Channel
@SZSZMMK02
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
206subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003279708893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SZSZMMK02 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SZSZMMK02 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 206 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 206 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (21 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,726 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#案件发生地 #双子美少女南山海怡湾 #嫌疑人姓名 #稚恩 #日期 2026-08-05 #消费 648-200 #人照符合度 8.0 #颜值 7.7 #身材 大洋马 #性格 慢热 #上路 8.0 #中路 8.0 #综合评价 8.0 #详细体验 抽到200券，二话不说就来了南山这家TT，下午过来店里不太忙，看了一圈选中了稚恩，大洋马身材，这屁股和以前在国外的时候，遇到的一样，喜欢臀的兄弟们有福了，皮肤光滑，很配合，就是性格比较慢热得你带动去聊，其他都完美，会返。 #名侦探🕵️ Choose one
验证留名：青云 验证时间：8.3 老师花名：#稚蒽 城市坐标：#深圳 #南山 上课花费：1199用券 颜值身材：9分/10 服务内容：MMK 出击体验：首先感谢小松店长送的券，直接约了第二天下午稚蒽，一开始看到稚蒽妥妥的御姐风格，以为会很高冷，实际上还是蛮能聊的，不会冷场。聊了一会后开始做内容，课表上的内容都有，嘴唇软软的，🐍也很配合，女友即视感，yyc时稚蒽很主动，表情和反馈就很欲，很不错！还有其他的内容就等各位兄弟自己体验啦，总之非常推荐！ 优点缺点：颜值身材顶级，御姐范，套餐内项目都会做 反哺会比较少，如果再主动点就更好了，但是小女友的感觉也挺好！ 推荐程度：9/满分10分
繁花报告 #双子座美少女mmk @szmmk01 南山 优点： 可爱，身材好，态度好 不足： 無 补充： 技师/妹子名：#小爱 上路：小蟒蛇🐍， 中路：B 下路：亲密接触，可脱 出击双子mmk新英雄小爱、摩卡看着很精神，看了别人的报告感觉可以试一下、位置比较好找，在一楼直接就到了、不足的地方，房间大沙发小，倒反天罡、妹妹进来一看、不错、干干净净的感觉、优点、五官端正，身材苗条有型、中路有B、不错不错、上路小蟒蛇可以持久，态度可以，服务都有不过要提，作为新人，刚接触不久来说值得去打卡，后续再返。 综合评分： 5 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。
航线： #双子美少女，航海员：#小爱 霸王神鸡 出海联系 @szmmk01 出航经费 1199-半价 出海日期 2026/07/28 适合人群 所有人 返航次数 第一次 航海员特点： #可爱#身材好 优点：很配合 缺点：暂无 评分 颜值：7 态度：9 上路：8.5 中路：8.5 综合评分：8.8 航海经历： 出击新英雄小爱、摩卡看着很精神，看了别人的报告感觉可以试一下、位置比较好找，在一楼直接就到了、不足的地方，房间大沙发小，倒反天罡、妹妹进来一看、不错、干干净净的感觉、优点、五官端正，身材苗条有型、中路有B、不错不错、上路小蟒蛇可以持久，态度可以，服务都有 不过要提，作为新人，刚接触不久来说值得去打卡，后续再返。
饱饱好评，C级大熊
历史第一敏感体质豆包的好评来了
