Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for С попом обо всем!

Channel

С попом обо всем!

@S_Popom_Obo_Vsem

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,848subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001602573374
TypeChannel
Username@S_Popom_Obo_Vsem
Created15 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/S_Popom_Obo_Vsem

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,8488,8918,869.57 August 2026 — 8,891 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,889 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,879 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,882 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,872 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,871 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,865 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,876 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,878 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,877 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,860 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,849 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,848 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,842–8,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 10:418,848-1
11 Sept 2026, 15:588,849-11
6 Sept 2026, 20:208,860-17
2 Sept 2026, 05:228,877-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:288,878+2
27 Aug 2026, 10:088,876+11
24 Aug 2026, 14:168,865-6
20 Aug 2026, 18:048,871-1
17 Aug 2026, 17:358,872-10
14 Aug 2026, 11:388,882+3
10 Aug 2026, 22:148,879-10
7 Aug 2026, 19:128,889-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:188,891first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 8,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
973
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held47 (29 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,919
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36m 44s
Average length
4m 05s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,334 reactions across 47 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,04947.3%
👍70916.4%
🙏61514.2%
🔥3768.68%
🕊1232.84%
❤‍🔥932.15%
🥰922.12%
😢701.62%
👏441.02%
280.646%
🫡240.554%
🤣210.485%
😍180.415%
💯160.369%
🌚120.277%
🤗100.231%
🎉90.208%
💔50.115%
😱50.115%
🤝50.115%
4 further kinds100.231%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC479 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

60👍10🕊3🥰3

24 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,320 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Эфир в 21:00 пройдет на моих площадках в вк и ютуб: https://youtube.com/live/kfXfAIlrfk4

47👍14🕊54

24 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈1,120 views69 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🙏4710🕊4❤‍🔥3👍3🥰2

24 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈1,350 views141 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляем нашего модератора и ассистента на канале с днем рождения. Также передаём благословение от митрополита Варсонофия! Аксиос!

91👍27🔥7🤝5🎉3🙏3🕊21

23 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,180 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Третье интервью с Др. Джеем об историчности Мухаммада: "Мекка". В интервью говорили еще много о чем. Позже тоже опубликую. https://youtu.be/oTrjvZrsuLY

41👍19🔥91

23 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,140 views85 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья! Сбор закрыт. Спаси Христос всех! Всем низкий поклон за участие. И хотя порой 1 рубль пред Богом оказывается больше миллиона, как две лепты вдовицы, отмечу и поблагодарю некоторых... Вадим 120, Андрей 120, Банк Москва - 50))), Сергей -40, Елизавета - 40, ТБанк - 20, Кирилл - 15, Сергей - 15, Александр, Анастасия, Серафим, Леонид, ВТБ, ТБанк - по 10. За всех помолюсь. И Наталья, надеюсь, помолится.

47🙏362

23 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC≈1,180 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ждем миллион и закрываем сбор Наталье.

🙏3613😱2

22 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,400 views100 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Крик о помощи в болезни. Набрали почти 700 тыс. Почему-то на этой сумме сборы стали заканчиваться. На лечение нужно 1.5 млн руб. ✅ Пометка: "Пожертвования Наталье" https://youtube.com/shorts/gDBnWiRj-M4

🙏6530💔5

21 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,540 views103 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, есть ли у нас в чате тг мусульмане. Но на всякий случай... В понедельник в прямом эфире отвечу на вопросы мусульман о Православии. Вопросы можно писать под этим постом. Эфир 24 августа в 21:00. Настоятельно прошу вопросы подготовить здесь, поскольку в чате будет много народу и споров.

👍51🙏3510👏52

20 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,660 views84 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🙏718🕊5

19 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,820 views104 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Дорогие друзья! С Праздником Преображения Господня! Предлагаю к просмотру сегодняшнее видео. Оказывается, Преображение Господне сродни научной фантастике, реализованной 2000 лет назад! https://youtu.be/NJwwxk3fQsY

77👍20❤‍🔥32🕊1😱1

17 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,130 views87 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Эти Пророчества Сбываются на Глазах! - ролик с тремя пророчествами трех русских старцев святой жизни, наших современников, о современных событиях, сказанные задолго до этого: старец Кирилл Павлов, Иоанн Крестьянкин и Зосима Сокур. С вами православный священник РПЦ – протоиерей Кирилл Иванов на канале «С попом обо всем». ВК: https://vk.com/id372435888 Подписываемся на мой телеграм канал: https://t.me/S_Popom_Obo_Vsem

🙏4732🕊7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @S_Popom_Obo_Vsem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@S_Popom_Obo_Vsem edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

Нравятся ли вам интервью с иностранными учеными на нашем канале? Почему мало просмотров? Мне кажется, что интервью с Джеем Смитом по историчности Мухаммада очень интересны. Интервью с Проф. Фанти вообще уникальны даже для итальянского сегмента.

  1. Неинтересно.8%
  2. Слишком длинно.15%
  3. Слишком научно. Люблю более душевное.22%
  4. Это все еретики. Их не слушаем.9%
  5. А работать не пробовал?5%
  6. Свой ответ в комментариях.47%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“С попом обо всем!” (@S_Popom_Obo_Vsem), 8,848 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/S_Popom_Obo_Vsem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.