💢جریمه میلیاردی در انتظار متخلفان استخراج رمز ارز غیرمجاز‼️‼️ ⭕️ استفاده غیرمجاز از برق برای استخراج بیت کوین، منجر به دادگاهی شدن، جریمه سنگین و جمع آوری و قطع انشعاب برق فرد متخلف خواهد شد. 🤝روابط عمومی شرکت توزیع نیروی برق استان اردبیل @apedir

Channel
سعید جلیلی؛ اردبیل
@Saeedjalily_ard
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
959subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002218663739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Saeedjalily_ard |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 4 July 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Saeedjalily_ard |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 959 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 960 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 961 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 964 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 966 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 966 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 4 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 39s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🖕 | 20 | 74.1% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2024 to 20 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✅ گاز مناسب ترین سوخت برای تولید برق است ❌ استفاده از مازوت و گازوئیل برای نیروگاهها پرهزینه است 🙏با مصرف صحیح برق و گاز هوای محیط زیست را داشته باشیم . @apedir
⭕ کاهش 50 میلیون متر مکعب مصرف گاز و تامین سوخت مورد نیاز نیروگاه ها 🔵با پیوستن به پویش دو درجه کمتر یا 10 درصد صرفه جویی در مصرف گاز ⚡️روابط عمومی شرکت توزیع نیروی برق استان اردبیل @apedir
⭕️بوی 84 می آید ... #انتخابات #جلیلی #سعید_جلیلی #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ard 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ar
🖕3🤡1
⭕️ مردم عزیز ایران، انتخاب با شماست #جلیلی #سعید_جلیلی #انتخابات #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ard 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ar
🖕3❤1👍1👎1
⭕️ دکتر جلیلی با همراهی هواداران خود وارد مسجد جامع قرچک شد #جلیلی #سعید_جلیلی #انتخابات #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ard 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ar
🖕2👍1
🔺جلیلی رتبه نخست در نظرسنجیهای معتبر 🔹توییت حجتالاسلام والمسلمین پژمانفر از اعضای ستاد دکتر جلیلی و نماینده مردم مشهد در مجلس: 🔹باید از همه مردم برای یک هفته پرشور انتخاباتی تشکر کنم. براساس نظرسنجیهای معتبر، اقبال مردم به دکتر #جلیلی در حال افزایش و در رتبه نخست قرارگرفته است. برای سربلندی ایران با رای متحدمان تلاش کنیم که دکتر جلیلی با اختلاف بالا، چهاردمین رئیسجمهور ایران شود. #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_a…
🖕2🍌1👍1
⭕️#نشر_حداکثری | پویش ختم ۱۴ میلیون صلوات به نیت شهید رئیسی و انتخابات فرد اصلح 🔹در آستانه چهاردهمین دوره انتخابات ریاست جمهوری و همزمان با چهلمین روز شهادت شهدای خدمت ، پویش ختم ۱۴ میلیون صلوات به نیت شهید رئیسی و همچنین انتخاب کاندیدای اصلح آغاز به کار کرد. 🔹مخاطبان محترم در صورت تمایل با مراجعه به سایت زیر و درج تعداد صلوات مدنظر به این پویش بپیوندند. https://khatm.jalilimedia.com/ #سعید_جلیلی #انتخابات #جهش_ا…
🖕2
⭕️چرا جلیلی هراسی کردند؟! 🔹در واقع از یک ماه پیش توسط لیبرالهای وابسته داخلی کلید خورد و در اوج خودش قرار گرفت. 🔹اما دلیلی بسیار روشن دارد؛ میدانند در برخورد با فساد و رانتخواری، جدیت آقای جلیلی بینظیر است. درواقع مافیای فساد نگرانی جدی برای خودشان دارند. 🔸هنوز وقت هست؛ این کلیپ را برای دوستان و کسانی که میدانید مردد هستند ارسال کنید. #سعید_جلیلی #انتخابات #رای_من_جلیلی #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ard 🆔 @Sae…
🖕2
💢 #فوری | شوک ناگهانی به ثبتنام کنندگان طرح مسکن ملی ▫️رییس ستاد پزشکیان: هیچ تعهدی در قبال تکمیل طرح مسکن ملی نداریم. ▫️علی عبدالعلی زاده، رییس ستاد پزشکیان: اگر طرح مسکن مهر را یک طرح بد بدانیم، طرح مسکن ملی افتضاح است. کار اشتباه را ادامه نخواهیم داد و هیچ تعهدی به تکمیل این طرح نخواهیم داشت. ▫️در سه سال گذشته، دو میلیون نفر از خانوارهای فاقد مسکن در طرح مسکن ملی ثبت نام کردهاند و در حال پرداخت اقساط خود در …
🖕2
💢 #انتخابات_۱۴۰۳ | توصیههای انتخاباتی امام راحل (ره) #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ard 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ar
🖕1
♨️ آلترناتیو، تازه مثل اینکه یاد گرفتن! 😂 🔗 @Aslah_hamyan #نفی_شاخص_ها_از_غیراصلح #ویدئو #جلیلی #اثبات_شاخص_ها_در_اصلح #جهش_ایران 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ard 🆔 @Saeedjalily_ar
🖕2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Saeedjalily_ard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Saeedjalily_ard named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سعید جلیلی؛ اردبیل” (@Saeedjalily_ard), 959 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Saeedjalily_ard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.