#案件发生地 #双子南山店 #嫌疑人姓名 #梦冉 #日期 2026-06-05 #消费 1199/2（工兵优惠） #人照符合度 9 #颜值 8 #身材 165B，苗条 #性格 很会撩拨 #上路 9 #中路 10 #综合评价 9 #详细体验 梦冉是一个让我有点纠结的女孩，因为我其实上过两个钟，第一个钟跟第二个钟体验差距巨大。首先梦冉尺度偏小，1199只能做到隔裤摸下，这一点得提醒一下群友，点她建议先上低阶看看氛围。其次第一个钟氛围特别尬，让我有一种柔式采耳的感觉，她会撩拨，但是节奏特别慢，慢到让人有点失去耐心。但是阴差阳错的第二个钟，我感觉她换了一个人一样，可能是第一次聊的比较多，熟悉了，也可能是她自己打开心结了? 优点:颜值上，我觉得五官很漂亮，身材凹凸有致又紧致，视觉效果很好，声音脆脆的好听，中下的反馈很强。很会很会聊天，情绪价值给的非常到位，熟悉了之后真的有种粘人小女友的感觉，一个这么漂亮的妹子粘人，说真的非常之顶不住。…
#案件发生地 #双子南山店 #嫌疑人姓名 #丫头 #日期 2026-06-05 #消费 1199/2（工兵优惠） #人照符合度 7.0 #颜值 7.0 #身材 凹凸有致 肚子有一点肉 #性格 腼腆内向 破冰后会讲骚话 #上路 6.8 #中路 7.4 #综合评价 7.3 #详细体验 休息了一两个月，好久没上钟的妹妹，素人感比较强，像邻家女孩一样，笑起来腼腆而含蓄，稍微熟悉下，会讲点“好奇怪，今天对你怎么这么敏感。”（就当你夸我了😭，赌上我单身30年的手速。）做课表时候更是重量级，生怕别人听到，一直压着声音哼哼唧唧的。偷感很强了。 上路，浅中🐍这样，时长尚可，调教后能改善，从舌尖的浅尝辄止，到慢慢投入。中路，b+左右，手感不错，挑逗补钙🥛是🈶反馈，敏感点之一。聊天只能说有待加强，偶尔会尬住。可以理解。适合喜欢素人感妹子的老哥，还没有变油，没有那么多坏习惯。 #名侦探🕵️ BOB (25≈52)
❤1
Telegram 中文圈搜索引擎，积木JIMU 帮你查询任何您想要的群组、频道（不论公开与私密） 👉 助力可提升搜索排名与曝光 🚀
【服务评分，满分10】：10 【妹子花名】：#梦冉 【验证留名】：风清扬 【验证时间】：6/2日 【ci地点】：到店 【人照相似真人打几分】：人照一致，很漂亮 【身高身材】：身高一米六多，腿细修长，皮肤滑嫩 【凶器罩杯】：B罩杯 【个人标签】：#清纯甜妹 【环境细节】：卫生很好 【服务过程】：看一群ly写的报告，忍不住想要来体验一下店里的头牌，恰好放假，坐高铁直接就跑来了，妹妹今天上身穿了一个黑色吊带，下身牛仔短裤，一进来第一眼感觉身材很哇塞，皮肤白嫩，大腿修长，整个身材比例很好，妹妹很热情，非常的健谈不会冷场，服务都很主动，情绪价值拉满，整个过程中吻的很投入，体验感非常好，是个大蟒蛇，奶头给我舔的很舒服😂，问了妹妹后面没预约了就果断加了钟，强烈推荐各位 ly 来体验！！！不虚此行，有时间再来二刷！。
新人妞妞，客人真实反馈！
航线： #双子座 航海员：#小晴 船员 万花丛中过 出海联系 @szmmk01 出航经费 1199套餐 出海日期 2026/05/19 适合人群 基本都适合，更适合胸控，颜控 航海员特点： #高颜值 #有气质 #瘦底大波 #敏感 优点：瘦底大波，高颜值，敏感 缺点：少许腿毛 评分 颜值：9 态度：8.5 上路：（个人没试） 中路：10（真正D罩杯脂肪胸，且敏感） 综合评分：9 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10 幻神） 航海历程 双子座发了模卡小晴，一眼我就喜欢，看了165D的参数，更爱了。于是果断预约，然后来到店里，见到真人，基本和照片差不多漂亮，清纯有气质。然后卸甲，哇塞，一对大白兔呼之欲出，真是漂亮，正宗D罩杯！白白嫩嫩的脂肪胸，手感超级好，亲上去也敏感，真是非常难得。然后看到妹妹的腰，居然没有啥赘肉，腰很细，正宗的瘦底大波！屁股和腿也有肉，瑕不掩瑜。整个身材和长相可以说非常顶。服务也蛮好，课表都满足。 非常愉快的…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @SZSZMMK02. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 703,972 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳双子美少女MMK体验报告” (@SZSZMMK02), 206 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SZSZMMK02.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.