Channel
@SafarHawali
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,364subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001527472085 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SafarHawali |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SafarHawali |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 1,364 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 1,365 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 1,366 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 1,365 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (23 May 2026 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 750 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
65 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 73.8% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 13.8% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 6.15% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 6.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعد أسبوعين من اعـتـقـالـه من منزله في جنين، أصدرت محكمة الاحڌلال حكما بالسجن الإداري لمدة ستة أشهر بحق الشيخ محمد سليمان العباهرة. ولكن لأنه شيخ، فلن يتحدث عنه أحد، ولن يتصدر اسمه العناوين.
👍5❤3
مخيفٌ جدًّا أن يمضي عمرك وأنت لم تفهم كلامَ ربك! بل ولم تُحدِّث نفسك يومًا أن تقرأ تفسيرًا مختصرًا لبعض السور التي تُصلِّي بها، أو على الأقل تطَّلع على كلماتِ غريبِة فالقرآن. اللهم أعنَّا على ضبطِ القرآن وفهمِه والعملِ به.
❤6
المصحف المرتل، نسخة الإذاعة المصرية بصوت القارئ الشيخ: محمد صديق المنشاوي -رحمه الله- @El_Menchaoui_bot
❤2
•• سب اللهِ واشتِهَارُهُ في بَلَدٍ، أَعْظَمُ من استحلال الزنى وتشريعِهِ فيها، وأعْظَمُ من فاحشة قومِ لُوطٍ وتشريعِها؛ لأن كُفْرَ استحلالِ الفواحش كُفْرٌ سَبَبُهُ جَحْدُ تشريعٍ من تشريعات الله واستهانةٌ بأمرٍ من أوامره، وأما السب؛ فكُفْرٌ سَبَبُهُ الكُفْرُ بذاتِ المُشَرعِ، والكُفْرُ بذات المُشَرع يَلزَمُ منه كُفْرٌ بجَميعِ تشريعِهِ، واستهانةٌ بها؛ وهذا أعظَمُ وأشد، مع كَوْنِ كِلَا الفِعْلَيْنِ كفرًا؛ إلا أن الكُفْرَ …
❤3🫡2
من البشارات العظيمة أن ينشأ الشاب في عبادة الله . ذكر النبي ﷺ سبعة يظلهم الله في ظله، ومنهم: "شاب نشأ في عبادة الله" متفق عليه قال العلماء ــ رحمهم الله ــ : خصه لكونه مظنّة غلبة الشهوة، فمن لازم الطاعة في شبابه دلّ ذلك على قوة إيمانه فجوزي بظل الرحمن. . وقال الحافظ #ابن_رجب ـ رحمه الله ـ : فإن الشباب شُعبة من الجنون، وهو داع للنفس إلى استيفاء الغرض من شهوات الدنيا ولذاتها المحظورة، فمن سَلم منه فقد سلم. [فتح الباري]…
❤7👍4💯2
ألف يوم مرّت على غزة، ولم يكن الصمود فيها شعاراً، بل طريقة للنجاة. في الخيام، وبين الركام، وتحت الخوف اليومي، بقي الناس يتمسكون بالحياة بما تبقّى لهم من قوة. صبروا، ثبتوا، وواصلوا الوقوف رغم كل ما أُخذ منهم.
🫡2
يا مسكين، وهل أنتَ ستغيّر العالم؟! تلك كلمة تسمعها من مبغض للدين يريد إحباطك. ومن محب لك، فارغ القلب من الهم لهذا الدين، يخشى عليك الأذى أو أن يفوتك من نعيم الدنيا نصيب.. أنت ستغيّر العالم، فالله سبحانه لا يغيّر أحوال الأمّة بالخوارق وأهلها نائمون! أنت ستغيّر العالم، فإنّ تبدّل الأحوال حصيلة أعمار ينفقها الصالحون على مدى أزمان وليس ضربة عصا ساحر .. أنت ستغيّر العالم لأنّ وعد الله آت إن بذل الصالحون جهدهم في الخير .. …
❤9
لا يصح في صيام يوم الحادي عشر مع عاشوراء حديث، ومن فاته التاسع وأراد صيام الحادي عشر مع عاشوراء لمخالفة اليهود فحسن؛ لدخوله في معنى المخالفة.
💯2
فضل صوم يوم عاشوراء . قال النبي ﷺ: "صيام يوم عاشوراء، أحتسب على الله أن يكفر السّنة التي قبله" رواه مسلم . قال الإمام #النووي ـ رحمه الله ـ : قالوا المراد بالذنوب: الصغائر، وإن لم تكن الصغائر يُرجى تخفيف الكبائر، فإن لم تكن رُفِعت الدّرجات. [شرح مسلم] . . وهذا من فضل الله تعالى على عباده أن يصوم العبد يومًا واحدًا تكفر عنه ذنوب سَنة ماضية ، فالحمد لله على فضله وإحسانه ونشكره سبحانه وتعالى على توفيقه وامتنانه، كما نسأ…
❤3
الأربعاء: 6/24 تاسوعاء "التاسع من مُحرم" الخميس: 6/25 عاشوراء "العاشر من مُحرم" إن لم تقدروا على صيامهم فذكّروا لعل أحدهم يصوم وتأخذ أنت الأجر. يقول النبي ﷺ: «صِيَامُ يَوْمِ عَاشُورَاءَ أَحْتَسِبُ عَلَى اللهِ أَنْ يُكَفِّرَ السَّنَةَ الَّتِي قَبْلَهُ».
❤1
إن عدوّكم لا يفهم إلّا لغة واحدة، هي لغة الحِراب، هي لغة الجِهاد، هي لغة السلاح الشهيد الدكتور عبدالعزيز الرنتيسي
❤5
كيف يمكن فهمك للقرآن أن يغيّر حياتك بالكامل؟ | د. نايف بن نهار | بودكاست بدون ورق رمضان شهر القرآن كما يعرف جميعنا، نعود فيه إلى مصاحفنا لننهي ختمة أو أكثر. لكن، ما تصوراتنا الحقيقية عن القرآن؟ هل هو كتاب مقدّس أو كتاب حياة وممارسة؟ كيف تؤثر تصوراتنا عن القرآن على علاقتنا به؟ هل للقرآن دورٌ في صنا... https://youtu.be/Pfj4niPP0DY
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @SafarHawali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 381,125 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@SafarHawali named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الشيخ سفر الحوالي” (@SafarHawali), 1,364 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SafarHawali.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.