов с обширных территорий континентальной Европы до изолированных анклавов на северо-западной периферии - один из ключевых сюжетов медиевистики. Этот процесс, растянувшийся более чем на тысячу лет, детально исследуется в западной академической науке, в частности, в рамках междисциплинарных подходов, сочетающих историю, лингвистику и археологию.
…
Кельты. Сравнение с даками, и откуда они появились
Кельтские языки когда-то звучали от Анатолии до Британских островов. Сегодня они теплятся только на северо-западной окраине Европы. Три тысячи лет назад носители этих языков контролировали половину континента. Вопрос «откуда они взялись» занимал лингвистов и археологов больше века. Генетика недавно дала окончательный ответ.
Три гипотезы бились друг с другом долго. …
Кельтская религия
Когда галльский вождь Бренн в III веке до н.э. захватил Дельфы и обнаружил в греческом святилище антропоморфные статуи богов - он громко смеялся. Для кельта это выглядело примитивно. Кельтская религия доримского периода почти не знала богов в человеческом облике - только силы, стихии, пространства между мирами. Это фундаментальное отличие, которое современная наука только начинает осмыслять системн…
Военное дело галлов
Для галлов война была не столько исключительным событием, сколько основой социального порядка - явлением столь же привычным, как и сама жизнь. Вопреки устаревшему представлению о кельтах как о неорганизованных «варварах», их военное искусство, особенно в тактике, было достаточно развитым.
Тактика на поле боя
Кельты умели применять сложные построения. Ключевой эпизод, иллюстрирующий это, приводи…
Следующий пост будет о военной тактике кельтов, более подробный. После него про культуру и религию (два отдельных), завершит античную серию пост о современном состоянии кельтов.
Расселение кельтов
Миграции кельтов IV–III веков до н. э. традиционно представляют как масштабное переселение народов, стремительно распространившее латенскую культуру от Атлантики до Малой Азии. Однако современные исследования рисуют гораздо более сложную картину. Археология действительно фиксирует стремительное расширение латенского мира, но изотопный анализ, палеоэкология и новые модели общественного развития зас…
👍14❤2🔥2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SagaDruida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О военной тактике кельтов (конкретные приёмы и т.д)41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 374,101 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сага Друида” (@SagaDruida), 465 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SagaDruida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.