Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

заморозка. 𝐒𝐓𝐄𝓥𝐄 (( 𝖧𝐆 ))

@STEVIEHG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003447523111
TypeChannel
Username@STEVIEHG
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 3 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/STEVIEHG

Growth

444544.511 Aug 2026, 11:18 — 45 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:31 — 45 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 05:27 — 44 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:1812 Aug 2026, 05:27
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:2744-1
11 Aug 2026, 11:3145no change
11 Aug 2026, 11:1845first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

304 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54471730271271411076922.7%
custom 53394378656108065964013.2%
custom 53572379237773775743310.9%
custom 5445315926218000095278.88%
custom 5357209783151650214227.24%
custom 5366466623085509273196.25%
custom 5442656327849497319196.25%
custom 5339459937447741644185.92%
custom 5390878096209502782165.26%
custom 5292028925675865654123.95%
custom 537556809687239321161.97%
custom 537526370824515760151.64%
custom 537558213712048455951.64%
custom 529400280674574552441.32%
custom 532334556375052711630.987%
custom 537525027788242229930.987%
custom 544501727996203972130.987%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @STEVIEHG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 February 2026 to 4 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Mar 2026, 06:51 UTC94 viewsread 11 August 2026

все таки выгорел, желания вести данный дневник нету, фандом мертвеет, как я понял, и не такой как раньше. И я вернулся к своей целевой - фандом гп. Спасибо, за все эмоции, при длительности ведения этого дневника. Они просто незабываемые. Коннекты со всеми разрываю. Если хотите следить за моим творчеством, то нахожусь там: https://t.me/GRMONTAg

4 Mar 2026, 06:44 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «заморозка. 𝐒𝐓𝐄𝓥𝐄 (( 𝖧𝐆 ))»

12 Feb 2026, 14:19 UTC286 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🅰️🤩🤩🤩🤩🅰️

custom 54471730271271411074

12 Feb 2026, 11:11 UTC280 views28 reactions5 Starsread 11 August 2026
File

🫥 #ℳ𝗎𝗌ì𝖼𝖺𝗅 🔣 🔤🔤🔤🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎀 ➖🔠перестал смотреть в зеркала не из скромности. 🤩росто однажды я увидел там не себя, 🤩 того, кто смотрит на нас из-за завесы. 🤩 он мне подмигнул.➖ 🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️ 🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️

custom 53572097831516502149custom 54471730271271411078custom 53394378656108065967custom 53572379237773775741custom 53752502778824222991custom 53755680968723932111custom 53755821371204845591

12 Feb 2026, 11:10 UTC218 views40 reactions23 Starsread 11 August 2026

🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩ерез десять минут в доме Харрингтонов снова воцарилась тишина. Стив стоял посреди гостиной, глядя на то, что осталось от его старых «друзей». Кровь на ковре казалась черной в тусклом свете. Голос Генри в его голове удовлетворенно рассмеялся. ➖ 🤩олодец, Стив. Теперь ты чувствуешь? Тишину. Покой. Ты — мой самый лучший инструмент. Стиву нужно отделаться от улик. От трупов. От крови на ковре. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩

custom 544717302712714110712custom 535723792377737757410custom 53394378656108065969custom 53752502778824222992custom 53752637082451576012custom 53755680968723932112custom 53755821371204845592custom 53572097831516502141

12 Feb 2026, 11:03 UTC137 views40 reactions17 Starsread 11 August 2026

🌟🌟.🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ #𝓟𝗅ø𝗍 🌟🌟 🌟🤩апоминаю про 🌟🌟 дисклеймер, перед прочтением данного поста. 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 💀 🤩ом Харрингтона всегда был пуст, но теперь он был наполнен звуками. Тиканье невидимых напольных часов отдавалось в черепе Стива тяжелыми ударами молота. В каждом углу, в каждой тени ему мерещились длинные, склизкие щупальца, тянущиеся к нему. – 🤩ни бесполезны, Стив... — голос Генри звучал прямо за его плечом, холодн

custom 533945993744774164410custom 53908780962095027828custom 53572097831516502146custom 54471730271271411076custom 53752637082451576013custom 53755680968723932113custom 53572379237773775742custom 53755821371204845592

7 Feb 2026, 23:27 UTC230 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

custom 54471730271271411072

7 Feb 2026, 23:20 UTC238 views38 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

🫥 #ℳ𝗎𝗌ì𝖼𝖺𝗅 🔣 🔤 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🎀 ➖🔠аньше я боялся, 🅰️то ты скажешь мне "⬜️⬜️⬜️". 🤩еперь я боюсь, что ты скажешь мне "⬛️⬛️⬛️⬛️", 🤩огда я превращаюсь в ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖.➖ 🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️ 🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️🕸️

custom 535723792377737757410custom 53394378656108065967custom 54453159262180000957custom 54471730271271411074custom 53394599374477416443custom 53908780962095027823custom 53572097831516502142custom 54426563278494973192

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @STEVIEHG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 387,124 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“заморозка. 𝐒𝐓𝐄𝓥𝐄 (( 𝖧𝐆 ))” (@STEVIEHG), 44 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/STEVIEHG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.