Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ST Elegram

Channel

ST Elegram

@ST_T_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

104subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541217410
TypeChannel
Username@ST_T_channel
Created3 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ST_T_channel

Growth

104105104.57 August 2026 — 105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105 subscribers23 August 2026 — 104 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 23:59104-1
9 Aug 2026, 09:02105no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:00105first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
120.0%
👌120.0%
👍120.0%
😁120.0%
😱120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 4 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Dec 2025, 15:34 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://x.com/dutch1777real/status/1996437663805829460?s=46 Esoteric Christopher leeism

😱1

19 Nov 2025, 09:44 UTC123 viewsread 9 August 2026

Hell this is what Minsky and Weiner were talking about so long ago

19 Nov 2025, 09:44 UTC112 viewsread 9 August 2026

They've been saying that since the 80s, you cant get human-like AI without it having a physical form in the world. Something like Boston Dynamics would be closer

19 Nov 2025, 09:44 UTC99 viewsread 9 August 2026

Well, well, well… https://fixupx.com/mauiboymacro/status/1989848765226975358

19 Nov 2025, 09:42 UTC63 viewsread 9 August 2026

Sure, I’m all for making the most of America’a natgas as well, which is far too often flared off due to lack of infrastructure to transport it. Infrastructure that Trump could order as a critical military necessity and put Heritage Americans into good paying jobs to create immediately. Including home ownership credits and incentives, just like veterans received when they returned from WW2. Making energy as cheap a

19 Nov 2025, 09:37 UTC50 viewsread 9 August 2026

It’s Spenglerian. They view it as obvious bc it’s not rational. Difficult to quantify civilizational exhaustion.

19 Nov 2025, 09:37 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026

I missed the beginning so maybe it was covered earlier in the stream, but can anyone explain why Auron and Bogbeef kinda replied to my superchat with an attitude of, “Oh, well in late-stage empire of course they don’t bother innovating.” Ok, but why? What’s the causal reason why people with the money and authority to choose R&D and innovation prefer instead to choose “managed decline”? Is there something “obvious”

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ST_T_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ST Elegram” (@ST_T_channel), 104 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ST_T_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.